The Hounds @ MMF / Motor Mile Finance

[BRIGADIER2JCS]

Totally agree Brig

Which is why I'm a tad sceptic about the letter :-\ if you can understand why ^_^

 

Do you think this should be flagged for future reference?

Personal reasoned opinion.

 

NO, it appears to me from the tone of the 'solicitors' letter that he is being fed only the information that his masters want action upon and has NO idea of what has gone before, this has been a scenario with may companies in the past, puppet solicitors kept in the dark.

 

The easiest comparison though not in house is Carter who is 'instructed' on cases that are SB or otherwise unen and has to withdraw when a defence is put forward.

 

Challenging this 'solicitor' now and laying all the 'real' facts before him could be very effective, it certainly can do no harm!!

Edited September 22, 2013 by ims21

[fkofilee]

Well the envelope came in handwritten and also the letter looks like its had a mail merge done to it because of the "Creditor >" Element.

Oh Bryan Carter.... Wouldnt i love to see him drown in Pighsh*t... Wait no thats ... not enough ^__^

[BRIGADIER2JCS]

Well the envelope came in handwritten and also the letter looks like its had a mail merge done to it because of the "Creditor >" Element.

Oh Bryan Carter.... Wouldnt i love to see him drown in Pighsh*t... Wait no thats ... not enough ^__^

 

Amateurish as usual. I say let's lay the facts in front of the puppet solicitor (if he exists:madgrin:)

[fkofilee]

Agree

[BRIGADIER2JCS]

Agree

 

I'll go through the thread in detail and collate the information is date order and bullet point each MMF item will leave blanks for dates Refs etc., for you to fill I, if not completed today will post up tomorrow PM.

Edited September 22, 2013 by ims21

[fkofilee]

Thanks Brig... Lets see how this goes... ^__^

Youve already seen the 2 letters they have sent claiming "These re the CCA Agreements"

 

Also no rush

[BRIGADIER2JCS]

For Info;

 

Law Society Records:

 

Chatrath, Neal.

 

ID:366646

Admitted: 01/09/2011

 

Spec: Banking Law

Business Affairs (whatever that means?)

Commercial Litigation

Comm. property

Convey: Residential.

 

Higher Audience NO:

 

Sounds like lower level fee earner/salaried.

[fkofilee]

Interesting.... Surely they would invest in the best commercial litigants?

Edited September 22, 2013 by fkofilee

[DonkeyB]

Thanks Brig... Lets see how this goes... ^__^

Youve already seen the 2 letters they have sent claiming "These re the CCA Agreements"

 

Also no rush

 

I don’t think those letters actually claim to be the CCAs – they simply list the accounts. Did you actually part with your £1 per agreement, requesting the CCAs? It’s not clear that you did.

 

Either way, as I mentioned earlier, your sole action here should be to simply state that the original creditor is the victim of identity fraud and they have bought lemons. You are not the victim here, so you have to report nothing. The police wouldn’t do much anyway – their bluster in the letter about how the police will check your ID is so blatantly intimidating as to border on harassment. Interesting how they can tell the police what to do. Again, misrepresenting the legal position.

 

State that if they do take legal action, you will counterclaim for exemplary damages.

 

The ‘solicitor’ (clearly a rubbish one) is misrepresenting the true legal position as he is aware of a valid dispute on the account. That’s worthy of a complaint to the SRA. Should pee him off a bit.

[fkofilee]

I don’t think those letters actually claim to be the CCAs – they simply list the accounts. Did you actually part with your £1 per agreement, requesting the CCAs? It’s not clear that you did.

 

Either way, as I mentioned earlier, your sole action here should be to simply state that the original creditor is the victim of identity fraud and they have bought lemons. You are not the victim here, so you have to report nothing. The police wouldn’t do much anyway – their bluster in the letter about how the police will check your ID is so blatantly intimidating as to border on harassment. Interesting how they can tell the police what to do. Again, misrepresenting the legal position.

 

State that if they do take legal action, you will counterclaim for exemplary damages.

 

The ‘solicitor’ (clearly a rubbish one) is misrepresenting the true legal position as he is aware of a valid dispute on the account. That’s worthy of a complaint to the SRA. Should pee him off a bit.

 

All very very valid points from you Donkey

I dont see why i should have to go to the police on this one... Its ridiculous..

 

But if it has to be done it has to be done... Ive already said something about this to the police a while ago but this company do take the entire Cake!!!!

[fkofilee]

Okay update.

 

After a quick phone call to establish the status of the accounts and if they are frozen currently. They said no and it's been transferred to their legal team?!

 

I don't know whether this is a pressure tactic or not. I refuse to cave in.

 

BRIG... Any ideas on this one?

[fkofilee]

Donkey

 

I asked MMF to report it for me and they told me they are not in their remit too :-\

[BRIGADIER2JCS]

Ahhh the 'legal team' of one Neil Chatrath:madgrin:.

 

Only seen one letter from him so far! Doesn't seem to have much history/experience.

[fkofilee]

Hi Brig

 

I reported it to actionfraud... Although i couldnt give them much information :/ For that reason i dont think they will beable to investigate it

MMF Advised "Ill get our complaints manager to contact Actionfraud this afternoon?!?!?"

 

If Mr Ellisshaw has nothing better to do these days :/

 

Brig do you ever have time to write that letter?

Edited September 25, 2013 by fkofilee