Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can be sure that pardoning himself, stopping the other prosecutions and vengeance will be his first priorities if he wins. i dont think he will win, but no surety on that
    • The other cases aren't going to happen before November though, are they? Reporters are saying he can't pardon himself for a state conviction. He would have to lean on the governor of New York state, as I understand it.
    • I am requesting your assistance to how I should go about a serious breach of my privacy that occurred during my stay at one of IHG’s hotel on Ma 2023. Having previously had items taken from my hotel room elsewhere I take the added precaution of using a security camera app on my device whenever I stay in a hotel room. The recordings are date and time stamped and it cannot be adjusted by the end user.   On this particular occasion I discovered evidence from my personal security camera recordings of a spy camera had been placed underneath my door, and can be seen moving along the base of the door for approximately 15 seconds.   The spy camera is in fact marketed as an inspection device of drains primarily but is known to be used in observing spaces difficult to enter. It is a usb endoscopic camera that has a length flexible cable that is semi rigid and can negotiate any obstruction by bending. The operator can be up to 3-4 metres away.   Infuriated as I had previously stayed with them in 2022 for 3 months at £260 per night that they would seek to question my honesty and invade my privacy. I immediately called reception and asked why they would do such a thing and if they had any concerns they were welcome to inspect my room and go through my personal belongings and ask me anything they wanted to. I was sleeping for the best part of my stay and was alone throughout.   I sent the recordings to the receptionist within the hour of finding them and I asked to speak to the manager of the hotel who I was told wasn’t present. I tried to have face to face meetings with him but he instead wrote to me denying the recordings were made at their hotel stating that they didn’t observe anyone in the corridor at the time of the recordings and that they don’t have a metal bar at the interface of the tile and carpet which corresponds to the overlying door. I rejected that statement on the grounds the video doesn’t show a bar but a reflection of light on the tile and you wouldn’t see a person outside my door because the cable is black and runs along the floor. If you don’t look for this you won’t see it. The matter was passed up to the area manager and he also denied the allegation. This is where the matter ends as far as IHG are concerned. Leading a busy work and family life I let the matter go but I found myself back at the same hotel a year later. I booked for  2 nights and was given a room facing the lobby door that led to the lifts. Unfortunately, from the hours of 3am I was woken up by the noise of the door opening and closing but also noticed shadows of a person standing in front of my door. At first I took no notice and put this down to a guest waiting for someone but the person or persons returned several times, standing outside my door for up to several minutes. I called the hotel reception and asked if there was an issue  on my floor and they said they would come up to check. They never said they would check the CCTV and as the incidents continued to happen up to 8am I called them 6 times. Given my past experience I didn’t think they took security as serious a# her establishments and made them observe the Cctv and let me know. The explanation I was given was that they could see residents there but they were heading down to breakfast. The time that I had noticed these feet by door was from 3am and breakfast started at 6.30am. It also didn’t explain why they would stand by my door for anything longer than 10seconds and if they were waiting for someone how likely is it that this scenario is played out 6 times when there was only 12 rooms per floor. Later that morning when I went down for breakfast the manager said he would move me to a room at the end of the corridor and asked me what my plans were for the day, essentially when would I be in the hotel. I stated that for the day I was out. He then said that all his staff were uncomfortable about me being a guest and said that I was not welcome there anymore. I had paid for the two nights but when it came to the end of the day I didn’t feel that I would be able to rest at the hotel given the hostility so I returned the next day to collect my remaining belongings, namely items of clothing, an iPhone charging cable and plug, and toiletries. Checkout was at 2pm and I was at the hotel at 3pm. All my belongings were gone and they couldn’t locate the items.  I plan to report the incident of the spy camera to the police, as well as the theft, and write to the hotel emphasising that this breach of privacy is unacceptable and the hotel's failure to properly investigate and address the issue is deeply concerning. The fact that I requested security checks to ensure my safety in the early hours was reasonable, yet their response to ban from the premises was excessive and even possibly discriminatory as I had revealed to them that I had been a victim of a hate crime given my sexuality. . I am seeking compensation for the infringement of my privacy, the lack of proper investigation, and the being humiliated and made to feel like an undesirable. I will request a full refund of my two-night stay totaling £390. Additionally, I will request compensation for the cost of my previous stay when the infringement occurred, which was £220. I am also considering damages for the infringement of my privacy but at a loss as to what this would equate to. I will close the letter giving them a 14 day timeframe to respond.    Is there anything you feel i need to consider here? Many thanks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

o2 and Default on credit file


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am writing this on behalf of a friend who I am trying to help out, sorry it's a bit wordy.

