Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Banks have different limits above which they require Probate. So it may be Probate is not needed, although as he died with no Will that could complicate things. Is all the £28k with Virgin Money? Your wife should contact all banks who hold his money with the death certificate and ask them what they need to release the funds to her. Most banks have a central "bereavement department". Check their websites. Use that department rather than general call centre or bank branch if they have one. Nearly every bank website has a section on "what to do when a customer dies" so have a search for that. Your wife may also have to provide evidence that she is his daughter. When his wife died it sounds like they had a joint bank account so that's why her money just went across to him. But as it isn't a joint account now transfer to your wife won't be quite that simple.  
    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New Default Notice Regulations for Santander??


BelstarBomb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Today a mother at the school gate looked really upset and burst into tears when I asked her what was the matter.

 

Having got her back to her home and made her a cup of tea, she showed me two letters from Santander.

 

It appears it's a small world in that she too had a Flexible Loan account with cahoot and it was transferred to the loan account when Santander took it over.

 

She had buried her head in the sand and had not paid them in over 3 years. Her statements had been arriving with no monthly payment amount set etc and had received no other chasing calls, letters in all of that time.

 

She then received a default notice last week dated 30th January and the original balance has more than doubled.

 

She then received another letter yesterday saying that in 28 days, they would register the default with the CRA's if she didn't start paying.

 

I explained to her what had happened to us and that we had written back to Santander a couple of years back, challenged the rate increase and the refund had paid off what we owed.

 

However, when looking at the remedy date, I noticed that there wasn't one!

 

In it's place it said that the remedy date was 14 days from date of service, nothing else! No you must pay by 20th Feb or we may do X, Y or Z.

 

Have the regulations or requirements changed on this as I thought a properly created DN MUST have an actual date quoted for it to be compliant???

 

In addition, are Santander now playing hardball with refunds on the old cahoot Flexible Loan rate refunds and have stopped paying out?

 

I'm going to help her draft her response etc but wanted to double check on the above two questions first.

 

Many thanks,

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

That does in fact still stand Belstar which could render the DN invalid.

 

A more important tool in your armoury would be the failure to issue a Notice of Arrears CCA2006 amendments ....failure to comply with renders the claimant in default /unable to add interest/unable to enforce.

 

Arrears notice penalty:

Of course when a trader provides credit, the debtor may default, perhaps knowingly, perhaps unknowingly. Either way, the creditor is under a duty to provide the debtor with a notice stating that they are in arrears and owe ‘x’ amount of money.

 

A new amendment has been made in case of failure to give notice of sums in arrears in CCA 1974. Section 11 CCA 2006 inserts a new section - 86D - that sets out the consequences for a creditor or owner if he fails to give a notice as required by sections 86B or 86C.

 

If the creditor or owner fails to provide a notice of sums in arrears when required to do so, then during the period of his failure to provide the notice (i.e. from the date that it was required to be given until the end of the day on which it is eventually provided), he is not entitled to enforce the agreement. In addition,

 

The debtor or hirer is not liable to pay any interest that relates to the period of the creditor or owner’s failure,

 

Notice of default sums

Section 12 of CCA 2006 applies to situations where a debtor or hirer under a regulated agreement incurs a default sum.

 

A creditor or owner must give the debtor or hirer a notice in the specified form when a default sum becomes payable as a consequence of a breach of the agreement. For example, you hire a car for the duration of your holiday. There will often be a penalty sum payable if you incur a fine from using the car. The car-hire company might say this is to cover, for example, administration charges. Either way, certain sums are payable if you breach the agreement. Where this applies, the creditor must provide notice to the debtor, of the amount they must pay. This only applies where the default sum exceeds a specified amount.

 

Additionally, a creditor may only require a debtor to pay interest (in connection with a default sum) 28 days after the day the notice was given to the debtor. So if the creditor fails to give notice to the debtor then he can not enforce the agreement until notice is given.

 

Default sum

The term ‘default sum’ has been redefined in s.18 CCA 2006. “Default sum” now means: a sum payable by a debtor or hirer in connection with his breach of a regulated agreement (e.g. a charge imposed for late payment of an instalment due under the agreement or a fee imposed for exceeding a credit limit on a credit card). A default sum does not include sums that, as a consequence of a breach of the agreement, become payable earlier than they otherwise would have done. Nor does it include interest.

 

Interest on default sums

Section 13 has been amended so that a creditor or owner may only require simple interest to be paid in respect of default sums payable by the debtor or hirer. This includes sums payable under non-commercial or small agreements.

 

Minimum 14 days after Default notices

The new minimum period after which a creditor or owner may take action (in respect of the agreement after having issued a default notice) is now 14 days. It used to be only 7 days. Section 14 CCA 2006 amends section 88 of the 1974 Act to create this extension.

