Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My next move...


nerfherder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I have a few old debts and I'm now at the stage where I have them pretty much under control

and I am thinking what my next move should be to try and rid myself of them for good.

 

To bring you up to speed

they are held with DCA's (Lowell is one of them) and

I have been paying nominal amounts each month to them for about a year now,

 

I was thinking about writing to them all offering full and final settlements of 10% of each

(I'm almost in a position where I could afford this) and seeing how they respond.

 

There is one that recently came out of the woodwork for an old Barclaycard

that I haven't been making payments to but I was going to try the same tactic regardless.

 

However,

reading this site for advice on the full and final offer

I saw people recommending to write to DCAs under the CCA 1974 to have sight of the agreement to see if it is enforceable.

 

This isn't something I knew you could do and

since these debts are all with DCAs and

not the original creditor

 

I was wondering how likely it would be that I may be able to get the debts written off on this basis

and if you all could offer me any advice on this process,

or on the full and final process.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are these on your CRA file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm assuming you mean on my credit report? like from experian? (sorry if I'm not up to date with the terms) To be honest I haven't asked for a copy of my credit report for a number of years, I would assume they are, but considering the saying about assumptions I'm thinking you're going to tell me there is a really important reason I should check?

 

Thanks for replying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it helps in getting the whole picture

 

typically, if a debt does not show

esp if you have been [blindly] paying a debt for years to a dca

 

there may well be a good chance of cash cowing.

 

noddle is free see below

 

just make SURE all you old addresses are showing as linked

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the date the agreement was taken out a cca request can be a good idea. It is unlikely they will write off the debt but it could be rendered unenforceable. This means they can not enforce in court but it does not mean you sit back and do nothing. Just because it is unenforceable doesn't mean the creditors won't try and get a judgement by default. I have found the first year the hardest but now most accounts are sleeping nicely

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the date the agreement was taken out a cca request can be a good idea. It is unlikely they will write off the debt but it could be rendered unenforceable. This means they can not enforce in court but it does not mean you sit back and do nothing. Just because it is unenforceable doesn't mean the creditors won't try and get a judgement by default. I have found the first year the hardest but now most accounts are sleeping nicely

 

Ah, I see.

It might not be what I was looking to do then.

I'd assume if it was unenforceable though it would give you more power in negotiation for a full and final settlement?

 

They are varying dates,

the Barclaycard one for example I've probably had since about 2005?

One of the lowell ones is a loan that I had in 2009.

 

I don't really want them to remain for long with no update on the credit file,

I'm beginning to get myself back on track debt wise and will be looking to try and get a mortgage in the next two or three years.

 

So while there may be a bad "history" on my file I wanted it to be just that, history,

with nothing in arrears when I try to get my own place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it helps in getting the whole picture

 

typically, if a debt does not show

esp if you have been [blindly] paying a debt for years to a dca

 

there may well be a good chance of cash cowing.

 

noddle is free see below

 

just make SURE all you old addresses are showing as linked

 

dx

 

Thank you for the noddle link. It's fantastic. The loan I have been repaying with lowell isn't on it, any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the key to each debt is the default date from the cra file

 

if a debt does not show

then thus its already been defaulted for more than 6yrs

so has been removed

never to return!!

 

so off you go get that file.

 

once you have that

give us a list

for each debt:

 

when was it taken out

what was the type of credit

who was the original creditor

who it is with now and what you pay

is it on your CRA file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the noddle link. It's fantastic. The loan I have been repaying with lowell isn't on it, any advice?

 

ok dear beginning to smell a cash cow here

 

get a CCA request off to them

don't sign the letter

use a blank £1 PO

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx. That's been really helpful.

 

Could I ask another noddle related question, one of my accounts is showing as "satisfied" with the balance still outstanding. It's on the open accounts list and was last updated earlier this month, is it more likely that the creditor has written this off or assigned it to another DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it still shown under the OC's name

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's on the "closed accounts" section under the original creditors name where it says it's satisfied

 

but if you drill down into the detail it shows it as being assigned.

