Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
    • Personally I would strongly suggest not risking going there with debts. Very possible you wont get back out again. And I know many in that position. Not jailed just unable to leave. the stories of Interpol in other countries sounds far fetched but in and out of Dubai is not a good idea. only two weeks ago a mate got stopped albeit a govt debt.
    • BTW the time in and out is less than 10 mins, more than 5 in case that's relevant? I saw an article posted on here about a year ago a proposed legislation change but i don't know if that went through or not? I'm also a blue badge holder but there it was a regular parking spot.   Private parking fines to be capped at £50 WWW.BBC.CO.UK Drivers will also need to be given a grace period for lateness, as part of a crackdown on parking firms.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bank error in your favour


jet_force_juno
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

am in the process of claiming just over £2500 from Lloyds for unfair charges. Am waiting until the 1 November to file my money claim so as to include charges for this month. But that aint why I am writing...

 

I took out a Cash Loan with Lloyds in July 2005 for £2500. I DID NOT request Loan Protection Insurance...

Recently I realised that, low and behold, I had been paying LPI! I requested a copy of my original signed loan documents and what do you know, the section whch asks the customer to tick the box for LPI - AINT FRIKKIN TICKED!

 

SO here's how it breaks down. Over 60 months at 17.9%...

 

£2500 borrowed x 60 months at 17.9% = £3697.20 to repay PLUS

LPI on Loan over 60 months = £657.06 x 17.9% = £972 to repay

 

Total amount of loan £4669.20...

 

So I write and complain that I want the LPI cancelled straight away and the amount of LPI I have paid refunded to my current account.

 

The bank responded earlier offering me a refund of £4669.20 plus ex gratia interest... they have asked me to sign a decleration accepting the amount They have quoted this amount twice in the body of the main letter and once on the decleration which I have to sign, date and return.

Now the bank have made a clear error. They should have credited the LPI to my loan account (the 6£57.06), but instead have offered to credit the WHOLE amount owed.

As the loan has been running for 14 months already I have already paid over £1000 off. If the loan was settled now the amount repayable would be £2433.64. My branch told me that if the £4669.20 is credited to my loan account it will pay off the £2433.64 and the remainder: £2235.56 will show up in my current acount.

When I contacted the actual complaints people to query it, they said the offer of 4669.20 was "human error" and hasitly offered to pay the £657.06 (for my LPI) into my current account instead as well as cancelling the LPI...

 

My question is this. Clearly being a man of NO sympathy for the crooks at Lloyds (I will take these b******** for every penny. I never had any sympathy from them apart from whacking £35 charges for apply for my "human errors").

Is this letter legally binding? i.e. will Lloyds have to honour this offer once I accept it?

 

Cheers

 

jet

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is possible that due to their error and mis selling of PPI that the Agreement is unenforceable...(Null & Void)

 

The FSA and OFT have just Yesterday issued reports and findings on PPI policies and it makes interesting reading..The banks are going to get hit hard I recon..

 

Ive got one ongoing at the moment for mis selling of PPI and cant say too much about it at this stage with the legal side thats going on.. The national press are interested in the case I have ongoing and am meeting with them next week.. The Daily Record are doing a story on the mis selling and real costs of these policies. Maybe though the one Im fighting will not like the press involved..so cant say much more till after further discussions at start of next week.

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i read that to. Lloyds are going to cancel my LPI, but my question is once something is offered by the bank is it legally binding? They have offered me the same figure three times, it aint even like it is a mis-print...

 

I personally would accept it ..Call it compensation for their bad practise..:rolleyes::D

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they have not corrected it. I have told them not to send me any further offers until I have considered fully the offer they have already sent me.

 

They have told me that if I accept the offer of the 4669.20 they will refer the case to the Ombudsman. Lloyds being the d**** they are told me to phone the Ombudsman direct for advice...

 

Of course the Ombudsman does not offer advice to the general public.

 

My feeling is to write back to Lloyds accepting the offer and just see what happens from there...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the hell did you tell them they made a mistake????

 

If it were me i would have the £4600 in the bank now and said nowt after what they get up to.

Data Protection Act Request sent 22nd April 2006 (recorded delivery) to Penny Berryman 40 days up on 1st June 2006.

 

Statements recieved 5th May 2006

Claiming back = £3913.65

 

Preliminary Letter Sent 5th May (recorded delivery) to Customer Care, Birmingham. Told me to sod off on the 9th May

 

Letter Before Action Sent 9th May (recorded delivery) to Customer Care, Birmingham. Told me to sod off on the 12th May

 

Moneyclaim filed issued 6th June (14 days to reply) Time up on 20th June.

 

Acknowledged 15th June (28 days to defence)

Time up on 13th July.

 

Defence Recieved 7th July

 

Going Before the Judge 15th September

 

Court Date 5th December

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to them accepting their offering in full and final settlement of your complaint. If they realise at a later date they made a mistake you can plead ignorance! Put the additional monies in a high interest savings account just in case but if it did come to light they made a mistake I wouldn't give in and give it back because they wouldn't have a leg to stand on! Keep us informed how things go (also do a bit of research on how they stand legally with regards to the recovery of money as I am sure they can't recover money that they paid out in error where the customer would not be expected to realise they have been overpaid)...... this is where you plead ignorance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the hell did you tell them they made a mistake????

 

If it were me i would have the £4600 in the bank now and said nowt after what they get up to.

 

ummm, i didn't... I phoned up to query another point in the letter and that's when they realised. The lady who wrote the letter told me that the bank would have picked up the mistake anyway before the refund was applied.

 

I received no correspondence from Lloyds this morning about this matter, so I assume they will not be sending me out any letters retracting the offer or making a different offer. IF they were going to do that they would have done so hastily and I expect I would have had something this morning.

It is all academic now anyway. I have been back in to my branch who have confirmed that the letter will be legally binding.

As such I posted back the acceptance form with a covering letter via special delivery first thing this morning.

 

I still feel that the bank will not play ball but we will see. I will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed for you mate, it will be tremendous if you get it all.

 

It will certainly stick one up them ;)

Data Protection Act Request sent 22nd April 2006 (recorded delivery) to Penny Berryman 40 days up on 1st June 2006.

 

Statements recieved 5th May 2006

Claiming back = £3913.65

 

Preliminary Letter Sent 5th May (recorded delivery) to Customer Care, Birmingham. Told me to sod off on the 9th May

 

Letter Before Action Sent 9th May (recorded delivery) to Customer Care, Birmingham. Told me to sod off on the 12th May

 

Moneyclaim filed issued 6th June (14 days to reply) Time up on 20th June.

 

Acknowledged 15th June (28 days to defence)

Time up on 13th July.

 

Defence Recieved 7th July

 

Going Before the Judge 15th September

 

Court Date 5th December

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...