Additionally, under s87, a creditor or owner must give the debtor or hirer a default notice in the prescribed form if he wishes to:

Terminate the agreement;

Demand earlier payment of a sum;

Recover possession of any goods or land;

Treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred; or to;

Enforce any security.

 

 

Section 88 is also amended to allow the Secretary of State to prescribe information in the default notice to include any matters relating to the agreement (e.g. information about whether the agreement includes a term providing for the charging of post-judgment interest).

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow,

 

Thanks for this Andy. As you know from a previous thread any help directly or indirectly that helps me stick it to Santander makes my day!

 

Ok, I will be going round tomorrow tomorrow morning to help her draft her letter.

 

My original basis was to state the following

 

  1. That the DN is defective as it fails to show a specific remedy date
  2. That the amount shown to remedy includes incorrect amounts
  3. That the amount shown includes unfair interest and charges

 

Basically point three is based on the unfair interest rate increase that they had been paying out on. Is it still worth having a go on this?

 

With reference of the Arrears Notice Penalty, what you are saying is that as Santander failed to send monthly letters saying that you are in arrears by X and your monthly payments are Y and hadn't done so since say January 2010 to today they have no legal right to ask for what exactly? The payments and interest due during that period or the whole outstanding amount? Are you also saying that they cannot enforce the agreement at all now even if they were to go back and take off payments and interest accrued during that time to December 2009?

 

Sorry for firing these questions at you but I just want to make sure that we cover as many bases in the letter as possible to give Santander very little if anything at all to come back with save to say, no worries Mrs X, we're writing this one off!

 

Thanks Andy,

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow,

 

Thanks for this Andy. As you know from a previous thread any help directly or indirectly that helps me stick it to Santander makes my day!

 

Ok, I will be going round tomorrow tomorrow morning to help her draft her letter.

 

My original basis was to state the following

 

  1. That the DN is defective as it fails to show a specific remedy date
  2. That the amount shown to remedy includes incorrect amounts
  3. That the amount shown includes unfair interest and charges

 

Basically point three is based on the unfair interest rate increase that they had been paying out on. Is it still worth having a go on this? Not really required Bell ....the fact that they have failed to issue the Notice renders all charges unlawful (Default charges/ Interest /and penalties)

 

With reference of the Arrears Notice Penalty, what you are saying is that as Santander failed to send monthly letters saying that you are in arrears by X and your monthly payments are Y and hadn't done so since say January 2010 to today they have no legal right to ask for what exactly?Any arrears interest or penalties.... they are in default The payments and interest due during that period or the whole outstanding amount? Correct Are you also saying that they cannot enforce the agreement at all now even if they were to go back and take off payments and interest accrued during that time to December 2009? Cant enforce until such time they start to issue the Notice

 

Sorry for firing these questions at you but I just want to make sure that we cover as many bases in the letter as possible to give Santander very little if anything at all to come back with save to say, no worries Mrs X, we're writing this one off!

 

Thanks Andy,

 

Bel

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem Belstar

 

Let us know what transpires.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

My friend received a response from Santander today in response to her letter of complaint.

 

There is absolutely no acknowledgement or response at all to the Notice of Arrears 2006 failure even though that was the main part of the letter.

 

She had asked for PPI to be cancelled over 5 years ago via the cahoot message system and it wasn't actioned. Santander say that they have no record of this request! When she last wrote to them two years ago, she asked for it to be cancelled again and it still wasn't actioned. We mentioned it in the letter and they have responded by sending her a cheque for £70 by way of an apology for not actioning it before and that it being referred to the relevant department to be further investigated. Should she cash the cheque?

 

They fobbed her off about the unfair increase rise because no error has been made as it is a flexi loan and is within the T&C's

 

She had queried why her statements said Flexi Loan, yet the default notice said Fixed Loan and their response was it looks like a fixed loan as monthly interest has been suspended as it's in default.

 

In response to the defective DN notice and state that having reviewed her account, they have not breached their requirements under the CCA 1974 and the default stands even though there was no date on it.

 

They have then referred her to the FOS as they have nothing further to add!

 

She still has to hear back re the PPI and why it was not originally cancelled but what would you suggest she does in the meantime?

 

Thanks all,

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that is ''financial redress'' for their errors and should no affect any ongoing complaints.

 

Time a Formal Complaint was made to director level,.

 

Satans bank just get worse.

 

Do you mean that the default on CRA files has no date showing?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier,

 

Just double checked iwth her.

 

It states an amount but no date to pay that amount by.

 

Are you about to say that that still makes it sound even without the date?

