Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

attempted Car repossesion by moneybarn **WON IN COURT**


tigeress289
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3992 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, new to the forum and having just read a fantastic post on a welcome loss, made super reading.

 

I used a different company and bought a car over 48 months.

 

After 36 payments, I lost my job but still managed to pay another 7 after that.

 

This left 5 and I was finding it hard.

 

I phoned the company and the rep was not interested in spreading payments.

 

I defaulted but managed to pay the next instalment, leaving 4 but still a month behind.

 

Charges were being put on but still no movement from them, they just wanted the money.

 

I then paid the next payment ,leaving 3.

 

Finally I reached an agreement with a senior rep and the last 3 payments would be, 367 instead of 322.

 

I put the money in the bank but they tried to draw 467 and the bank returned the request.

 

They served a termination notice and handed it over to another company.

 

3 months later I get a knock at the door and someone threatens to remove the car if I do not pay 1140.

 

I ask if he has a court order and he says, NO.

 

I told him I wish he had taken it as I could have claimed all the money back,

 

he laughed and said he nearly did but checked the notice and saw there was no court order.

 

He said he would have been liable had he had taken it.

 

My question is,

if the company apply for a court order to reposess.

 

Does the court have to notify me directly as I want to make an offer to pay the remaining 3 payments off over a period as now unemployed.

 

Or is there another way to resolve this, as I feel the company has broken an agreement

and given me no chance from the offset.

 

Thanks for any replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whose the company please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes ductons Car Finance 247

 

ok

 

have you all the statements from day one and the agreement to hand?

 

ever been hit with PENALTY charges?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They certainly would need to take you to court for possession as you have paid more than a third of the agreement.

 

If they do issue a claim the court will send you the papers with a form to defend.

 

If you are able to make payments towards the last bit you owe on the agreement then there is no way a judge would allow the vehicle to be repossessed.

 

Ensure you only pay the installment amount, not the charges.

 

When you have paid the total balance of the agreement they will argue you still owe money for their charges

- let them try and take you to court for that!

 

What they do is whenever you make a payment they take their charges off the balance first then the remainder goes towards your monthly payment,

that way they can keep you in arrears and so keep adding a monthly charge

- they are a nasty bunch to deal with.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx and Ell.

Up untill I became unemployed every thing was fine

 

as I had lost someone close in the first year

I bought the car and had funeral expenses,

 

phoned Duncton as they was then and spread a payment over the next 3 to help me out, with no problem.

 

This lot, different ball game.

 

I will check back every thing and see how much charges have gone on.

 

In the mean time I am going to offer a payment plan as I just want to clear the debt having invested so much into the car.

 

I am so glad to see the court has to notify me as the recovery guy

stated that they get an order without having to contact me and the car will just be removed.

 

I will let you know the responce I get.

all the best and thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get stung for any insurances on the agreement too?

 

fav trick of dunstons was to imply things

like gap/life/ppi were compulsory.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No,

I got stung by the dealer I bought it through,

 

he took a 2500 cash deposit + a 225 document fee.

 

Borrowed 9000 and interest was 6181.

 

Will recheck all payments as I paid quite a few fees early on when I changed payment dates and moved bank accounts.

 

There was a fee every time.

 

I can also see how they seem to take payments off the charges as you say and keep the arrears high.

 

I will get all my bank statements from day 1, as the fees are looking quite high.

 

Thanks for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like you need to sar moneybarn

 

get all the statements

 

i bet they owe you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hold on it and click

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you write to them asking for the charges to be refunded due to them being unfair, I bet they send you a letter stating their charges were assessed by the OFT and deemed to be fair - they even quote an OFT case number !

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had an interesting phone call which I find strange from the colections/recovery company. I offered 50 pound a week but turned down. The extra fees however, now exceed 600 pound.

 

stay off that phone!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just edit it in ms word

with your details

 

no need to type it all out

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just got the sar details back, which was quick.

 

What I am looking for as unfair charges?

 

I am going to send another offer to pay the arrears off in writing but would like to know if anyone has ever taken a finance company to court over the unfair charges?

 

I need to spend some money on the car for repairs as I have a buyer and already found another car.

 

Someone posted once 3/4 paid off the finance company are no longer owners. But have had no reply on that thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its theirs until the final payment.

 

look for reoccuring 'fees'

 

late/over/letter/debt management

 

if not scan them up

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Good news from the Court, the Judge said it was one of the worst cases they had heard and allowed me to to pay in installments. Without asking they did not allow Moneybarn any costs. What I must say is that the advice on this forum has been excellent but the downside to shown just how low Moneybarn have reached, is that they used these posts in their witness statement as it it were all facts.

 

So my advice in future is not to use company names and keep details as basic as you can to avoid these low lifes scanning consumer forums to try and get evidence against you. Thankfully the Judge ignored them and in a way worked against them.

 

A footnote is that a SAR has opened my eyes to just how much you can uncover. As Wolfie, would say, "Power to the People" A big thanks to all those that helped as you were all part of defeating a faceless money grabbing company. You really do have to wonder what type of person works for companies like them.

Edited by tigeress289
Link to post
Share on other sites

great well done

 

what happened about the PENALTY charges

 

anything happen?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news - well done. I trust the statement you took to court helped the judge come to the right decision :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was right in front of the Judge and I am sure they read it well before hand. Would love to have heard the solicitor phoning moneybarn afterwards. A very good day to say the least.

Edited by tigeress289
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was right in front of the Judge and I am sure they read it well before hand. Would love to have the solicitor phoning moneybarn afterwards. A very good day to say the least.

 

 

I love it when a plan comes together...........:wink:

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to attempted Car repossesion by moneybarn **WON IN COURT**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...