Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Caught driving with provisional


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Brother in law, has just been caught driving on a provisional license.

 

The circumstances behind it are.

 

He owns a car, in which he practices driving with a qualified driver, it is fully taxed, mot'd and insured.

 

He was asked by a disabled man, whom he has known for a long time if he could take him to a local shop to collect a washing machine as his had broken down,

this man had held a driving license for a number of years and to his knowledge still held this license,

it was only when they were stopped by the police the man told him that he surrendered his license under medical grounds a couple of years before.

 

Obviously when questioned by the police, he explained that he did not have a full license and why he was driving,

while sympathetic their hands were tied and they had to impound his car.

 

My question is, is there any point in him trying to plead mitigating circumstances?

 

I (and he) knows that ignorance to the law is no excuse, but he just presumed that because he had seen this gent driving daily

since he was a child that he still had a full driving license.

 

In reality all he wants to do is avoid the points on his license so he can continue to learn to drive and get his full license.

(6 points for driving without insurance - insurance invalidated due to not having a qualified driver)

 

Many thanks in advance for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no mitigating circumstances.

 

He was driving with a provisional licence, and was not under the supervision of a current full licence holder who has 3 or more years driving experience.

All the court would say is it is up to him to check that the other person did indeed hold a licence. Taking their word for it wont wash in court.

 

Unless he gets a very sympathetic judge, he needs to be ready for those points and possible DQ period for driving on a provisional licence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your prompt reply.

That's what I thought, Do you know the process from now, will he receive a summons or just get a straight ban / points and fine.

Is it worth him trying to write in if he gets a summons and explain himself?

many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I though it was 3 point for driving without ins? [is Scotland diff - i'm up here]

 

 

IMHO it IS worth outlining the circumstances

inc, if the gent would oblige, a statement from him, that he did not tell your brother etc etc

 

was he displaying L plates too?

 

and go in person to court too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6-8 points for no insurance. 3-6 for driving otherwise than in accordance with a licence. Same in Scotland as in England. Usually he will only get the points for the more serious offence, so 6-8 in total.

 

Renegade imp may be overly pessimistic IMO. While the offences are strict liability offences, the fact that he believed he was driving within the terms of his licence is good mitigation, and might even be enough to avoid the points. The court cam choose not to impose points if it finds special reasons not to endorse, and in England at least the High Court has considered that an honest and reasonable belief that you were licensed/insured can be a special reason not to endorse, especially if you were misled about your licence/insurance status by someone you had good reason to trust. That might apply. What did te friend he was giving a lift have to say about what he'd told him about his licence? Worth speaking to a specialist motoring solicitor IMO - they don't come cheap, but many will give a free initial consultation.

 

If he does end up with 6 points for no insurance he can continue to learn to drive - the New Drivers Act will not kick in unless he gets points for an offence committed after he gets his full licence. However it would mean that (1) any points at all in the first two years after he passes his test would mean going back to learner status and (2) as a newly qualified driver with an IN10 code on his licence he could expect eye-watering insurance premiums or a few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was only when they were stopped by the police the man told him that he surrendered his license under medical grounds a couple of years before.

 

Under which medical grounds ?

 

If your relative can prove the disabled man gave false notice at the time, and provide it in court, then he should have some mitigating circumstance.

 

What does the police record state when he was / they were cautioned ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ray & arent

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...