Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The outlet is in Camden Town and was set up in 2006, a year after my husband established the business, in addition to selling at exhibitions, online, shows, events, and having licensing agreements in some places overseas.  The only thing I have stopped doing since I got ill is the physical stuff, which I’m working on. The business has not changed name or anything like that either. I’m not sure where the original contract with Camden is but the management must still have it. My husband died in Jan 2017, and until Sept 2018, I would take the stock in every week; after that I was sending it in by post. I went in now and then when possible to re-do the display but that was about it. No one had access to any files until 2020. Moved house in 2020 thought would have to pull it all, Covid had just hit as well. The person in question said he would be interested in taking over and paying the rent etc. so I said I would let him sell the pictures for nothing as long as he would ‘keep it warm’ for me.  Obviously, everywhere was closed for lockdown. During this time I was working out how to go forward.  In May 2022 I told him I couldn’t  give anything away for free anymore, and put in place the wholesale agreement.  I’ve disregarded any discrepancies from before this date. I sent over the jpgs electronically, so I’ve still got them too. He hasn’t got any original files like .psds negatives or memory cards etc, I’ve got proof of all ownership/copyright. A co-op is whereby a small number of neighbours work on a rotational basis so they each of them can have time off, that way everyone doesn’t need to be there at the same time, he had never been an employee of mine.  The only reason I allowed him to have the files in the first place as I didn’t want to lose that side of the business.  It’s a good, constant source of income. However, the rent was becoming crippling as I believed there was something fishy going on well before this as there’s so much cash dealt with there, and I couldn’t go in regularly in person, and I’m sure sales weren’t being recorded properly and cash was being pocketed. My husband was too busy to be doing any stock control properly, he wasn't really into paperwork, and the guy who was ‘helping’ me after my husband's death, was making things very difficult for me to implement a solid stock control system by refusing to co-operate on simple things like using email etc. which I thought was a smokescreen, so I severed ties with him just before I made the agreement in question. I sent about 100 images, jpg files, sent via We Transfer. I’ve got the confirmation of which files were sent with dates. I will have to go through closed bank accounts and previous tax returns to get a proper estimate.   Before I made this agreement, I was selling retail there, this is a wholesale agreement so I’ll have to do some calculations but it is definitely in the thousands.  I haven’t got his his home address, and I don't think he's got any sizeable assets. I’m also worried that he might send the files overseas and start selling them there. I know he’s not stupid enough to sell them online. He knows for sure how serious this is, but he’s been chancing it and thinks I’m stupid, if not soft and stupid. I don’t know if this would work but I am thinking that when he does contact me, I tell him we need to talk, tell him I know what he’s been up to, and strongly urge him not to order any more prints from wherever he is having them printed because it will make things much worse for him if he does. Then when I do tell him about the gravity of the situation, maybe a few days later, I think it will scare him into complying because the consequences definitely trump the few quid he thinks he is saving by getting his own printing done. Tell him an amount that I want back for lost revenue, and make it clear that if he doesn’t destroy the files and if I find out he is still doing it at any point down the line, I will seek prosecution for copyright infringement and fraud, which I will. I don’t know how I can enforce any of this without involving the courts though. I will be able to tell, though, and he will know this. And the only reason I am doing this now rather than before, is that I couldn’t prove anything until now.  It was screamingly obvious from the beginning though, as he wasn’t ordering enough from me to pay the rent, let alone make a profit. If I decided to come down like him lie a ton of bricks straight away, how would I go about a cease and desist, would I have to get one from the court? And what do I do about the stock he currently holds? It has also occurred to me that he might file for bankruptcy or similar if things get heavy, where would that leave me? I could put the feelers out for a brand-new person to take it on, obviously without giving them access to files, that is an option. But that comes with its own set of issues. Also, would there be any implications for me, if I kept quiet for now? Let him order again from me as if nothing has happened, as it will be any day and I want to get all my ducks in a row first ideally….   Thanks again
    • I’ve also just realised their online website they’ve got 12 photographs of my vehicle, including close ups of the inside?? Not sure why that’s relevant.  The time stamp on the first photo is 13:57, the PCN incident time is 14:12. 
    • I’m tempted to send a letter to the company outlining the reasons why I think their PCN is illegitimate. I guess will technically be an appeal.  Their documentation states they won’t discuss over phone, I also don’t want them to have my email address.    re signage on entrance, having looked at land registry, the whole road is private, and when you turn into the road off the highway, there is a sign on the lamppost about 20m in, again not noticeable and on the other side of the road.  I feel like I am in a difficult position with this, I understand that I may have a good chance of not having to pay, but at the same token the stress this is already causing me makes me feel like it’s not worth the £60!
    • Well done with the photo. Of course the signage is insufficient.  PPM are not interested in competent management of a car park, they are interested in catching drivers out so they can issue their PCNs. For a start, according to their trade associations' Codes of Practice, they are supposed to have signage at the entrance. Any e-mail reply from the company and whether they will/won't/can/can't get the invoice cancelled?    
    • I will annotate the message I sent for the forum.  Sorry, didn't see this straight away...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

