Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • click the link. dx  
    • There are two things to immediately clarify. Firstly, why did court papers go to the wrong address?  In 99% of backdoor CCJ cases here the person moves and doesn't update the vehicle log book address.  Or they move and they don't inform the parties who they are in legal dispute with of the new address.  Does either of these apply to you? Secondly, given this has been going on for over three years without presumably any ill effects on you, how important is it for you to have a clean credit file?  I ask as, if you do absolutely nothing, the CCJ will disappear in April 2027.
    • Sorry to ask, but I know I had SB template on PC, but can't find it. Also any search for template\SB letter takes me back here.  Any help to get to SB letter would be appreciated. I know I used it on a car HP co that wouldn't honor my FCS refund and after 6 years came threatening ( or rather their DCA). Worked a treat. Thanks in advance
    • Received this letter today after all this time !! Doesn’t sound like just a threat any advice please  Thanks  Photo.pdf
    • Good evening. Hoping to keep this short and concise. Any help really appreciated! Sent originated from council tax in 2019.  I moved address for a new career 240miles away in December 2019 and have lived here ever since.  A distant friend resides at previous address.  A CCJ was filed regarding this debt in January 2020 but no correspondence was received my end or at the old address.  Move forward to this year; early April I learn of a letter received from Bailiff - Notice of Enforcement dated 13/03. Stated I had ten days to settle a payment/payment plan or £75 will be added after ten days from 13/03 and bailiff instructed to visit.  Obviously I was unaware of this letter till well after the time period passed. Attempted to contact Dukes via email but zero response. Asked for breathing space in order to check the original debt with the respective council (I wasn’t awarded a week of Housing despite being on UC for a short period due to a contract date given by the old employer).  29/04 a note was left at the old address stating a bailiff had visited. New balance £310 more than original outstanding.  I’ve since contacted both the council and the bailiff agent to state I’m more than happy to settle the original debt over a payment plan but at this stage they will not remove the fees despite all correspondence not being sent to me and obviously me only seeing them much later than one would have expected.  Tried live chat today with the company and firstly was told the fees will remain because I spoke to the enforcement agent - I have never spoken to him/her.  secondly told the fees would remain because “I tried to use their web chat service to complete an income form” - I have zero recollection of doing this and I also wonder if it’s another tactic? any help on where I stand with the fees added would be incredible. Thank you
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Problem with Will/Trustee - ** judge found in our favour **


hyperjase
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3694 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I understand - may be it is better to err on the side of caution on this. The chances of actually recovering the next £5000 + interest may be in jeopardy but safer than incurring costs which we cannot afford.

 

I'll re-do the paperwork with just her name and send a letter to the Chancery Judge to forewarn another case will be brought against the Defendant for the same reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, a further update to the original post.

 

The deadline for the whole payment to be at the Court was 19th March @ 4.00pm.

 

Today I received a letter with a cheque for £254.80 and a notification they had sent post dated cheques which had to be returned as the court rejected those, and even then, it only made up £750 worth of liability. So they're in some serious doo-doo. The case has been passed back to the Chancery District Judge and I'm hoping they'll take direct action and proceed with prosecution. For the amount they'll owe on both Trustee cases, it'll be around £13,000 in total, I'm hoping that'll make some form of local news, to shame them. I know it sounds harsh but for what they've done ... is unfair and dishonest and no defence could be made for what they did.

 

So the saga continues. If they don't take further action to recover the amount I'll go for an Attachment of Earnings order, best chance of recovering the entire amount, albeit in small chunks. I don't think there's much point sending Court Appointed Bailiffs in as they can only enforce up to £5000, which is a shame.

 

I'll keep you posted with what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the Chancery District Judge could initiate prosecution. Presumably at most he could inform the CPS or police.

 

If you wanted to take bailiff action you would give the case to HCEOs who can enforce for a higher amount. Whether they'd be able to find £13,000 of assets though is another question.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This is carrying on from my previous case, this time it's my second Step Son, who was left £5000 in the Will.