 

They had a pay monthly phone with o2 (online) and took out a new contract with o2 (store), around May 2010. After a month or two, they called up o2 to cancel the online account. They recall being advised no further payments would be due and proceeded to cancel their direct debit. Since then, they have heard nothing.

 

Fast forward to Christmas 2012, they decide to check their credit reference file and a default had been placed in November 2010 for £36. It seems the advice given by o2 was incorrect and he shouldn't have cancelled the DD.

 

He wrote to o2 to query this as he believed it to be an error. o2 confirmed he did owe the £36. He wrote to them again and stated that he doesn't believe the default was justified and it was unfair as they hadn't informed him it would be placed, nor that he owed them money. They stated in writing, that they would clear his credit reference file upon payment. So he called them up, made the payment but was told on the phone while making said payment, they wouldn't be removing the default after all. He wondered if he should make the payment but decided it was the right thing to do and wrote to them again, this time to the Complaints review team.

 

They have since written back and stated they won't remove it as they are legally required to give a true reflection of his payment history.

 

He had been a customer since 2003 and had no payment issues. He was not warned that any money was owed by phone, email or letter. Nor of their intention to place a default or that they had gone ahead and done so. He only became aware of the outstanding amount because he checked his file of his own accord. He has been given duff advice by o2 twice, first that no payments were due and second that they would be happy to clear the credit file after payment.

 

I have checked ICO guidance and it seems this behaviour could be considered unfair. For such a small amount it doesn't seem justifiable, especially as it was incurred at the exact time the contract and DD was cancelled and he was not given any opportunity to rectify the problem.

 

Where do I take it from here?

 

Thanks so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the problem here is going through so called customer service departments, generally speaking complaints sent to these never get seen by anyone able to make a decision.

 

So your friend should make a FORMAL COMPLAINT to O2, staing clearly all that has occurred and what they want done to remedy the matter.

 

A company has 56 days to answer the complaint and give them a final response.

 

Then this can be taken to the relevant regulators if the response is favourable.

 

The complaint should be addresssed to the Data Controller at O2 head office address.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats not very fair.

 

IMHGO i would SAR them

specifically asking for the comms log or call log

then see if there is record of being advised to cancel the DD.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brig, I think he followed the o2 Complaints procedure thinking that was the right way to go but I'll advise him to do this instead.

 

Thanks dx100uk, I will ask him to do so. I hope his memory is correct as it is such a shame to have a default for such a small amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Google the ICO Technical Guidance on Defaults.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So a complaint was brought to the Ombudsman, who got back to him last week.

 

They are siding with o2 because o2 produced evidence that letters were sent out, even though none were received.

 

Does anyone know what I can do next?

 

It seems in a he said/she said situation, the Ombudsman gives the company the benefit of the doubt not the customer.

 

Is there anything I can be quoting or referring them to?

 

I can't think of any more evidence to provide plus it was so long ago, I doubt any exists.

 

Any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They stated in writing, that they would clear his credit reference file upon payment.

 

Does he still have this letter in which they say they will remove default on payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he still have this letter in which they say they will remove default on payment.

 

Yes, both o2 and the Ombudsman have had sight of and hold copies of this letter, though o2 said he shouldn't have been told this, essentially they made a mistake and the Ombudsman doesn't think it is of any importance.

 

To be honest I got the impression the Ombudsman had decided in favour of o2 before they had even read the complaint fully.

Edited by Jessica87
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask FOS to get a more senior adjudicator to review the decision, which about as far as you can go at present.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brig, this was the Ombudsman Services rather than FOS but I'll ask if something similar is available.

 

Would the letter from o2 stating they'd clear the credit file stand up in court if it came to that?

 

There is no dispute that the debt was owed (and is now paid) but it just seems unfair for a simple misunderstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

with o2 their "Alternative dispute resolution" (or ADR) is Ombudsman Services: Communications which is who Jessica is referring to I think. (and IMO a toothless qango)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

with o2 their "Alternative dispute resolution" (or ADR) is Ombudsman Services: Communications which is who Jessica is referring to I think. (and IMO a toothless qango)

 

Ahh that lot of time wasters, pathetic!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...