Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

House Sold near completion but repossesion hearing iminnent


adamski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3655 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have sold my house due to being unable to pay mortgage wife leaving me etc, but I have about £9,000 in arrears it is only a couple of weeks away from completion but the lender wont wait and has issued repossession hearing in about 6 weeks time.

 

I could exchange contracts any day now advice on stopping the hearing please and what happens if the lender is paid off before hearing?

 

Thanks in advance for any help or advice

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you can defend the repossession claim by attending the hearing and showing the judge paperwork to prove the sale is going through (if it has not already completed before the hearing). Will the sale pay off the mortgage completely ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they just ignore anyone who says they have a buyer for their property as they hear it often.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know full well its near completion my solicitor has written to them and they have written back, there reasoning is based on no suitable arrangement is agreed and it might fall through even though they know the buyers are first time buyers with funds in place and no chain.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the house is already sold, they're going to look stupid in court. Once sold, make sure you send a recorded delivery letter advising their money will be forthcoming. The if they still go to court it will look really baf for them and you can ask for waisted costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

and it is possible to exchange and complete on the same day, if both sides agree

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have pushed the solicitor the buyers solcitor is just finishing the final searches then we are ready to exchange I have already signed the contract and transfer deeds, now I have received court papers for the 16th june, guess I will defend and return the defences forms.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, do that. Even if you can't complete until the 16th June if contracts have been exchanged and you are due to complete on, say, the 25th June I can't see any judge giving them a repossession order.

 

However, as soon as your solicitor has exchanged he/she should write to them to let them know, give them the completion date, give an undertaking that they will be paid out of the proceeds of sale immediately completion has taken place, and ask them to cancel the hearing.

 

As goodatresearch says above, it won't look very good for them if they then continue to go to Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the dust settles on this, and if you feel up to it, do write to the Financial Conduct Authority and report your mortgage company.

 

 

I am guessing it is one of the sub-prime companies who don't listen to any dialogue and just push for repossession without taking other circumstances into account.

 

 

Under the terms of their regulation by The Financial Conduct Authority they are required to 'treat customers fairly'. Quite clearly they are not doing so in this case. Put in an official complaint, just defending it will cost them money (it will cost you nothing) and it will send out a message that these ignorant bully boys are acting well outside the terms of the required level of customer care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks born this way I shall indeed do that I shall also chase them for all the £35 charges they have put on the account.

 

I have filed my defence and I have also requested an adjournment to allow the sale to go through smoothly, I have been in contact with the sub prime mortgage lenders solicitors and sent them a letter from the buyers solcitors stating a completion date and also the memorandum of sale.

 

 

 

I think I have all the bases covered or do you guys think I have missed something?

 

Thanks for all your help so far.

Edited by adamski
typo

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tip top, got an email from the sub prime scumbags solicitors today to say the Court have adjourned this matter generally with liberty to restore and the hearing of 16 June 2014 has been vacated. so the hearing has been cancelled wonderfull, now I can breath and sell the bloody house!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Tip top, got an email from the sub prime ******s solicitors today to say the Court have adjourned this matter generally with liberty to restore and the hearing of 16 June 2014 has been vacated. so the hearing has been cancelled wonderfull, now I can breath and sell the bloody house!!

 

Well done. I am not in a similar position although not yet passed to lender's solicitors and not yet fixed a court date. It sounds like the matter was adjourned even though you had not yet exchanged? Is that right? I have been speaking to my lender and they are basically saying that until exchange takes place and a completion date fixed for certain they basically don't care that the house is sold as might fall through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes that is correct my lender took the same stance, my house has now been sold and completion is done, when I received the court summons I asked for it to be adjourned so the sale could proceed the court agreed, so the solicitors went back under their rock for a while, it gave me the time to breath and o sell the house, hold tight and good luck.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...