 

I've prepared the paperwork much the same as the first case but as soon as she got the paperwork she admitted to owing it, but has supplied nothing in the way of where the money is or how much interest is owed, so I haven't been able to put this down on paperwork. I've attached a PDF of a letter which arrived today - looks like they made the judgement regardless of my argument? Not overly happy with that, I know I can object to this, but what shall I do? Shall I object claiming she hasn't provided documentary evidence of where the money is? How much interest it should have accrued? Also -- should I request the interest rate be set at 8% as she hasn't sent and documentation as to how much there should have been if it had still been in Trust.

 

Any advice gratefully received as I'm now concerned she'll just end up having to pay £250 a month (which is OK as long as it includes 8% interest).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £5000 seems to cover interest up until the date of judgment. Is this correct?

 

In theory you could object and try to push this to a hearing but I'm not sure there is a great deal this would achieve. I think you might struggle to get documentary evidence of where the money is. My best guess is that the money has been frittered away over time on general living expenses.

 

Did you ever start receiving payments for the first case?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £5000 was the amount left in trust, the £5000 does not have any interest included (my previous case was successful and the judge awarded 8% interest which added a further £1800 making the total judgement £6800).

 

Can I now request the interest on this? I have no date to go from as they have provided no evidence (she had to supply it for the previous case and I have a date the monies were invested, but this being a separate case I'm not using any of the information from that case)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever start receiving payments for the first case?

 

Since the judgement, received two cheques for just over £500 ... nothing since and I believe it is with the Police for investigation as to whether it can be classed as a criminal act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judgment is inclusive of interest up to 24 April 2014. Presumably this is because it was the amount claimed. If you are feeling bullish there might be a possibility of trying to go back and claim pre-judgment interest, but it would not be easy now that there is a judgment in play and I think would need a retrospective amendment to your claim.

 

Judgment debts of 5,000 and above automatically carry interest from the date of judgment (i.e. 24 April 2014). However, where the terms of a judgment specify payment by installments interest does not begin running on the amount of an installment until it falls due (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1991/1184/article/3/made)

 

Regarding the first claim, if the court order requires immediate payment then interest will be running at 8%. It sounds like she is trying to pay this off by installments but interest will run unless the installments are approved by court order.

 

Regarding the second claim, it sounds like there will be no interest unless and until an installment is late.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's looking unlikely I'll be able to claim the 8% interest, can I refer to the first case and show them the evidence in that case? As the outcome of that was more in depth. Don't really want her getting away with not having to pay out what should be due. Just seems like my argument wasn't sufficient enough.

 

I do have the contact details of the District Judge who awarded the first judgement, would it be worth contacting them to explain this situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legislation is quite clear that, if instalments are ordered, interest only runs if the instalments are late. I don't think you can get around that. The difference is (I assume - obviously I haven't seen the documents) that she was ordered to pay the full amount immediately in the first case but was granted instalments in the second case. Unfortunately I'm not sure there is much you can do about this.

 

Interest/loss of returns arising before the judgment date is in theory claimable but would be a bit more legally complicated. You would have had to indicate the dates on which you are claiming interest when completing the online form.

 

I don't think you would achieve much by trying to contact the DJ informally. You'd need to kick the process off with an application notice asking the court to do something, which would get the case allocated to the same court (its currently in Northampton) and you can then request that the case is put before the same judge.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I send an application notice off requesting the interest it would accrued be added to the amount from the date of investment would that get the ball rolling? I'm not sure how it's not quite gone down the same route this time, essentially she has spent/stolen/disposed the monies however, but it was left in trust and is a breach of the Trustee Act.

 

I'm happy to pursue further paperwork and my step son isn't working so any costs would be removed, I just don't want him to lose out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you claim for interest from the date of investment in the first instance, though? If no careful thought will be needed about how to approach this properly. One option might be formally amending your original claim. Not sure if you can do that once a judgment has been issued, would need to check.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because no evidence was supplied, I entered in "£5000 + interest" -- I made a point of noting this as many times as I could. Because it's a separate claim I couldn't take the date of investment from the first claim, therefore I left it as an unknown period of time and amount accrued. I've prepared an Application Notice requesting the evidence of the bank book to show when it was invested to be able to calculate the interest accrued and owed. I have referenced the first case stating they had a judgement against them for the same situation. I may be clutching at straws here but the first application (for my first Step-Son) did make it to Court, I just want this one to head the same way. I'd like a similar outcome for both Step-Sons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...