Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cash Convertors sold me stolen phone. Do i have any rights?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I brought my daughter a Blackberry phone for £79 from Cash Convertors in April using a debit card. Fast forward 31/2 months and i get a dawn raid from the old bill telling me the phone is reported stolen. Luckily i had the receipt so they didn't cart me off but they took the phone.

 

I rang Cash Convertors who put a droid on the phone telling me that the 60 day warranty was up but if i brought all paperwork in they would investigate the matter? When i asked there policy on refunding for goods that are found to be stolen she said she cannot discuss this with me??

 

The shop is quite a distance and i don't want to waste any more time if they are just going to flannel me and not refund my cash. They seem to be hiding behind a warranty that's over and to say they will investigate leads me to believe i will get the old letter saying sorry but tough luck.

 

So i want to pursue this further because it cannot be right that CC can sell stolen goods then wriggle out of any responsibility. When the police turned up i thought someone had died and then i was treated like a crook until i hunted down the receipt.

 

Any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

A warranty has nothing to do with a criminal offence like receiving stolen goods. As a business they have committed an offence as they a responsibility and should have checked the phone. I suggest you put it in writing to their head office requesting a full refund plus interest. Send a nice polite letter and then if no response within 14 days, come back on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If cash converters did check at the time, it may be that the phone wasn't reported stolen when they took it in.

 

It is even possible that it was taken in to Cash Converters by the owner, who subsequently reported it stolen.

 

Either way :

1) Cash converters should have records of who they bought it off, and should supply these to the police if the police haven't already asked for them

2) Warranty has nothing to do with it. Cash Converters should refund the OP and then CC can peruse it with whoever they bought the phone off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is illegal to sell something you do not have the right to. It is up to the seller to check.

 

You should write to them by recorded delivery telling them it is with the police and with a copy of your invoice and ask for a full refund.

 

How come the police came to you about this phone ?

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately selling a contract phone and then reporting it stolen is a very common con but the phone companies, ebay and others pretend it doesnt happen and feign shock when they are told otherwise.

Yes, you do have a claim against cash converters and I would give them a short time to refund you and then do a recharge via the card you paid with. The banks are supposed to refund you immediately and then investigate the claim but many will pretend they dont know the procedures so this is one case where the telephone customer services will be better than your local branch for knowledge and speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...