Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Another Caught With Freedom Pass Case, But An interesting one! Sorry


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

New member here and am happy I have found this site, some very interesting articles and topics with great advice.

 

I have worked in London for many years now and have always purchased a travel card.

 

Last week, I found a freedom pass on the floor of my local station. Over the course of 4 days admittedly used it a small number of times as I was intrigued about what it was and hadn't actually heard of one before, but my intention was not to keep it.

 

At the same time, I also buy a weekly travel card each week. When I used the pass, I had a weekly travel card valid for zones 1-6, so even though I used it, I wasn't trying to evade my fare. I am not going to dribble off a load of poor excuses like I have seen in other threads as its just embarrassing.

 

I left my travel card at home on Monday (the last weeks travel card still being active as it expired at the end of the day on Monday) and used the Freedom Pass. While doing so, an inspector caught me at the gates. I do not need to be lectured on what a freedom pass is or the moral ethics of using one, but I genuinely was not using it to evade the fare as in my eyes I had already paid for a ticket even though I didnt have one on me.

 

Bottom line is the guy questioned me and I admitted that it wasnt mine and he wrote a few things down and said TFL will be in touch. So the prosecutors there have got a straight confession. I thought it better to be honest than lie and be awkward.

 

I want to ask advice on how I should present my plea and some ideas of what it could include?

 

I have managed to coup together three months worth of my travel cards and have the receipts and also every transaction made to South West trains for my travels by the way of bank statements. I have many many receipts dating back months that I could present. I am hoping this will show that I am honest and never try evade my fares.

 

I also have a valid ticket that was bought last week that was valid on the day I was caught using the freedom pass. These are the only two things that I have a leg to stand on as I am aware that TFL are very strict when it comes to Freedom passes, but this is the best shot in my opinion of getting an out of court settlement.

 

Any advice would be massively appreciated as I am very nervous and worried about the outcome of this situation.

 

Thanks

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that you had a valid ticket is irrelevant to this case. They will have evidence of use based on when and where it was used after ascertaining the time of loss from the holder.

 

 

I am surprised that the police were not called due to this being a clear case of theft/fraud, though this may still happen.

 

 

I would suggest that you engage legal representation as this will likely end up in court and your only hope is a reduction in sentence by an early guilty plea and mitigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was the police that stopped me. He had a badge but it all happened quite quickly.

 

I dont see it requiring legal representation as there is nothing in my opinion a solicitor will say that is going to help the case. I will just have to admit, put my hands up and accept the fine and conviction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All TfL RPI and RCIs carry their ID in a crested wallet somewhat similar to a police warrant card.

 

 

Well because it's bread and butter for a solicitor - they do have their ways...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

New member here and am happy I have found this site, some very interesting articles and topics with great advice.

 

I have worked in London for many years now and have always purchased a travel card.

 

Last week, I found a freedom pass on the floor of my local station. Over the course of 4 days admittedly used it a small number of times as I was intrigued about what it was and hadn't actually heard of one before, but my intention was not to keep it.

 

At the same time, I also buy a weekly travel card each week. When I used the pass, I had a weekly travel card valid for zones 1-6, so even though I used it, I wasn't trying to evade my fare. I am not going to dribble off a load of poor excuses like I have seen in other threads as its just embarrassing.

 

I left my travel card at home on Monday (the last weeks travel card still being active as it expired at the end of the day on Monday) and used the Freedom Pass. While doing so, an inspector caught me at the gates. I do not need to be lectured on what a freedom pass is or the moral ethics of using one, but I genuinely was not using it to evade the fare as in my eyes I had already paid for a ticket even though I didnt have one on me.

 

Bottom line is the guy questioned me and I admitted that it wasnt mine and he wrote a few things down and said TFL will be in touch. So the prosecutors there have got a straight confession. I thought it better to be honest than lie and be awkward.

 

I want to ask advice on how I should present my plea and some ideas of what it could include?

 

I have managed to coup together three months worth of my travel cards and have the receipts and also every transaction made to South West trains for my travels by the way of bank statements. I have many many receipts dating back months that I could present. I am hoping this will show that I am honest and never try evade my fares.

 

I also have a valid ticket that was bought last week that was valid on the day I was caught using the freedom pass. These are the only two things that I have a leg to stand on as I am aware that TFL are very strict when it comes to Freedom passes, but this is the best shot in my opinion of getting an out of court settlement.

 

Any advice would be massively appreciated as I am very nervous and worried about the outcome of this situation.

 

Thanks

 

"Last week, I found a freedom pass on the floor of my local station. Over the course of 4 days admittedly used it a small number of times as I was intrigued about what it was and hadn't actually heard of one before, but my intention was not to keep it.

 

At the same time, I also buy a weekly travel card each week. When I used the pass, I had a weekly travel card valid for zones 1-6, so even though I used it, I wasn't trying to evade my fare."

 

TFL will no doubt be able to ask a court to consider if it is rational / believable that you would buy a travelcard, not use it in any way, and use someone else's freedom pass that you weren't entitled to, had decided to keep hold of but you didn't intend to keep it.

