Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
    • Not at all.  The onus is on them to ensure that their invoice respects the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to establish keeper liability.  Which it can't as the area is covered by bye-laws. Spot on. Irrelevant as to whether you entered into a contract with VCS to pay them £100 if you didn't obey what was written on their silly signs. Who cares?  What about their ridiculous generic Particulars of Claim where they deliberately mix up driver and keeper. And where do they mention this?  You haven't shown us anything. Of course you have to prepare a Witness Statement and you'd better get on with it. This is the problem here - you've disappeared for months & months, haven't kept us updated and presumably haven't read other VCS threads.  That needs to change - now. Otherwise you will lose - simple as that. For a start - please upload the court order which fixes the hearing date plus plus where "VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet".  We're not mind readers.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Phil and Alison v The Co-op ***WON***


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We started paying charges back in 1985 when we went into business.

We cant get the info off the Coop so using what we have already claimed back at their unauthorised rate of interest, 29%,thought we would do a spreadsheet out of interest.

The amount it says we are owed is.......

£3,913634.43.

Will of course let you know what they say when they get back to us!!!

:D :D :D :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Cool

 

I'd go for it mate.

 

If you have already sucessfully claimed at 29% there should be no reason why this should be different unless they are going to prove.

 

I would think that they would defend this one. This could be THE case we are all waiting to happen

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will watch with interest --- good luck ;)

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Divided charges etc from last 6 years to give us an estimate.

Going to do it properly when got time as we were only messing about with figures.

I think when done properly it will be around the £500-£1000 mark.The idea would be to make them prove what the correct figure is.

Figure I get is £601, now for a spreddie !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I would see several problems here.

 

Firstly, the level of charges has increased well above the rate of inflation over the period in question. It is likely that in the early years you were only charged £3 or £4, maybe even less.

 

Secondly, as the Claimant, you will be expected to provide proof of each charge levied. No Judge would be prepared to accept an argument that put the onus on the Defendant to prove that they had NOT levied a charge.

 

The bank has no legal obligation to keep transactional information as far back as you are claiming. Whilst there is some debate that the Inland Revenue and Banking Regulations MIGHT suggest that records be kept for 12 years, clearly the data Protection Act only provides for 6 years.

 

Without proof that the bank are withholding older records, your case would fail.

 

I would also suggest that using the unauthorised interest rate would not be accepted - some judges are even reluctant to allow ordinary contractual interest.

 

Finally, and most important of all, a claim of this amount will be allocated to multi-track. This means that you are liable to face the full legal costs of the Defendant, if you fail to prove your case. It is likely that those costs could be as much as £10,000.

 

Even if the value is reduced, and it goes into Fast Track, a Judge is still likely to award costs if he was to feel that the case was never likely to succeed.

 

Having said all of that, I would expect a claim based on the calculation process you have suggested to be responded to by an application for a strike out - and I would expect that strike out to be successful.

 

Whatever decision you come to over this claim, I would advise that you obtain proper legal advise, otherwise this "laugh" could turn into a very sick joke indeed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi am I correct in my calculations, The coop charged me in 1996 34.49% interest for going overdrawn and i have charges of around £2000 dating back to that time (i have all my statements) 2.50% per month. At the compounded contractual interest rate dating back to 1996 would the figure be around £27k. I think I may have made a mistake on my schedule of charges, at 8% its around the 4k mark. Ive checked it a couple of times and it still shows the same figures, I cant believe it could add up to that much... any advice would be most helpful GC:shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Phatram

The uncooperative wrote to me on 16th may and offered to pay my charges with compounded interest dating back to Jan 2000, of course the £513.87 charges + compound interest over 6 years does not add up to £896.54, also Jan 2000 is going back 7 years not 6 as they stated, just sent them a new schedule of charges with the same rate of interest I was charged for breaches (2.5% monthly) which adds up to £4623.33 and rising by 47p each day so waiting for the reply, just goes to show that they are willing (if only on paper) to repay charges further than 6 years even if its not at the correct calculation, they did not put in the letter what rate of interest they were paying but I think it is around 9-10%..GC

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years ago we were persuaded to take out a loan to pay off O/D, I think it was for 4000.00. We have since had two more loans both of which were to again pay off O/D and previous loan. Present loan is for 10K.

How do we start to claim back interest etc? Have read loads but just don't understand it.

These loans were from the COOP and on all occasions someone rang us up to explain how much better off we would be if we had a loan off them !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years ago we were persuaded to take out a loan to pay off O/D, I think it was for 4000.00. We have since had two more loans both of which were to again pay off O/D and previous loan. Present loan is for 10K.

How do we start to claim back interest etc? Have read loads but just don't understand it.

These loans were from the Co-Op and on all occasions someone rang us up to explain how much better off we would be if we had a loan off them !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats an interesting one as such.

the thing is the banks do never acknowledge that the charges are unlawfull. all they do is make goodwill payments against them.

 

now if there were a way to get around that, then you had to take the loan out because they levied unlawfully charges against you, that they acknowledge as such. so it would have a legal footing.

plus you would have to prove that ALL the O/D & interest was ONLY as a result of bank charges too.

 

then bobs your uncle, they would have to pay you back literally everything, loans, the interest on the loan & interest on that money that you could of invested elsewhere.

 

legal minefield me thinks, but interesting.......

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just received a phone call from DAVID SPENCER at the Co-Op concerning our account.

I asked him how much copy statements are and how far back can I order them from, to which he replied

ALL OF THEM FROM YOUR ACCOUNT OPENING, ITS ARCHIVED!!!.

I am b***dy fuming.

This proves they do not comply and did not comply with our S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

I am reporting this to the information commissioner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just received a phone call from DAVID SPENCER at the Co-Op concerning our account.

I asked him how much copy statements are and how far back can I order them from, to which he replied,

FIVE POUNDS EACH AND ALL OF THEM FROM YOUR ACCOUNT OPENING, ITS ARCHIVED!!!.

I am b***dy fuming.

This proves they do not comply and did not comply with our S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...