 

On the "open accounts" section its under the DCAs name showing as default up to April 2014

but it shows as satisfied as it appears on the list on lenders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so its been sold

look at the default date on the summery line

 

it should be the same on the closed/open entries

 

what is that date?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, its the same debt,

from the original creditor on the closed accounts section to the DCA on the open accounts section.

 

It's just confusing me because under the DCAs name on the open account section it shows as satisfied.

 

I'm thinking the two possibilities are

1) They have written it off.

2) The DCA has sold it to another DCA, even though it doesn't show as debt assigned.

 

It's actually an amount I dispute I owe in the first place,

 

HP on a car which I voluntarily terminated at the halfway point of the contract and handed the car back.

 

They say I owe the balance, I say I was entitled to hand it back at the midway point in the agreement, as the contract states.

The original creditor defaulted me at the VT date, and a few months later passed it to a DCA,

I've basically ignored the DCA and tried to only deal with the original creditor,

I'm wondering if they've finally agreed I'm right. As they should ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose I should wait and see what it says next month. I think I know why the loan debt isn't showing on the report, it was a Welcome Loan that has been passed to Lowell. I saw from another thread that you posted in that the Welcome debts have been removed from credit reports pending the outcome of an investigation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a thread in the WF forum

get an sar off to welcome

bet theres loads to reclaim

what is the defaulted date

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, its the same debt,

from the original creditor on the closed accounts section to the DCA on the open accounts section.

 

It's just confusing me because under the DCAs name on the open account section it shows as satisfied.

 

I'm thinking the two possibilities are

1) They have written it off.

2) The DCA has sold it to another DCA, even though it doesn't show as debt assigned.

 

It's actually an amount I dispute I owe in the first place,

 

HP on a car which I voluntarily terminated at the halfway point of the contract and handed the car back.

 

They say I owe the balance, I say I was entitled to hand it back at the midway point in the agreement, as the contract states.

The original creditor defaulted me at the VT date, and a few months later passed it to a DCA,

I've basically ignored the DCA and tried to only deal with the original creditor,

I'm wondering if they've finally agreed I'm right. As they should ;-)

tell us more about this one, who was the oc?,do you have a copy of the hp agreement?who is chasing you for this?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The HP was with Santander.

 

They passed it to a company called Bluestone Credit Management who started writing to me about a car I never had.

 

I'm not too fussed about that one as I still have the contract and it clearly states I was within my rights to do this.

 

I sent a letter terminating the agreement with the keys and V5 document by recorded delivery

and they sent someone round to pick it up a couple of weeks later.

So I think I'm in a pretty strong position on that one.

 

dx advised me to start a thread about the Welcome Finance loan on the welcome thread,

there's more details about that one there under the title,

 

"Welcome-Finance-Loan-Lowell-CRAs" if you're interested and can offer some advice.

 

Sorry it won't let me post the link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The HP was with Santander. They passed it to a company called Bluestone Credit Management who started writing to me about a car I never had. I'm not too fussed about that one as I still have the contract and it clearly states I was within my rights to do this. I sent a letter terminating the agreement with the keys and V5 document by recorded delivery and they sent someone round to pick it up a couple of weeks later. So I think I'm in a pretty strong position on that one.

 

dx advised me to start a thread about the Welcome Finance loan on the welcome thread, there's more details about that one there under the title, "Welcome-Finance-Loan-Lowell-CRAs" if you're interested and can offer some advice.

 

Sorry it won't let me post the link.

 

 

Replied on WF thread.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA Request off to Lowell today,

 

looking at some other outstanding ones I have to do the same possibly.

 

I'm going to hold off on the SAR to Welcome at the moment, dx,

 

I'm pretty sure there is no PPI or anything,

 

if Lowell hold an enforceable CCA I'll probably go down the SAR route then to see what "might" be there.

 

Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pes i'd not do that

 

as soon as welcome sniff a dispute out comes the shredder.

 

get it done.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...