Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long can we drag out our tenancy?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for some frank advice.

 

Moved into a privately rented property in March 2014, on a 12 month contract without a break clause.

 

Owner has sold the property on. We've had little communication as to what's going on, but we gather that the new owner plans to move in 'when we move out' in March.

 

March next year does seem like quite some time away, but the issue is availability of suitable property - it took us about 9 months for a property to become available for us to move into, as there's a huge lack. It's a small town of 6,500 and, as an example - there hasn't been a single 3+ bed home to rent for several weeks. Moving out the town is barely an option, given our daughter starts school in the town in September (and my wife doesn't drive).

 

We've already started looking for a new property, in the hope the new owner will agree to surrender the lease early. If, however, we're unable to find somewhere before March, or the new owner refuses to surrender the lease, how long can you practically stretch out a tenancy agreement before you start incurring costs (inc losing deposit) / risk very short eviction periods?

 

We have always, and will always continue, to pay rent & look after the property without question - but I physically can't move my family out until such time as there's another property in the area to move into - but also don't want to face the possibility of having 14 days notice to leave without anywhere to go either.

 

I appreciate I'm not in the worse situation in the world - but it's frustrating, especially given we're only a couple of months into the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably you are renting through an agency?

 

For starters can you check that your deposit is still protected correctly?

 

Assuming the above is all OK, then when your tenancy fixed period runs out it does not take that long for a landlord to evict a tenant (assuming they follow the process correctly). I reckoned 6-8 weeks when researching this in relation to a problem tenant of a friend recently, unless you can convince a judge you would suffer severe hardship at which point you might get another 6 weeks.

 

I don't know enough to know whether your situation would count as severe hardship. But the few weeks you might gain is probably not going to help you much by the sounds of it.

 

Sounds like opening discussions with the new owner is the way to go, and it will depend on their situation. They may be in rented accommodation, with a deadline to move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to be officially advised as to the change of ownership and that the contract will be honoured.

proof that any deposit is still protected and LL details has been changed, or the deposit returned to you.

New LL has to send you an S21 notice for repossession giving at least two clear months notice to the end of the contract.

Note: if deposit NOT protected or information not provided S21 notice is not valid.

Usually takes 6-8 weeks to get eviction notice and Judge may grant further period in extreme cases, before bailiffs turn up!

Obviously discuss with new owner if find somewhere sooner, to get deposit released/notice etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys.

Legal ownership is yet to be completed, but will be sure to check we're formally notified.

That said, we're now being that the sale won't complete until next March (when our tenancy ends) to save the new owners from having to take on the tenancy. Not sure I buy that story, given we were initially told the owner was after a quick sale to fund a purchase of his own, and that the surveyor has recently been round - surely a mortgage offer wouldn't be kept open for 8 months? I'll keep an eye on things - including the land registry in case they try and pull a fast one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

New owners will often want vacant possession.

 

When I was involved in the sale of a house which had a "tenant" (actually a friend who was house-sitting following the owner relocating) the tenant was asked to sign the contract to say he would leave on the completion date.

 

So if any paperwork comes to you for signing, read it carefully!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads up Steve_M - I will, without a doubt, not be signing anything which may be a way of them trying to circumvent my right to remain!

 

I don't intend to drag the tenancy out unnecessarily (if I didn't have the kids, I'd be more open to making it harder for them!), but certainly won't make it easy for them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple answer is you can stay until evicted by Bailiffs, but note LL can ask for Court Order against you for hearing costs (~£280-£400).

8 months should be ample to find suitable alternative accom in area, even if not your 'perfect' home.

If buyers want vacant possession on completion, current LL may offer a financial inducement for quick departure, though Courts will only allow max 42 days to vacate, more likely 14-28 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 months should be enough, but the reality is I don't have 8 months - property goes quick, so I only really have a window of a few weeks (ie, if I see somewhere in Jan which is ready to move in beginning on Feb, my changes of them keeping it until mid-March is slim to none).

 

(In the 3-4 weeks I've been keeping an eye on things, not a single 3 or 4 bed house has been listed)

 

Unless of course they do allow us to exit early, which I imagine is the best we can hope for really.

 

Oh the joys on renting :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...