 

However........

 

whilst we were talking, we suddenly realised that as Santander have now acknowledged that they should have cancelled her PPI at least 2 years ago, if not more should they find the communications from cahoot, then it goes without saying that the amount shown on the DN is wrong as it includes incorrectly levied PPI charges and interest on top to whenever they stopped charging interest.

 

She has also had a look thought the information that they sent for her SAR and it doesn't go back far enough, even though when she sent it, it covered the time when she asked to cancel the PPI via the cahoot account messenger.

 

What are you thoughts on them completely blanking the Notice of Arrears from andyorch?

 

Thanks Brig,

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the DN is to vague '' 14 days from date of service'', i guess they will work on 2 days for 1st class or 5 for 2nd.

 

Santander have been known to claim that they only keep data for 6 years, BUT it is actually for 6 years after an account is closed.

 

So challenge the SAR as incomplete and give them 7 working days to come up with the data you require.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok,

 

A little bit of movement.

 

My friend has called to say that Santander have now sent her a termination notice for the Flexible Loan (which they have now called a Personal Loan) for half the amount that was on the original default notice.

 

She has still to hear from them regarding the PPI as promised by the sender of below who said that the DN was perfect.

 

I think she should ask how they came to this figure as afar as she is concerned, she had originally indicated her wish to cancel the PPI 8 years ago via their contact manager to which they say they have no record. A rough calculation on that basis with 8% interest comes to a lot more than what they have reduced it by.

 

Also, they have still to respond fully to her letter of complaint.

 

What should her next steps be?

 

Thanks,

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to say that the letter also stated that they have stated that they will either pass or sell the debt on for collection and pass on default information to the CRA's

 

This bit is standard!

 

I would suggest your friend asks for a complete breakdown as to how the ''termination'' figure has been arrived at an she now expects Satans to fully answer the complaints.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

Very odd!

 

Just had a call from my friend who has received another statement from Santander. She has been away for two weeks and it arrived the day she left.

 

This one shows the PPI back on the balance but here's the odd thing - the balance was then zeroed! A credit was applied to the balance so it now stands at £0.

 

I asked her what else was in the envelope and she said nothing. No deed of assignment or anything. I asked her if she had received any other letters from DCA's etc and she said no.

 

Should she be cautiously optimistic?

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, This indicates the account has been sold on to a Debt Purchaser, she will not get a copy of the deed of assignment, in the very near future she will receive a Notice of assignment from either Satans Bank or the debt purchaser or the debt purchasers assigned DCA.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was my first thought Brig but I thought they legally had to send a letter advising her of this?

 

Also having admitted that they had applied PPI when they shouldn't have, taken it off, how can they add it back on and then sell it on??? How dodgy is that!

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to wait and see if it is assigned Belstar...NoA,s can follow after the actual assignment.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bel, I'm afraid that 's the way the system works, so now it's time to SAR Satans bank and get a PPI reclaim underway asap.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys,

 

With hindsight I've just told her that this might be a blessing in disguise.

 

She has it in writing from Satan's Bank that they should have cancelled the PPI years ago and that the relevant department would be in touch. They never did.

 

That admission has a knock on effect on the DN not by a few £100 but by at least £6000... in her favour!

 

She also has a statement where they took their calculation of the PPI off.

 

Her complaints has still not been responded to in full.

 

I'm sure if a carefully drafted letter to whoever now owns this points all this out and confirms that she will be taking them to court for the return of 8 years worth of PPI plus interest , having paid peanuts in the £ to buy it from Satan, I'm sure they won't want to be paying out any more!

 

What do you think - she would rather just be shot of them

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely think this is worth pursuing, and will happily help draft a suitable letter if required.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys,

 

With hindsight I've just told her that this might be a blessing in disguise.

 

She has it in writing from Satan's Bank that they should have cancelled the PPI years ago and that the relevant department would be in touch. They never did.

 

That admission has a knock on effect on the DN not by a few £100 but by at least £6000... in her favour!

 

She also has a statement where they took their calculation of the PPI off.

 

Her complaints has still not been responded to in full.

 

I'm sure if a carefully drafted letter to whoever now owns this points all this out and confirms that she will be taking them to court for the return of 8 years worth of PPI plus interest , having paid peanuts in the £ to buy it from Satan, I'm sure they won't want to be paying out any more!

 

What do you think - she would rather just be shot of them

 

Bel

 

 

I would think now is the time to make the PPI claim to Santander, and then a letter to the DCA/New owner of the account explaining that they have been misled in respect of this purchase. That at the moment a dispute is in place in respect of the mis sold PPI that Santander have admitted - that if the new owner decides to take this further, then you will defend as vexatious.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...