Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M and S letter about PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

MY mum has received a letter about PPI from M and S explaining that she had it on a loan from them and asking her to fill in a questionnaire.

 

She thought that she did not have PPI on the loan and that is why she never did anything about it, she would not have knowingly taken it out at the time.

 

What is the best way to fill in the questionnaire?

 

alot of the questions she can not remember the answer to.

 

Is this the best way to go about reclaiming? will they be honest?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, compare the questionnaire to the one on the fos website to ensure that the questions being asked are the same.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

If not, use the one from the fos site.

 

Has your mum got the loan agreement and a record of all the payments made?

 

It is best of you work out what you should receive back and to do this you will need the agreement and a record of the payments made.

 

While they might be honest, the general rule is "Don't Trust Them" so make sure you know what you are due.

 

In completing the questionnaire you can only answer what you know. That does not exclude you from making a claim.

 

If you prepare a spreadsheet showing how much you are owed you can send it to the lender with the completed questionnaire. They will have 8 weeks to investigate and give you a final decision.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you for the reply

 

The questionnaire is very different from the one you have linked to.

 

We have not yet been able to find the loan details, would a SAR get these details?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi everyone,

 

My mum has received the data from the SAR she was adamant that she had not taken any ppi out and if she did she would have cancelled it after one month when she discovered it.

However the details show that she had signed for the ppi.

 

where does this leave us? at the time the loan was taken out she was a company director of her own company and would have continued to be paid even if she was sick/ill, she says that she was not salaried but made drawings every month with the other director.

 

Is it possible to reclaim this ppi? it runs into many thousands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes of course

 

put those exact reasons in the fos cq

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...