Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Whatever the nuances of the law, they will be lost on OPS, who like the rest of the PPcs never bother to get planning permission, ever. When they get a new contract they don't want to delay issuing PCNs by deigning to follow the law, especially as the period when they take over and the parking restrictions are new is the time when they can catch most drivers out.
    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black Horse


stu997
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Following an extremely messy seperation and subsequent divorce from my wife nearly 3 years ago,

something has come to light whilst going through the financial settlement.

 

This is also extremely messy as she is totally unreasonable with everything.

 

I took on the marital debt when I seperated, which stands in the region of 24k.

 

One of these debts is loan off Black Horse which is in joint names.

It was taken out as a deposit for a conservatory.

 

As with all the other debts I am dealing with, my ex-wife is denying all knowledge.

 

Unknown to me at the time, she had contacted Black Horse after we had separated,

and told them I had forged her signature on the application.

This only came to light when I saw it in her financial statement.

( I will say at this stage, my ex-wife is not the brightest and she will blatantly lie about anything in order to achieve financial gain.

How she can lie through her back teeth as she does is beyond me!!!).

 

Once all this came to light, I contacted Black Horse and asked about the fraud investigation.

They informed me that the fraud investigator had been unable to prove fraud and the case was closed.

I asked for a letter confirming this outcome.

 

The letter I received did not say anything about the fraud investigation,

just that they wished to confirm my ex-wife had been removed from the account.

I rang them back and eventually got the letter confirming the result of the investigation.

Interestingly there were no signatures at all on the original loan application.

 

I then turned to the fact of my ex-wife being removed from the account.

My solicitor wrote to Black Horse asking them for the reasons behind my ex-wifes removal from the loan.

( I had given them written permission for my solicitor to have full disclosure as she was acting on my behalf)

 

Black Horse wrote back to her stating it was a "Business Decision" and they would not provide any details under Data Protection.

I then wrote to Black Horse, requesting all the details as being the joint account holder,

my ex-wife was not afforded the luxury of the Data Protection Act. I heard nothing.

 

2 days ago I phoned them to see what was going on.

 

It was apparent they were squirming and nobody could give me any answers

as to why my ex-wife was removed from this joint loan,

with no authorisation,

agreement or even consultation with myself.

 

They informed me they had escalated the complaint and a senior complaints manager would contact me.

 

Yesterday I had that phone call, and the attitude had completely changed.

The manager was very abrupt and told me it was a business decision

and under data protection they would not tell me why they had done this.

He asked if I was going to make a complaint to which I replied I already had.

He just said fine, I will send you the final outcome letter and hung up.

 

So what I am asking....

1, Are Black Horse able to remove my ex-wifes name from a joint loan,

without any consultation or agreement by myself, being the other joint name?

2, As a joint name on the loan, is my ex-wife still protected by Data Protection?

3, Do Black Horse have to provide me with the reasons behind their decision?

4, Have Black Horse been unlawful in anyway with their actions.

5, What should I now be doing about it?

 

I have been in touch with the financial ombudsman in regard to this.

The case is in its early stage so it will take some time for them to investigate and reach an outcome.

 

Do I have grounds to take legal action against Black Horse for what they have done, or is it a totally legitimate action?

 

This joint account is the only one that linked my wife to the £24k of marital debt.

 

As she has denied all knowledge and taken the actions she has which resulted in Black Horse dong this,

it am effectively in the situation where these debts will probably not be taken into account at the Financial Settlement,

leaving me £24k worse off!

 

Thanks very much Black Horse!!!

 

Yur help and advice woill be greatly appreciated.

 

Many Thanks in Advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I cart answer the question but I would of thourght they would have to let you now that is what is happening I think you have done what you can at this point have you got ant charges on the loan that you my be able to claim back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple answer is ...no they cant remove her from the joint loan...unless there is a Transfer of Equity processed but you would have been involved for that to happen........your Solicitor which handled your divorce should deal with this matter.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Andy.

I have spoke to my solicitor in regards to this. She put me in touch with a solicitor that deals with this type of thing.

With my fees already running at nearly £10k I simply cannot afford to use her services at present. If I establish that I have an excellent chance of taking successful legal action against them then I could pass them costs over. This is why I am trying to get opinions before I take that step.

i have complained to the financial ombudsman so will see what they have to say as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...