Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg / BC / Marlin / Mortimer Clarke - court threat


A.Rocketblast
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just had a letter from Mortimer Clarke saying Marlin have passed the account onto them.

 

The letter has words like "could" when referring to court proceedings, but also has:

 

As you have not agreed a reasonable payment plan "

... our client has asked us to issue Court proceedings against you.

" And "This means we will be asking the Court to make a judgment against you."

 

This does seem quite definite.

 

I haven't been in contact with Marlin - basically ignoring all their letters.

 

Should I CCA them in the first instance?

 

Thank you.

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan the letter up please:

 

**you can post up images/letters by this method immediately..you don't need 10 posts**

.

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

************************* ************************* ***********

.

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

http://www.convert-jpg-to-pdf.net/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

or

use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though DONT USE BANK NAMES or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice DD-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

...

YOU DONT have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box..just upload it ..job done

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I've seen that onebefore lots of times

 

tell us about the debt please

 

what is it?

how old?

last pay?

is it on your credit file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I've seen that onebefore lots of times

 

Is it more than a standard threat-o-gram? It seems more intentional than I've seen previously.

 

tell us about the debt please

 

what is it?

how old?

last pay?

is it on your credit file?

 

dx

 

It was for an egg credit card. Date of default was March 2009. I haven't paid anything since.

 

It is on my credit file. (I've just signed up on Noodle).

 

Thank you,

 

Mike

Edited by A.Rocketblast
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry your title does say EGG

 

send them a CCA request

 

and EGG [via their Canadian square address]

an SAR to get all the statements.

 

is this egg card with Barclaycard now or was?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

While searchng for the canada Square Address address I cam across this web page:

 

citibank. co. uk/personals/cards/cards/feedback/egg.htm

 

about PPI reclaims which suggests I need to send an SAR request to Barclaycard as my account had been moved to them.

 

Is this correct?

 

Thank you,

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

And ... is this the best address to send the SAR to for Barclaycard?

 

Data Protection Team

Dept LRC

Barclaycard

Northampton

NN4 7SG

 

There seems to be some discussion around as to which is the best address.

 

Thank you,

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

it goes to the Canadian square address

 

as in the egg forum sticky

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a reply from Mortimer Clarke ... it goes something like this:

 

We have received your letter of ....

 

We acknowledge your request for documents unser S77/78 Consume Credit Act 1974.

 

We are seeking instructions from our client regarding your request, and willcome back to you as soon as we can.

 

We can confirm we have placed your account on hold whilst we await a response from our client and that no legal proceedings will be commenced whilst your request is outstanding.

 

I guess its a standard letter.

 

I do chuckle at the use of "our client" - presumably meaning the guy sitting at the next desk :D

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a reply to my SAR request from Canada Square Operations. In summary is says:

 

We have received your request along with a postal order for £10. We cannot accept an electronic signature. Please re-send your request with a manual signature.

 

The postal order will be sent back to you separately.

 

Its annoying they return the PO separately - and without indicating a time scale - as I'll want to use the same PO again, so can't just send a new request by return. Also, if I write to insist they act on my previous request they won't as they don't have the £10.

 

What is the best course of action on this?

 

Thank you,

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to the ICO about this. They:

 

1) Confirmed that a signature is not required for a SAR request, but that a bank, because it is dealing with financial records, may ask for a signature to compare with one they already have to confirm identity.

 

2) Canada Square were being less than helpful in the way they have handled this. (Another bank I Sar'd have written back with a letter for me to sign and an envelope).

 

3) Suggested I write a letter along the lines of: I have spoken with ICO who say that a signature is not required by the act, but on this occasion I will supply one. As for the postal order, if it has not left your building, please hold on to it. If I receive it I will post it back to you by return of post. The 40 days started from the date of the first letter.

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...