Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Phil and Alison v The Co-op ***WON***


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5875 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Our case did not get to Court, the Co-Op paid out in full after they filed an Acknowledge of Service and a Defence but caved in before a court date was given. The Court has been notified of the settlement, we have not yet made any request for costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

I suceeded in getting all my statements from Northern Bank going back to 1987. They told the ICO they were on microfiche and that they wouldnt supply them because it would take disproportionate effort to comply with my SAR.

 

The ICO told them they most certainly would supply them or face prosecution.

 

I recieved my statements 10 days later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic letter it should be in the temlates library or at least a sticky

 

Hear !!! hear !!

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The hearing of the claimant's application for An Order To Remove The Stay will take place at 14:00 on the 21 September 2007 at Derby County Court, Combined Court Centre, Morledge, Derby, DEI 2XE.

Cases are listed in accordance with local hearing arrangements determined by the Judiciary and implemented by court staff. Every effort is made to ensure that hearings start either at the time specified or as soon as possible thereafter. However, listing practices or other factors may mean that delay is unavoidable. Furthermore, in some instances a case may be released to another judge, possibly at a different court. Please contact the court for further information on the listing arrangements that may apply to your hearing.

What do I need to do now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you don't need to take the normal bundle as they will not be considering the substantive issue of the claim.

 

Use the templates for the application for removal. You could also print off a list of settled cases from the litigation section. I don't think the Co-op was part of the OFT agreement but you might want to check this. If not you could perhaps mention this in your application. There is also a Newspaper article whick is linked in the stickies where the OFT suggests that the test case may not go ahead. You could mention that in your application and print off the article to take with you. If you mention the Human Rights Act and the Civil Procedure Rules you will need to print these off also.

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hello,

I am Phatram's daughter...

 

I have had an account with the Co-op since I was 10. Over the years I have upgraded this to be able to have a cash card - Visa Electron - and recently I phoned them up to ask if I could upgrade it further to have a Visa Debit Card.

 

I am 19, at Univesity and moved into my own home. For the last year or so, my parents have been battling with the Co-op to claim back thier bank charges - and suceeded - and are now in the middle of another battle.

 

I applied for my Visa Debit over the phone and they said I would receive a letter in the next few days - at this point I was still living with my parents. After not receiving a letter, I telephoned them again and was told the application did not go through. I completed another one, aswel as changing my address to the flat where I now live.

 

Whilst I was on the phone to the gentlman, he mentioned my Father's name - so it was obvious that they had linked me to my parent's battle with the bank.

 

I finally received a letter from the bank saying I was unsucessful in my application for a Visa Debit Card. The letter says they take into account:

1. The amount of time the account has been open - this has been since I was 10!

2. How often I use the account - This is now a secondary account to my Halifax Student Account because they offered me a better deal. AND I have £780 invested with the Co-op for my upcoming holiday! So how dare they say I dont use it!!

 

I am appliying for the card so I can use it in all shops and even abroad when I go on holiday - I have one with the Halifax already so Visa have already accepted me for this.

 

Does anyone else see this as retalitory act towards me because of my family name? I want to close my aco**** down with them now as I could easily go to another bank and get the service I want.

 

Can anyone help and tell me what do to?!

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you're a student most banks will be happy to have your custom and give you a current account with a debit card. It's quite possible that the actions of the Co-op are retaliatory but you'll never get them to admit it and they'll just state general reasons why you did not qualify. Best to just close your account and go elsewhere I would think.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to co-op Advice Please
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...