wrong ticket issued ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3621 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday July the 13th parked my car in a marked space and paid my £1 for one hour.

 

The maximum stay as stated on the sign is one hour,

there is nothing saying you must leave and not return in a certain time.

 

i put another £1 in for a extra hour,

the traffic warden arrives looks at my ticket and walks on

does his round of the car park and sees that someone had overstayed by 40 mins ans issues them with a ticket.

 

The bloke who got the ticket goes mental and tells the warden that I had been more than an hour

and insisted I get a ticket also.

 

Looking on my ticket it is issued for not displaying a ticket ??

 

can i appeal on a technical fault here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to appeal this or pay

As before you know it bailiffs will become involved and massive fees

 

If you have the pay and display ticket it will gave a time on it as will the parking fine

Should be a easy appeal

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to their website it is 1 hour limited.

 

"Notes: Ferry Way 1 hour limited waiting £1.00"

http://www.poole.gov.uk/transport-and-streets/parking/car-parking-charges/beach-car-parks/ (Right at the bottom of the page)

 

(Assuming this is all that is written on the meter) ... to me, this would mean you would have to leave the car park and come back again... but it's definitely not clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for the reply guys, the car park is Ferry way Poole

there was only one ticket on display

 

Could you answer my questions, in post 6. It's important to know the exact contravention - what you stand accused of - and what was on display.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Code 06 is for on-street contraventions. You can check with the council whether that place is defined as on-street, or as a car park. If it's the latter, then the wrong contravention code has been used, but you'll have to find out to be sure.

 

And my other question? "did you have your second ticket on display in the vehicle when he started to issue it?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look - do you want to know where you stand or not? The question is not how many tickets were on display. I am asking whether the second ticket was on display, when the CEO started issuing your PCN.

 

Just tell us. If you don't I'm giving up on the thread because you can't be helped if we don't know the facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look - do you want to know where you stand or not? The question is not how many tickets were on display. I am asking whether the second ticket was on display, when the CEO started issuing your PCN.

 

Just tell us. If you don't I'm giving up on the thread because you can't be helped if we don't know the facts.

 

He made it clear that there was only one ticket on display. I'm not sure what you're having a problem with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You had paid for the all of the time you parked there. The CEO doesn't know if you were there for the previous hour, he's possibly just going on the member of the publics word.

 

He ticketed you for not displaying a ticket, but you were displaying one. Send an appeal and they should accept it. Send a copy of the ticket showing you paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He made it clear that there was only one ticket on display. I'm not sure what you're having a problem with.

 

Can't you read the post you yourself are quoting back at me?? I don't want to know how many were on display. It's irrelevant. Four times I've asked a different question and still nonethwiser. It's just a waste of time. You have to have a valid ticket on display when he starts issuing. Not any old ticket, as you seem to think. A valid, current one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please dont get grumpy

the ticket on display was the valid one

 

previous one in glove box

 

^^^^^

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looking at the car park and the wording on the road, where the ticket is a car park, contravention should have been 83 Parked without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket and not 06.

you say your ticket was clearly on display and the previous was in the glove box.

 

your appeal should be on 2 points

wrong contravention code

ticket clearly on display.

 

when you appeal send in a copy of the ticket purchased, to show a valid ticket was there when the PCN was issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your appeal should be on 2 points

wrong contravention code

ticket clearly on display.

 

 

What has the wrong code got to do with it? He is alledged to have failed to display a valid ticket that is the only contravention that needs to be addressed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

however the wrong code was used to issue the ticket, 06 instead of 83, so i would have thought that to points of appeal would be better than one

What has the wrong code got to do with it? He is alledged to have failed to display a valid ticket that is the only contravention that needs to be addressed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...