 

Firstly, you are likely liable for theft of the freedom pass. You say you didn't intend to keep it (which, conveniently, might appear to make you no longer liable for its theft, as you can claim you had "no intent to permanently deprive") ... but you have retained some of its utility / 'goodness", as if returned to its owner : they have lost a period of its validity.

 

Next, you will claim you had previously paid your fare, by means of the travelcard. TFL can suggest to a court that the travelcard may have been in use by someone else at the same time, hence you had not paid your fare ; and that to use someone else's Freedom Pass while having your own travelcard sat at home unused is just fanciful, and that the "own travelcard valid, so I'd paid my fare" is merely a ruse.

 

"I also have a valid ticket that was bought last week that was valid on the day I was caught using the freedom pass": was this bought before or after you were caught?

If bought after you were caught : it would be irrelevant to prosecution, as the requirement is to show a valid ticket on demand, or (for S5(3) RRA 1889) that you had previously paid your fare. Buying a ticket after being caught, thinking "that'll get me off the hook" doesn't wash.

 

If bought before you were caught :this still makes no sense, care to explain?.

If you weren't trying to evade your fare - why not show that ticket at the time to the staff who caught you?, and just how many tickets do you want to have for your journey (that ticket, the travelcard, the freedom pass ; it just seems ludicrous and unbelievable).

 

I'd need a deal more explanation before your actions sound anything other than theft and fare evasion.

I'm not a prosecutor, (and I also don't work on the railways). If you went to court pleading "not guilty" I'd expect a skilled prosecutor to be able to pick holes in your story unless there is a deal more to it that you have revealed so far.

 

TFL will write to you. If your reply isn't entirely truthful it will harden their resolve to prosecute.

I find your story so far implausible (for the reasons I have stated) : you may have to do a better job of explaining to TFL (or CAG'ers) why it is truthful, accurate and plausible.

 

TFL generally take a hard line on Freedom Pass abuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You used the pass for 4 days - depriving its rightful owner and at the same time signifying that you intended to keep it. You write that you are honest and you never try to evade paying for travel tickets, yet if you were honest you would have returned the pass and not used it once, let alone 4 times.

 

I don't wish to sound harsh but I don't hold out much hope for you in the situation you have described. I am not sure if you will receive any helpful advice in this matter because there is also the additional element of theft in that you didn't return the card.

 

You say you had a valid travel card yet you used another card. I can not see any reason why you would do this, it is nonsensical. Perhaps plead a case of diminished responsibility.

 

Perhaps plead a case of diminished responsibility.

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyones comments and suggestions, some very strong points that I hadnt thought about.

 

I will have to see and wait if I hear anything from them and deal with it accordingly.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, i reread my last post and it does sound harsh re diminished responsibility - though I see that as the only possible mitigating circumstances. I didn't mean for my post to sound harsh (which it appears to be) - just criticism there to possibly help with your defence.

Good luck!

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original post imo showed diminished responsibility. Diminished responsibility interpreted to include an abnormal mind. So whilst not relying on diminished responsibility as a defence, lead on from there to show abnormal mind could be a defence. Other than that I am not sure how OP can prove mitigating circumstances.

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO the original post (hopefully captured in the quote in post #7) shows irresponsibility. Not diminished responsibility.

 

I think any court will be more than capable of distinguishing between the two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO the original post (hopefully captured in the quote in post #7) shows irresponsibility. Not diminished responsibility.

 

I think any court will be more than capable of distinguishing between the two.

 

Yup, they've deleted their original post (Edited: but it is now back?).

 

That's why I tend to quote posts : so the thread still makes sense if they decide to delete (or edit to something vastly different)

 

I guess the OP didn't get the "get out of jail free" they were hoping for?.

Edited by BazzaS
Edited to reflect OP seems to have been re-instated
Link to post
Share on other sites

diminished responsibility - i chose to use this term instead of other terms (even though pleading diminished responsibility is for murder).

chose to use that term as i couldn't think of any other way to say the behaviour outlined in first post was abnormal and almost difficult to believe.

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

diminished responsibility - i chose to use this term instead of other terms (even though pleading diminished responsibility is for murder).

chose to use that term as i couldn't think of any other way to say the behaviour outlined in first post was abnormal and almost difficult to believe.

It does stretch the limits a bit. But no more than many of the posts here, where speeders caught doing 84 mph in a 70 mph zone try to justify why engine revs and hills mean that they couldn't have been doing 84 mph. Or parking tickets for failure to display when the ticket got "blown on to the floor". Etc.

 

But all I see is irresponsibility and the dribbling off of a load of poor excuses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bandit... yes... i couldn't agree more! i was trying to be nice without sounding harsh but it failed lol

If I've given you advice, then it is just my thoughts / opinions - doesn't mean I am right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

If you find a freedom pass, why not hand it in to the station staff so the person who has lost it can have it returned?

Once you know what it is, you should realise that not handing it in is pretty appalling behaviour on your part, and its loss could be extremely distressing for the person who may be reliant on it. How would you feel if it was your elderly mother now unable to even use the bus until the council eventually replaced the lost one, when it could have been posted back in a day or two?

Sympathy? Nope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Out of court settlement for me... :whoo:

 

Hello again. I'm pleased for you about the result. :)

 

Could you tell us a bit more about it please? This will help future caggers and also let the people who took time to advise you what happened.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...