Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MMF ltd - OFT complaints thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

I've been reading the various forums regarding this company from afar for the last few days. I have two payday loans which have been passed to MMF on 13 February and so have a personal interest. To give some background, I worked for a debt management company for ten years and so have relatively strong knowledge of the tactics employed by DCAs. This company seems to have stooped to new levels in terms of blatant disregard for acceptable debt collection practises.

 

This morning I emailed the OFT summarising the complaints highlighted in this forum in the various threads. I have asked them for advice on the best way to proceed with key questions as to whether it is 'safe' for me to (1) communicate with them and (2) send payments to them.

 

To be very clear, I want to pay my debts back, but at an affordable rate and in the knowledge payments will reduce my debts. I expect this will be the same for most people who are experiencing problems with MMF.

 

I will try to upload the email I sent to the OFT onto this thread for evidence of action - my simple request is that all of you people who are suffering at the hands of MMF take action and register the Complaint with the OFT - it is a numbers game, the more complaints they receive, the more they will listen!

 

I would ask anyone who has made a complaint, or is considering doing so, to post on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have complained to the OFT about this cancerous bunch of muppets, I have also been in contact with my MP who has written to them regarding their illegal and intimidating practices which breach every rule laid down by the OFT.

My own actions have included a letter which revokes any implied right they may have had to call at my home without an appointment, I have also informed them that communication with me is to be only by letter, no phone calls or texts and that any breach of this instruction will result in a harassment complaint made to the police.

My MP has informed me that he will be in touch with me when MMF reply to his letter, I doubt they will reply as they have form for not replying to anything.

Their operators are unreasonable and will pressure you into setting up an unrealistic payment plan over the phone and require you to leave your debit card details which they will use to empty your account. If you are planning on paying them set up a standing order at your bank with an amount you can afford.

Under NO circumstances give these low life's any bank or card details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response Mark.

 

My primary concern is that I want to repay my debts, but how can we trust that any money sent to them will be allocated to the balance? I've outlined this and other concerns to the OFT in my email and will update the thread on any response I receive.

 

I truly believe that there needs to be a focus on following through with complaints to encourage action - I'm worried most people are not doing this and are focussing too much on trying to reach an arrangement directly with MMF.

 

Does anyone have experience of MMF's approach when their debt is included on a debt management plan? Are they more or less responsive/open to arrangements if so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that if you set up a standing order each amount paid every month will be shown leaving your account on your statement. If MMF then decide not to knock the amount off and still harass you for money ignore them, complain further to the OFT and let them try and take you to court as you can provide an audit able paper trail that shows regular payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that if you set up a standing order each amount paid every month will be shown leaving your account on your statement. If MMF then decide not to knock the amount off and still harass you for money ignore them, complain further to the OFT and let them try and take you to court as you can provide an audit able paper trail that shows regular payments.

My complaint to the ICO and the OFT is that MMF are willing to retrospectively falsify notices of assignments. I was able to prove this because the fabricated NOA they sent me had my current address. At the date they claimed to have sent it they held a different address. MMF claimed in an earlier response to my complaint that they had purchased a debt from Mackenzie hall who had given an old address. They said that they had received my current address from call credit when they checked my file. The date that they claimed the NOA was sent was prior to MMF obtaining that address. Schoolboy error.

A few years prior to that MacKenzie hall had claimed HFC Bank had sold them the same debt. When asked to prove ownership of the debt MH could not provide their assignment letters and closed the case accepting that they could not show they owned the debt. How could they possibly assign something they did not own. Incidentally the HFC debt was never owed. I have received a hundred pounds and apology from MH but MMF have no integrity and are prepared to blatently lie and deceive. I have kept the paperwork in case the ICO or OFT ever feel inclined to do something positive. Its a numbers game. I urge people to complain to their MP the OFT and media. These practice's need stopping

Link to post
Share on other sites

MMF are currently trying to get me to pay a statue barred debt from 2007, like a couple of other people I have seen, so far they only seem to be bending the truth to their own ends.

 

If you could advise if there is a reference number or something to put on our complaints to the FOS please let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...