Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bike repairs - garage now unable to complete for 6+ weeks


konifer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3837 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My scooter died on me a couple of weeks ago. I took it in to my usual garage on 19th July. It took them a while to figure out what was wrong, but on 30th July they called to tell me that the engine had seized and would need a complete rebuild, quoted me £200-300 depending on what they could salvage and the time involved.I was told I'd need to decide whether to go ahead straight away as one of the two bike mechanics was already signed off work for six months with a torn ligament, and the other (the one I was speaking to) was going in for surgery on 6th August so would need to get to work straight away to complete it before he went off. I gave them the go ahead.I have just called (9th August) and spoke to the owner, apparently my bike is nowhere near ready and the mechanic's condition is worse than anticipated and he will be in a wheelchair for at least 6 weeks and so unable to work on it. They are basically saying there is no one else who can work on it, and with it being in pieces in their workshop I can't exaclty collect it and take it elsewhere.Any advice please? I am stuck taking the train to work at the moment, it is costing me a fortune and taking a very long time, and I can NOT carry on doing this for 6 weeks plus!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a "reasonable" time has passed, you can request that the bike is assembled and return to you. It is not your problem how this is done as they knowingly took the bike for repairs. What are they doing with other work? Tot up the cost of train fares as you may be able to claim part of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses.The mechanic who has gone off for surgery was the co-owner, the one who was already off is his son. I believe it is basically monetary considerations that are preventing them hiring someone in the interim. The garage does both bike and car work, they still have car mechanics in but no one who knows about bikes, apparently. I have made the point that an engine is still an engine and have even offered them my Haynes manual for reference!They have said they will try looking at it "this week" (wonderfully vague!). I will hound them and keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

4 stroke or 2 stroke scooter?

 

If a 2 stroke, you'll need a new piston and barrel, but it's an easy job to fit. Air cooled takes about 30 minutes, an hour or so for a water cooled engine. I've done one at the roadside with basic tools before now.

 

A standard cylinder and piston without head will run you between £60 and £100, more for an aluminium cylinder. You won't be able to salvage an alloy cylinder, it will need to be replaced.

 

The price quoted is reasonably high, unless they have to split the cases (in which case it's cheap) but I can't envisage any serious damage being done to the bottom end from a seizure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 stroke or 2 stroke scooter?

 


If a 2 stroke, you'll need a new piston and barrel, but it's an easy job to fit. Air cooled takes about 30 minutes, an hour or so for a water cooled engine. I've done one at the roadside with basic tools before now.


 


A standard cylinder and piston without head will run you between £60 and £100, more for an aluminium cylinder. You won't be able to salvage an alloy cylinder, it will need to be replaced.


 


The price quoted is reasonably high, unless they have to split the cases (in which case it's cheap) but I can't envisage any serious damage being done to the bottom end from a seizure.


 


I disagree, if there was a seizure it is paramount to check and 99% of the times change the conrod.
So the crankcase neexs to be opened, and once there, all gakets, o-rings, seals and bearing should be changed.
It's not essential, but for £20 or so it's worth doing.
If they are doing this, £200/300 is about right.
If they're only replacing cylinder and piston than £150 sounds about right and can be done in half hour or so.
Not replacing the conrod is too much of a risk; even an invisible deformation can seize the engine again.
Going back to the op, I would collect the bike (even if dismantled) and take it somewhere else.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree, if there was a seizure it is paramount to check and 99% of the times change the conrod.

So the crankcase neexs to be opened, and once there, all gakets, o-rings, seals and bearing should be changed.

It's not essential, but for £20 or so it's worth doing.

If they are doing this, £200/300 is about right.

If they're only replacing cylinder and piston than £150 sounds about right and can be done in half hour or so.

Not replacing the conrod is too much of a risk; even an invisible deformation can seize the engine again.

Going back to the op, I would collect the bike (even if dismantled) and take it somewhere else.

 

You're not going to get that kind of hard, locking seizure on a small 2 stroke engine. 99% of the time when 'seizure' is quoted, the piston has nipped a bit in the bore, deformed a piston or (more likely) damaged the bore to the point where compression is lost. With a CVT transmission, there's no counteracting force from the transmission engaged.

 

Agreed that you'd probably want to check the conrod hasn't deformed on a seized crosser or similar geared vehicle, but scooter cranks are over-engineered by comparison to the fragile top ends.

 

If caused by oil starvation however, it's probably a good idea idea to inspect the crankcase bearings and seals to check for wear. A flush of the block is worthwhile if the damage to the top end is worse than scoring to clear any swarf.

 

Source: I've repaired hundreds of the bloody things and used to run a tuned / nitrous italjet 180 as a second fun bike (blew a couple of piston crowns inside out on that one!).

 

Agreed that the OP should pick the thing up in bits if transport can be arranged. Put the block back in the bike on the pivot, chuck any loose bits in the helmet bucket and clear a Sunday to fix it.

 

It's not rocket science, a Haynes manual is about £15 (or free info online) and as the fault is purely mechanical, should be easy enough to fix. You'll need basic hand tools (sockets, combi spanners, circlip pliers, vernier calipers etc), a few bits (top end kit, gaskets, crankcase sealant (hylomar)), a lot of patience and a big mug of tea...

 

Once you've done it once, you'll realise how much of a rip off scooter repairs are...

Edited by 1hogan05
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...