Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Potential Gross Misconduct. HELP.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner is currently suspended from work due to apparent gross misconduct.

 

His letter of suspension says that he has seriously breached health and safety at work and bought the company name into disrepute.

 

To breach health and safety, he hooked his feet on a metal bar and hung upside down and had a photo taken of him and uploaded onto facebook, whilst wearing his work uniform.

 

However, his company name is no-where to be seen on the uniform - just looks like general hi-vis wear.

 

AND this occurred on his break which is classed as UNPAID and the employees OWN TIME.

 

What are the chances of him being dismissed?

If he is dismissed, what are the chances of taking this to tribunal?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long has he worked for the company?

Has he been subject to disciplinary action before?

Was he on company premises at the time? If so, was he in the work environment or staff break room?

Was the metal bar there for the purpose of people to hang off it or for some other purpose?

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 years in total.

Has a completely clean record, always 30 mins early for work everyday.

Not on company premises nor in any kind of staff room.

The metal bar had no purpose other than just guarding some bushes I would say.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, i don't think he has much of a leg to stand on as its a very very silly thing to do. He could bring up his exemplary record, but c'mon. He grabbed a metal bar, and hung himself upside down from it. THen had his photo taken while in works uniform ( name of company doesnt matter if the uniform is recognisable and people know where he works), AND he had it uploaded to facebook.

 

Not to mention the very serious H+S issue.

 

 

The most he can do now is be very very apologetic about it and cross his fingers.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

He did not upload the photo to Facebook. Someone else did.

He has had his meeting to establish facts today, the manager said he was very grateful of my partners total honesty throughout.

 

Yes it was a silly thing to do. He does not have his company name on any kind of social networking site so whoever knows where he works is solely the people he works with.

 

The main thing we would like to know is whether it is gross misconduct as I said it looks just like general hi-vis wear, and he is technically off the clock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have to agree with renegadeimp very silly thing to do and it does not matter one bit about company logo not seen as has been said if the uniform is recogniseable and can identify the company.

 

be very apologetic about it will never happen again etc.

 

It also does not matter that they never uploaded the photo, especially if they are reccogniseable from that photo.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I understand that.

 

Do we have the argument that general hi-vis wear cannot be categorised to a certain company as there are no visible similarities as you can by hi-vis wear off the highstreet.

 

Could be just anyone doing it, for arguments sake.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. No argument there sorry. The employer could simply state the person in the picture and his job, and that his friends knew who he was and where he worked. Thats all they need. Especially if it shows any part of company premises. They would have to issue at bare minimum a final warning as to anyone who saw it, it would seem that the employer let this kind of silly thing happen.

 

The "could be just anyone doing it" wouldnt work, and indeed it hasnt seen it was your partner that was caught, identified and is now up for GM.

 

As i said, all he can do now is be very very apologetic and hope that they dont dismiss him, which in cases like this, there is a very high percentage chance that they will.

 

 

Now, if the metal bar was outside of work at home or elsewhere, then the company would have no say at all in the matter. Except he was wearing his works uniform and he knew it was his works uniform. If he tries to say otherwise, and he is found to be lying, then its guaranteed that he will lose his job.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed for your partner. As i said before, don't lie to the employer and be very apologetic. The only thing you could bring up is his exemplary work record.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...