Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

kwik fit refusing a service they supply


johnvarney
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently went to get a new tyre fitted at quick fit in penicuik, Edinburgh as i noticed i had a small bulge on the tyre that was on. They replaced the tyre and off i drove.

 

once i got back to my own area (Livingston) i spun out at a roundabout which resulted in me hitting a kerb, i wa sscared to move my car as i didnt know what damage had been caused so i contacted the police and they sent out a traffic car whom confirmed it would be ok for me to drive home. a few days later i noticed my steering didnt feel the same so i booked it into my local quick fit centre in livingston to have the alignment checked. They conformed my alignment was out a little and sorted it.

 

when i drove away i noticed it still didnt feel the same so i took it back, upon inspection the person the the livingston branch realised that the tyre that had been replaced by the penicuik branch was the WRONG size of tyre! i asked them if this could have caused me to spin out at the roundabout and they confrimed it could have as also did the police when i re-contacted them. so anyways they changed the tyre free of charge to a lower budget tyre as they didnt have the same tyre the other kwik fit changed it to (no price difference refunded) and done the allignment again which i had to pay for again!

 

iv hit a coupe of potholes since then and have took it back to have it realigned and again have paid for it, i realiased that under their guarantee they have a 30 day warranty which no one told me about and have made me pay every single time even when it has been within the 30 day period!

 

so with the car still not feeling right i took it to a whole new centre in edinburgh at the saughton branch who REFUSED to do my allignment altogether! not because they were busy or because of any other reason, he just point blank refused! this happened today and also the person was very arrogant and unhelpful, even when i asked him why he refused to do the car he replied " my worker is just refusing to do it for you".

 

seems to me that because it was a free service he was having to perform he didnt want to do it!

 

over the years i have always used quick fit and never had a problem and not listened to anyone else and now i am drastically changing my mind!

 

so in essence i have.........

 

1. lost control of my car due to the wrong tyre size being fitted

 

2. paid for an allignment to be done because of this

 

3. repaid for another alignment to be done when the correct tyre size was put on

 

4. paid for all subsequent alignments to be done when its been within my 30 day period

 

5. been refused to have my alignment done again although there is no reasonable explination!

 

6. got a cheaper tyre than the one i paid for and not had any money refunded

 

so yea its cost me time and money in petrol and alignments that should not even be needing done for very SIMPLE services that i have required!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

We're sorry to hear about your recent experience at Kwik Fit. We'd like to help, could you please e-mail customer DOT service AT kwik-fit DOT com with your vehicle registration number and we will look into this for you.

 

Kind regards,

 

Kwik Fit Customer Services

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

Thank you for providing your details. We will get this logged and an area manager will be in touch with you. Please be aware that it can take up to 3 business days for an area manager to get in touch with you regarding this.

 

Kind regards,

Kwik Fit Customer Services

[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

Thank you for providing your details. We will get this logged and an area manager will be in touch with you. Please be aware that it can take up to 3 business days for an area manager to get in touch with you regarding this.

 

Kind regards,

Kwik Fit Customer Services

[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello John.

 

I've removed your reg numbers because giving out this much information on a public forum tells too much about you.

 

I hope you manage to make contact with Kwikfit, please keep us posted as to how you're getting on.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i hit the potholes but when i took it back to have the alignment done hitting them didnt even effect it, so it means i paid for an alignment that didnt need aligned that should have still fallen under my 30 days! hich i think makes it even worse?

 

and i apologise for posting my information and thankyou for looking out for my safety.

 

john

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i received a phone call from kwik-fit today and that have agreed to bring the car in on friday to have the allignment checked. Whoever dealt with the complaint has impressed me, they have been very efficient, understanding and somewhat "descent" only thing im not happy about is the lack of "compensation" still wouldnt have this problem if my correct tyre size was fitted first time around. Funny enough i like "new tyres" maybe they should match my passenger side with the same tyre they changed for free? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...