Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Regal Credit after swinton car insurance


ford2872
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I hope somebody can direct me on a situation that as come about through a non fault accident details are as follows :-

 

bought a car got cheapest quote from Swinton and i had no problems with them for a good 6-7 months.

 

I was visiting family and my car was parked out front when a lorry hit it Thankfully no-one was hurt except my car

 

it looked like the only damage was front driver side colour coded bumper had been ripped down on side of impact causing it to snap away from fixing bracket and a crack in bumper.

 

The driver of the lorry was helpful and supplied me with the name of the company he worked for and the telephone number helped me cable tie bumper back up. The police were not called as he admitted that he was at fault.

 

When i drove car home ( about 8 miles) vehicle felt weird with steering

 

i phoned the haulage firm and spoke to the owner who was again helpful

and asked me to take car to body repair centre and get a quote to repair

or replace bumper and to either fax or email the quote to him and he would pay to have it repaired.

 

The following day I took it to a garage and explained to them what had happened

and i also mentioned that the car felt really unsafe with steering.

 

While I waited he had a look at the damage and underneath vehicle and informed me that the tie rod ends had snapped on both sides of the car ( front )

and also that the passenger side wheel had dent probably caused by impact to kerb.

 

He told me to contact my insurance company about accident so that I'd be able to get courtesy car

because he flt that car was really unsafe to drive.

 

He also said he'd phone a accident assesment specailist ( i think it was that )

 

I left there had taxi home and phoned swinton to inform them of the accident,

I give them the name and number of haulage firm and also the garage details of where i'd left car.

after about an hour they phoned me back and told me that i,d have a call from a hire company about courtesy car.

 

I had a call the following day and they wanted to know whereabouts of car and my requirements for courtesy car which i supplied

and i was informed that they would get a car to me the following day...

 

Stayed in all day waiting no car .

 

phoned them and was then informed that no vehicles available for 3 days.

 

What else could i do but agreed to wait but again no car arrived

 

2 weeks went by no courtesy car and also no follow up calls from swinton.

 

Then my car was returned to me unsafe to drive and a recomendation that it would cost more to repair than what the car was worth

So he was recommending it be writing off.

 

The garage owner informed me that he.d phoned swinton to inform them and to say car had been returned to me ready for them to arrange pick up to be taken and scrapped.

 

i told him i was not happy after being left with no car or calls from swinton.

And he told me he'd sort out a courtesy car.

 

An hour later i got call from a company who had been instructed by garage to supply me with courtesy car

and following day a brand spanking new puegot 507 was signed over to me

while i waited for payment from haulage firms insurance for my car.

 

They where claiming hire costs from haulage firms insurance company and where also instructing them to pay me out top book for my car.

 

my car was picked up by a recovery lorry to be taken to manchester and i waited for insurance to pay out

 

just over 6 weeks later from day of accident i was sent payment from insurance courtesy car went back and i bought new car.

 

phoned swinton and had heated disscussion on how unhelpfull they where and was told that the company they had arranged me to have courtesy car

had not informed them as all costs were being charged to the other parties insurance and apologiged.

 

I asked them to change the policy details to my new car which was now 1.8 rather than a 1.6 litre engine

and they informed me that it would cost me a addional £456 to insure new car.

OLD POLICY WAS £298 now THEY WANTED £754.

 

I told them that i wasnt prepared to pay that as i had had a cheaper quote online for nearly half the amount

they where asking and informed them i no longer needed a policy with their company.

 

A week later had a letter asking me to pay a final payment of £108.61 to cancel policy

I phoned them and told them i was not happy to pay this after the way they treated me after accident

and told them it was a third parties fault so why should i be penalised.

swansea swinton branch informed me that they would inform head office and get back to me.

 

NOW 4 months later i get a letter from REGAL CREDIT asking for £108.61 before they take legal action

 

Can anyone please advise me or help with a template letter.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can kill 90% of that waffle .....

 

regal credit are a DCA

they are not bailiffs and have NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regal are a nasty, shouty DCA. As DX says, they have no powers whatsoever and don't even consider speaking to them as they will just argue and get unpleasant, but cannot take legal action against you as they don't own the alleged debt and are merely hired to try and force you to pay up. Deal only with Swinton. Look through full details of their policy and find clauses and arguments as to why you should not be liable for any cancellation fees which you may have agreed to in the small print when you took out the policy. Is this actually a cancellation fee, or an amount for premiums paid in arrears but outstanding when cover was cancelled?

 

Go to the ombudsman if necessary.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...