Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mis-sold Vodafone Contract


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In October 2012, I took out a contract with Vodafone which was a rolling, 30-day affair. I was assured 4 times verbally before the sale by the same sales agent that I would have 3 months of unlimited internet for free. Once the contract was printed and the agent noticed that this unlimited internet had not been written down, but again assured me verbally that it definitely would be included.

 

Needless to say, it wasn't included. I only took this contract because of the free internet because there were other deals on the market that would have been better value otherwise.

 

After 2 pay periods, I contacted the manager at the store where I purchased the contract and informed him of this, and the date at which I wanted the contract to end. He offered me a rebate on my next bill which would take the final bill to (in his words) "£7 or £8". The next bill came through for over £30, as Vodafone had added an extra month's bill on top without my consent and for no reason.

 

It was this stage that I found out the contract had been mis-sold, as I was not aware of the misselling of phone contracts before then. I phoned Vodafone customer services and informed them that I believed the contract had been missold. The agent agreed with me and agreed to wipe the amount of the final bill and we finished the call amicably.

 

Just after this, I went overseas for 3 months. Upon my return, I found that Vodafone was still pushing for the final bill and had referred the "debt" to a debt collection agency. The current bill total is now over £180 and it is having a strong negative effect on my credit rating.

 

I need to know what to do here. I know I am legally and ethically in the right, but don't know how to move forwards with this. I was prepared to walk away and let things be, but I am now determined to right royally screw Vodafone over if possible. Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG. Sorry your post was muissed.

 

I think you may have problems here as what is said verbally cannot be proved unless the manager agrees with your statement. (highly unlikely)

 

It happens that we have a VF rep here who is known for helping. Lee

 

If you follow the instructions FULLY here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?213340-Vodafone-Webteam-for-Customers-With-Problems-**UPDATED-November-2012**&p=3683706&viewfull=1#post3683706

 

making sure you post the automated response number up on this thread, Lee should be able to reconcile the email you send to this thread.

 

Hopefully he will be able to help you.

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

subbing with great interest as I too was missold a contract , and Lee is going to get back to me. I was Forced into signing a contract i did not want as all I wanted was a phone repair or replacement but was told by the salesperson not possible as if i did not get the new 27 month contract (was previously on 12 monther) then I would be phoneless and wouldn't even let me get a PAYG . Ironically a mate of mine had problems with the same store and had to instigate CC proceedings to refund her money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi wnick88,

 

Thanks for making me aware of this and for following the advice provided by silverfox.

 

Just to let you know that I've received your most recent email and will get back to you as soon as possible.

 

subbing with great interest as I too was missold a contract , and Lee is going to get back to me. I was Forced into signing a contract i did not want as all I wanted was a phone repair or replacement but was told by the salesperson not possible as if i did not get the new 27 month contract (was previously on 12 monther) then I would be phoneless and wouldn't even let me get a PAYG . Ironically a mate of mine had problems with the same store and had to instigate CC proceedings to refund her money.

 

Hi toofiegap,

 

Thanks for your time on the phone during the weekend.

 

As promised, I'll get back to you again as soon as I have an update.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...