Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Computeach and Barclays CDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3925 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

I've received a demand from Barclays for £5,197.70 for a CDL taken out for a course by Computeach in 2006.

 

I actually asked the tutor/salesman "what would happen if I paid for this course by CDL and didn't complete it,

that'd be an awful big debt for nothing?"

They replied

"well, because the loan is from European funding it would just go back from whence it came and you can go about your business

- but you will complete the course, won't you?" **chuckle**.

 

Satisfied with this answer and eager to begin I filled out all the paperwork and sat back contemplating a rewarding future.

 

I was okayed by Barclays and I enrolled for the MCSD course which comprised of

the IC3, Comptia A+ and the MCSD in Visual C# = Total cost £4995 or near on.

I gained the IC3 quite easily, and began the Comptia and C# pack.

 

Then in 2008 it became very difficult to complete it or even have access to a computer

due to spending several months homeless and ending up in sheltered accommodation.

 

I explained this to Computeach and they were at the time quite happy to put the study on hold

and give me time for circumstances to improve. However, they didn't and

 

after 6 months I received a letter saying a must pay £500 for an extension otherwise

"my student file would be discarded" (I think that was almost the exact wording).

The course closed as I didn't have the £500 at hand.

Everything seemed fine and dandy.

 

I had a CDL with Barclays which, handily, is the bank I have an account with anyway.

And it seemed as though what the tutor/salesman had said was true

- the money had happily been passed back to Europe for someone else to use

since I didn't need it, no cost to me :) No demands, no nothing, for years.

 

Now 2012 - bang!

 

Every week or two a demand from Barclays.

I largely ignored them, seeing them as a computer or administrative error.

 

Yesterday I rang their number just to clarify that the course was cancelled.

 

After an initially happy conversation with a Barclays advisor on the phone;

and after saying that since circumstances have changed

(I live in rented accommodation as a single father with a 21 month old son who is on Income Support)

I could not afford not even a £5 token payment, or any payment at all to this debt I do not feel I owe

- they are going to apparently going to pass on my details to the DCA who will be making far less happy conversations.

 

Anyone have any advice?

Personally, given the option of paying maybe £10 a month to a DCA to pay a £5000 loan is going to take me years

(since I know saying I was in my view misold a course but have no way of proving it,

which is not going to get me far in a court of law or in terms of a refund from

Computeach for a course that finished 4 years ago to all intents)

 

I was considering just tearing each letter up in future and just allowing them to make me bankrupt.

 

At the end of the day I can only volunteer as a Red Cross First Aider for the foreseeable future;

it is just me and my son in a one bedroom flat as that is all the council deem to view as necessary for us both;

I've got very few material items apart from my childs which the court bailiffs cannot touch.

 

Really, what have I got to lose apart from the ability to gain credit for 6 years?

 

Am I being naïve on this issue though?

 

Any thoughts welcome.

Edited by Obi1Kanoobie
Link to post
Share on other sites

might be an idea to see what your cra file says

about this 'debt'

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so Barclay still own it good

 

what is the default date in the summary please?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so jan 2015 before it vanishes then.

 

seems a bit strange if you only tok out £5k its still at £5k.

 

have you been getting statements since birth

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no that's great.

 

and you've been paying this since 2006?

 

how much have you paid so far

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, the terms of the Career Development Loan are that it didn't have to be paid back for three years and that there was interest free for that period. Sorry if I didn't mention that. Don't know if all CDL's work the same or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so when 'should' you have begun to pay this.

 

if the course was 'cancelled' you still had 'something' to pay for I assume

 

so 3yrs would sort of workout right for the dates of the default?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

one last thing

 

is this Barclays partner finance

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

something def not right here with what you owe that's for sure

 

can I suggest to further your quest!!

 

you type in

computeach

 

in the search of our grey toolbar up top [on the right of it]

 

there are numerous threads here involving this lot

 

and it might give you a better insight upon how to proceed

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is vague but to be honest I haven't ever had any real dealings with loans or credit cards.

 

There is only 2 times I've ever taken out credit in my life and they've both been for distance learning and I've regretted both decisions.

 

Otherwise if I don't have the money I live without.

 

Distance learning courses seem so attractive to me with little to no skills at that time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no not an issue at all.

 

i'm hoping that by having a read at other peoples dealing with them

 

it will give you overall a better picture

 

that we can apply to your situation.

 

reading how others have tackled these people

 

and there are lots of them

 

will help you understand it all.

 

i'm MY eyes there is something not right here with the money owed

 

and

 

i'm wondering if their 'claim' on you

might not be all they think it is worth or even collectable.

 

I've not really dealt that much with distance learning stuff.

 

but there are many that have

and those threads will open your eyes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info DX.

 

I had a feeling Computeach and other such companies operated in a purely money making sense.

 

But at the moment I'm not overly concerned about how to deal with them,

 

I'm more expecting how to deal with any court action.

 

In my case it may be doing me a favour I guess; no car; everything rented; spend more on a child than myself; on Income Support; working voluntarily.

 

The upset could be if I switched from unpaid to paid or NHS Ambulance Support Crew.

 

If I actually got taken to court tomorrow I'd only have to wait a year before I could do paid fulltime work if what I hear about bankruptcy is correct.

 

But I could be wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll have a guess they will sell the debt.

 

I wouldn't be too worried about court

 

that is a VERY long way off

 

if you want to scan up the letter you have

please do.

 

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

*********************************************************

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

try www.pdfescape.com TO BLANK STUFF,

*************************************************************

or

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

 

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...