Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lookinforinfo I'll use that. @FTMDave Yep im going to do just that and calmly enjoy the process that follows.    Whats the deal with the quote thing? Is it causing an issue for the site or just an annoyance.
    • Hello, *posting on behalf of my friend, I'll provide as much info as possible*  During a pretty low point my friend moved into a social housing property, it was in a area with no family/friend connections so she started to look for a mutual exchange. She found one, signed the paper work and thought everything was okay.  She has now decided she does not want to go through with the mutual exchange. Is she legally allowed to pull out after signing the paperwork or does she have to commit to the move? Thank you,
    • Thats perfect as long as they go to my new address its all good. thanks again for the help
    • if the debts have not been sold on but only passed to the dca's to chase, then i doubt you'll ever get a letter of claim till it is sold on. OC's dont do court because of bad publicity .  if you've updated the address, then everything goes there from whomever. dx
    • Sorry so you mean it will definitely go to the new updated address? and if an address would be shared with the potential DCas then it would be the new updated one? thank you
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Looking to regain entry after repossession


misssk06
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and welcome to CAG. I've started a new thread for you so that you can have advice specific to your own situation.

 

I'm afraid we can't recommend lawyers here, you would need to look on the Law Society website which has a Find a Lawyer facility, or possibly your local CAB would have contacts.

 

But if you tell us your story on this thread, the forum guys may have suggestions for you.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello honeybee! Thank you.

 

This is an extremely complex situation,

my dads house was reposessed without his knowledge,

arrears ran upto around 13k

my mum who hid all the documentation attended court without my dads knowledge.

 

An appeal was heard at Northampton court

 

the judge did side with my mum and agreed for higher amount to be paid each month

 

however the lenders appealed this decision and dismissed a further appeal.

 

I know the actions carried out by my mother was wrong.

 

There is more to this but I dont really want to place the info on such a public forum.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, thank you. There is more to this would there be any chance I could private message all the information?

 

It's not how we normally work I'm afraid, we like advice to be on public threads so it can be reviewed by a wide audience. Let's see what the guys think about your problem when they're able to get here. :)

 

Edit: however, it's possible that if this is complex you will need professional advice. Have you tried your local CAB to see if they have relevant contacts?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay.

 

In a nutshell Kensington mortgage company sent an IFA to the property

 

some payments were made to the IFA

 

however a lumpsum of 4k which was paid to him was never transferred to Kensington.

 

After some research we uncovered some horrible truths re the IFA

(this is some thing which cannot be placed on the board).

 

The bottom line is the whole situation has been one big mess.

 

The IFA in question advised my mum he could sort out the matter without my dad knowledge.

Edited by honeybee13
Asking for PM contact.
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the answer to the above question is 'yes', then the process has been correct, insofar as the court is concerned. Your mother has deceived your father, and he may have a claim against her.

 

If the answer to the above question is 'no' and your father is the sole mortgagor, then the possession proceedings can be challenged on the basis that your father was not aware they were taking place - however you WILL need a solicitor as the arguments are complex given that possession has already been taken.

 

If Kensington sent the IFA, then they are also responsible for his actions - so there is another potential claim there - against the IFA and against Kensington since he was obviously acting under their authority to try to resolve the arrears.

 

Go to the Law Society webpage (google the words 'find a solicitor') so that you can locate one in your area who specialises in repossessions. Do not use any of those online companies that claim to be able to help you for a fixed fee - this is not something they'd be able to deal with effectively.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are your parents joint mortgage holders?
no the mortgage was solely in my fathers name, Just as I thought the repo hadn't been carried out correctly! I will be making a few phone calls tomorrow. Don't worry I will be looking for an actual solicitor who has expertise in this area.

 

I will also be making a complaint re: Kensington to the FInancial Services Omsbudman. I'll keep you up to date with the situation. Thank you very much for getting back to me :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...r-repossession

 

and I bet there were heaps of unlawful arrears fees too.

and visit fees

 

Hi

Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating

borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interestlink3.gif and tell them not to add any

more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/p...y-the-FSA.html

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/library/commun...2010/065.shtml

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010...mortgages-fine

http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/news...nfair-mortgage-terms/2005762.article

 

IMHO kennys are responsible here.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your father is going to have to act extremely quickly - and whatever action he takes will implicate his wife...just so you know that.

 

It's going to be a bit of an uphill struggle - so I'd suggest that the first point would be to speak directly to Kensington, inform them that your father will be taking action and ask if they are willing to allow re-entry and accept whatever payment proposal your father is willing to put forward.

 

That said - your mother is going to be in a difficult position (as well as just how did she manage to keep not only the accruing arrears, but also the initial court case, the subsequent court case AND the appeals without him knowing?)...

 

Don't get your hopes up - if your mother told the mortgagee that she was acting with full agreement from her husband (and she'd have had to show the court a letter of authority from your father to act on his behalf there), then your father's actions may open up a can of worms for her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are nearly £2-3k worth of charges on the account. This is something I will be exploring!

 

Lea I understand the implications mum acted on the IFA's advise, I'm not sure if you've seen the pm sent to HoneyBee13. I'm just wondering if I can send it too you there is more information available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dealing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...