Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tribunal coming up, money worries - ** WON **


trev1865
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3219 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks, wife is really not well at moment, she cancelled her first wca medical and ive grave doubts she will attend the second one..what i want to know is if she tells them she cant make it will her esa stop immediatly? or i have seen comments that she will be sent a form bf223 asking why? will she keep benefits until the bf223 is sent back to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

update..waiting on dwp decision following return of bf223 form..however my wife and even myself had letters in the meantime telling us to go for a work focused interview at the local jobcentre.this would have been sent before any decision on the bf223 form was made.

confused why they are calling me in? only thing i can think is because my wife claims for me on her esa? i didnt think she did and i have never had any letter or medical to go to for years..anyone clear this up for me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

ok so a few months have passed since my last post..my wife has had another atos medical and is waiting..today she got a txt from dwp saying they are reviewing her esa and a decision maker will phone in 5 working days..she is not good on the phone so im wondering does anyone know if this phone call is to tell her the decision.or some kind of interview re the atos medical? i also want to prepare for any mandatory reconsideration if she has to do this so we are without income for as short a time as possible if the decision goes against her..any advice on this please?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

sometimes the calls are to clarify issues that may lead to more points being awarded (or support group). Other times the call is to go through the actual decision which is being found fit to work. No way of knowing which. Your wife can be assisted by you on the phone is she has difficulties.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have informed my wife the medical found her fit for work and advised her to claim jsa whilst she asks for a mandatory reconsideration. she can get information to support the reconsideration from her doctor but we have seen advice online not to do that at this stage as it will delay the reconsideration process? anyone advise if they think she should do this or any other tips/advice as we are very worried at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reconsideration doesn't take long; (a few weeks, I do believe) so I have a feeling that what you've been told is right. Appeals generally take longer to be heard; so if it does go to appeal, you could then start gathering evidence then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

update..wife still on mr now for 10 wks..jobcentre putting pressure on her jsa forcing weekly signing..if they sanction her jsa does it affect her esa when she goes back on it please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

update..wife still on mr now for 10 wks..jobcentre putting pressure on her jsa forcing weekly signing..if they sanction her jsa does it affect her esa when she goes back on it please?

 

I'm not an expert on JCP issues - hopefully others will come along, but weekly signings and pressure seems highly inappropriate for someone waiting to appeal an ESA decision. Has she seen the disability adviser at the jcp?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

they mentioned about a disability advisor but nothing done yet..still not clear if any sanction would carry over to esa?

 

A sanction will not affect her ESA if ESA is reinstated following a Mandatory Reconsideration or appeal. I agree that weekly signing is not appropriate for a person waiting for the results of an ESA appeal or MR.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

another update,,today the mr decision came and sure enough they have not changed there negative decision.

can we sign off jsa strait away or is it best to keep signing on till we know we are getting esa during the appeal we are going to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks thats what my wife wants to do but my question is will the dwp let her?

or will they for example say we have to recieve confirmation of your appeal from the courts before allowing her to swap back to esa? we are ringing them soon so im interested to get some opinions before we do that

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll need confirmation you've made the appeal first, they won't just say 'ok, we'll put you back on esa, no problem' without evidence you're entitled.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

:trev1865:

 

To confirm, any sanctions that Jobcentreplus try to impose for not signing weekly won't affect assessment rate employment n support pending appeal to a tribunal. And while we're on these issues, anyone who's lodged a valid appeal against a fit for work decision can't be forced to start the work programme whichever benefit s/he's in receipt of.

 

What you've been told today is absolute twaddle. Think I've mentioned earlier in this thread that, through no fault of their own, the contact centre staff aren't particularly well trained. At this stage your wife can make a new claim for employment n support, but it won't be paid until she's had another work capability assessment cos it's within six months of a decision that she's fit for work.

 

To move her situation forward, she needs to lodge a formal appeal to the Tribunals Service. You need form SSCS1 and the guide SSCS1a;

 

Can't get the links to work :frusty:, you'll have to go via the link below and click on 'Forms';

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/sscs

 

Cos Government don't want to pay ESA pending appeal there's no formal guidance about how to apply. Best method that I've found is to sign off jobseekers at next signing day after receipt of acknowledgment of appeal. And on the same day send a photocopy of the acknowledgement, Med 3 (unfit) note, and written request for assessment rate ESA pending appeal to the address on the last letter received from Jobcentreplus. (Preferably via recorded delivery, or at least hold onto the receipt for postage.)

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Amended Legislation:

 

For repeat claims to employment n support allowance on or after 30 March 15, for the same condition, the claimant will have to provide evidence of a worsened condition to be treated as having limited capability for work and be paid assessment rate. Whether it's six months or six years since a fit for work determination by Jobcentreplus or a tribunal!!

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much margeret,

i tried to tell the guy i was sure he was wrong but i do wonder if they are just told to lie to get people off benefit.

as usual i will take your excellent advise

one thing,i dont fully undrstand the extra bit you put in..does it refer to a new claim for esa after 30 march?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:trev1865:

 

Praps we should speculate as to whether, or not, Government ministers care about accurate advice from Jobcentreplus and leave it at that.

 

The extra bit I put in doesn't affect your wife for her current claim. It will affect repeat new claims, for the same condition, for employment n support from 30 March 15.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/794/contents/made

 

As amended by;

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/437/made

 

From 30 March 15, claimants who make a new repeat claim for employment n support, for the same condition after a fit for work determination, will have to evidence to a decision maker that their condition (or the functional effects of their condition) have worsened before they can be treated as having limited capability for work and paid assessment rate.

 

Should your wife need some documentary support to claim assessment rate employment n support pending her appeal hearing;

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/appeals-process-changes-for-dwp-benefits-and-child-maintenance

 

You need; Appeals reform: questions and answers

 

Then the heading; Payment pending appeal

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...