Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Gross Misconduct


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3902 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am after some advice on how to help my daughter, she has been found guilty of a gross misconduct charge, she works in a well known retail store, 6 hours on a Sunday. During a discount week she was shopping with her aunt and went to the store where she works. Her Aunt wanted to purchase some goods and the cashier suggested my daughter uses her staff discount card also (the transaction was authorized by a manager). A few weeks later my daughter was told she was being investigated, and subsequently given an 12 month final written warning for gross misconduct. She has just turned 18, never been in trouble and always punctual etc, and it seems like they want her to leave so that they can employ younger staff, cheaper (i may be looking in to it too deeply).

 

We are now able to appeal and would like some advice of how to approach it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have relocated your thread to the Employment forums where I am sure you will receive advice soon.

 

Most of the advisors in this area have day jobs so will be around later in the day.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Her Aunt wanted to purchase some goods and the cashier suggested my daughter uses her staff discount card also

 

Uses whose discount card? Your daughters or the cashiers?

 

A few weeks later my daughter was told she was being investigated, and subsequently given an 12 month final written warning for gross misconduct

 

A few weeks? Was there an investigation already happening? Why the long delay? Did your daughter call a representative to accompany her to the disciplinary meeting? Was she notified in advance? What happened to the manager who signed off the transaction ( ultimately HIS responsibility, NOT your daughters)? WHat happened with the cashier who processed the transaction?

 

 

There are a lot of unanswered questions here, and depending on the answers, you could have a solid base for an appeal. All we have right now is third hand info, when we need concrete facts to help you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although many people do it there will be a clause in the contract that says who can and can not use the discount card. Breach of this will be gross misconduct and leave you liable to summary dismissal without notice. It seems your daughter has escaped that for whatever reason, I would think there were some mitigating circumstances.

If she works 6 hours a week she has little if no employment protection, I may not agree, it is just a fact

 

Renegade is correct that there should be procedures in place but to be honest as she still has her job I would chalk it down to experience and move on

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally i would agree fletch, but even that she only works 6 hours a week, the employer still has to follow rules and procedure and treat everyone fairly. If the other 2 people involved didnt recieve any action, and the disciplinary procedure wasnt followed, then she has a valid cause for an appeal. Now, whether she appeals is totally up to her.

 

But s you say fletch, if she is only working 6 hours a week, then its relatively easy to keep a low profile and just keep out of trouble. The problem lies in does she accept being accused of something that was out of her control and was suggested by another member of staff AND signed off by a manager?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I firmly believe that rules should be followed be they in employment law, criminal law , financial agreements etc I think my views on that are well known.

 

My worry is that should this be fought then they may just cut their losses and get rid, also if the other employees refuse to comment on what happened to them there is nothing that can be done. data protection and all that.

 

Of course if there has been a breach of procedure an appeal on those grounds while admitting the mistake could work

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your responses,

 

in answer to renegade

- it was my daughters discount card.

- it was 4 weeks from the incident to the hearing, she was told of the investigation, and given the opportunity of a colleague to accompany

-she was given the details of the investigation and hearing in writing.

-no mention of a punishment for the manager, are they obliged to tell us? the cashier was punished but only a note on her file.

 

I have been going over this and often think, is it worth it, its only 6 hours. its the princple, she enjoys her little job and thinks they are making an example of her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i said what i thought here, the mods would action my account. Ive ran into something similar before when i was a union rep. It really does look like a jobsworth manager singling her out and to make an example. However, for 6 hours a week, and less than 2 years service, Fletch is right. She would have little to no rights and could easily be dismissed. What i find concerning is that the manager signed it off and doesnt seem to have had anything done, yet the cashier has. Of course, disciplinaries are a personal matter between the company and the accused.

 

Can i ask who told you that the cashier had a note on the file?

 

 

if you wanted to appeal it, there is certainly a good basis to do so, but if i am 100% honest, i would follow fletchs advice. You could go down the appeal route, but remember, the punishment could also increase as well as decrease. It is up to your daughter if she really wants to appeal against it and risk dismissal.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't realize the punishment could get worse.

 

I think the question has been answered for me, this is the first time i have used a forum for anything, so thank you guys its been really beneficial.

 

I will have to think of another way to cause these people a headache and create a load of work for them:x

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whenever you appeal a disciplinary the punishment can always increase as well as decrease in severity. Thats why you need to make 100% sure of any facts surrounding the case before you appeal.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

mark,

 

if they wanted to get rid and make an example of her, they would have. You are over thinking this and should be careful not to let your paranoia upset your daughter. Head down, model employee from now on, and it'll all blow over!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that yes maybe they have made an example of her, however they have also potentially tied their own hands in future. They have to be seen to be consistent and as such they might have problems if they dismissed someone for the same offence with similar circumstances

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...