Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells/carter claim form - old O2 debt


jay32mcr
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received this letter today from Lowell exactly 1 day after another letter was received.

 

Claim Form

 

Claimant:

 

LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD

RE: LOWELL FINANCIAL LIMITED

REGISTERED OFFICE

ENTERPRISE HOUSE

1 APEX VIEW

LEEDS

LS11 9BH

 

Address for sending documents and payments (if different)

 

BRYAN CARTER SOLICITORS LLP

11 DE HAVILLAND DRIVE

WEYBRIDGE SURREY

KT13 0YP

 

Particulars of Claim:

 

THIS CLAIM IS FOR 577.00 THE AMOUNT

DUE UNDER AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR AND THE DEFENDANT

TO PROVIDE FINANCE AND / OR SERVICES AND / OR GOODS.

 

THIS DEBT WAS ASSIGNED TO / PURCHASED BY

Lowell Portfolio I LTD

ON 23/11/2011 AND NOTICE SERVED

PURSUANT TO THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925

 

PARTICULARS

Re: O2 (UK) LTD

A/C No 1234567890

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 577.00

 

THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS INTEREST PERSUANT

TO S69 COUNTY COURT ACT 1984 FROM 23/12/2011

TO DATE AT 8% PER ANNUM AMOUNTING TO

97.91

 

AMOUNT CLAIMED 674.91

COURTS FEE 55.00

SOLICITORS COST 70.00

TOTAL AMOUNT 799.91

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Prior to this we have been sent letters from Red, Hamptons Legal, Moorecroft, etc

 

As we are both on ESA due to my disability we are not entirely sure what this means and how a county court judgement would even have an effect on a couple who are already living below their means.

 

Please advice on the next course of action.

 

We have tried contacting Moorecroft and Hamptons about proof of the debt but rather foolishly we didn't send these via registered/recorded mail so there was no proof it was even received.

Edited by jay32mcr
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please let us know the issue date of the claim - top right hand corner of the form, then we can let you know the timeline you have.

 

You will need to send a CCA request to Lowells - include £1.00 and send the request via Recorded Delivery.

 

You could send a CPR 31.14 request to the solicitors - which is free, but I doubt you would receive a response from them.

 

Do you wish to defend the claim or admit it ? If you are going to admit, then you would need to complete the form that came with your pack - and return it. I dont know whether you need to send it to the court or the solicitor - will ask someone to look in and advise further on that.

 

Are you still making payments to the account - if not, when did you stop and why ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Date on the top of the page is 05 FEB 2014

 

Admitting it would be the quickest option as it is owed however for it to jump from all those different collectors to be returned to the original the price should be in Account Claimed: £577.00

 

I did contact them approx 3 years ago to try and ask for a goodwill gesture but they refused point blank so i haven't made any payments yet because i tried to come to an arrangement but they wanted in excess of £40 per month.

 

 

*Would a CCA apply in terms of a mobile phone contract?

Edited by jay32mcr
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, your timeline is..

 

Date of issue 05.02.2014 + 5 days for service = 10.02.2014 + 14 days to acknowledge = 24.02.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 10.03.2014

 

Ah.. right, I didnt realise this was a Mobile phone account, in which case you are correct, there will be no agreement as such.

 

However, you can definitely request that they provide you with a breakdown of the monies being claimed.

 

Do you agree that the figure of £577.00 is owed ? that seems to be an awful lot for a Mobile phone account ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the story:

 

My girlfriend and I purchased 2 mobile contracts for 24 months each at £35 per month.

 

Then we were forced to move to another part of the UK due to family issues and really needed money to pay removal so reluctantly we sold the handsets.

 

The contract remained however my girlfriend was contacted for a £577 debt also but given a choice to pay £138 to resolve the issue there and then which she did.

 

I was out of communication during this time (relationship issues) and did not return for approx 8 months.

 

In that time there was no communication between debtors and myself.

 

Then approximately a year and a half afterwards i was contacted by lowell with the same price to pay and i contacted them to try and agree a plan of action however they were not as friendly to me as they were to my now Wife and said its all or nothing.

 

I told them it just wasn't possible to make any sort of bulk payment due to my circumstances and asked if it was possible to set up a monthly option which they agreed to but would not accept anything less than £40 per month which i couldn't afford.

I explained this to them but was treated to the regular debt collectors threats of bailiffs and ccjs etc but they just wouldn't accept anything less so i said i would get back to them.

 

Then came the endless daily phone calls which stopped after informing them i would no longer conduct business in any other way than letters.

 

The debt was passed to all the usual Lowell companies who each time would not offer any significant reduction so i ignored them.

 

Then today the Claim form for Northhampton (CCBC) came and now my wife is worried about the implications.

 

So to recap. 2 contract phones, 1 paid with a huge reduction and 1 outstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps so you sold the handset that was not really yours to sell....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
One more question. The Debt is in the Surname XXXXX and my wifes surname now she's married is not XXXXX. Would that make a difference?

 

No makes no odds...previous maiden name is still legal.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...