Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday loans, refunds from banks.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am having issues with a few payday loan companies taking money from my account. They have been taking money via continious payment which means they can take it whenever they like i am led to believe. now i have contested with the bank about these which they have told me to wait until it shows on my statement which i did, and then got them to reimburse the amounts. i have cancelled all CP on my account but still more have happened one amount made me overdrawn then they still took another payment after this making me about 500 quid overdrawn! first of all is this allowed? secondly if i instruct the bank to cancel the continous payment do they have to? the bank said it is not gauranteed that it will be cancellled as its a financial company? also do i have to wait for it to clear on my statement or can i use this chargeback angle to get them to do it instantaniously?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a good read of this: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?336569-How-to-remove-a-lender-s-continuous-payment-authority(2-Viewing)-nbsp

 

If the bank fails to comply, they are breaking the law. That link covers everything in your post. Especially the part about your bank saying they might not cancel it because its a finance company.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for this, can i just ask whether anyone knows anything about this chargeback? the bank are saying i have to keep waiting for every amount to show on my statement, is this correct or can they refund the amount straight away?

 

I had over £500 put back into my bank by LLoyds this week so you can get it back. They will only refund from the date you asked in writing for the CPA to be cancelled and you will have to fight for every penny but it can and will be done. You need the disputes dept. and for what it's worth I complained quite loudly threatening the FSA and got £100 compensation, free upgrade of my account ( that I have now closed! ) and they have refunded the cost of my premium rate phone calls! Kick up a huge fuss and you will get it sorted! Oh and I tweeted about them as well! That really got them upset!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have already had amounts deposited back in my account the problem is as soon as it happens they just take it back out again before i get a cahcne to pull the money out! then i have to wait 3-4 days till it shows on my statement before i can request it to be re-debited, i just wanted to see if they can actually refund it before it shows on my statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i have just spoken with barclays, its the same, they have said they can request the stop from the pdl's but it doesnt mean they will stop trying and they physically cannot stop them from taking the money? he has advised me to swap my sort code and account number and get a new card which will then allow me to keep my account without the hassle of worrying about them taking the money. i have one payment die back in which i need to keep an eye out for to take it out as soon as it hits my account then i will be setting up the new account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays are completely wrong. have a read of the stickied on this forum about continuous payment authorities

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...