Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tech v The Halifax ***SETTLED***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd November update: have received a link to a refusal template and have therefore refused their £579 partial refund, taking it as part payment only. I can seek the rest under County Court in 14 days and that now takes it under £5K so I can go to the small claims court.

 

Hoping they will see sense - although the words 'sense' and 'Halifax plc' should not really be used together.

 

Tech Vs Halifax

Claiming £5491

Got back £579 so far

Getting the rest back or die trying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck. Keep us all posted.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

update: 8th November. Received letter from the Halifax. "we offered you a gesture of £579 and you refused it" - too right! They also threaten to close my account if it's not managed correctly (already sorted myself with an account at Alliance so there! :( ). They say that I need to refer to the Ombudsment within 6 months if I'm still not happy. Is that a scare tactic? I'm ready now to go to MoneyClaim - should I just continue on as planned? What can the Ombudsman offer that the Courts cannot?

 

Any assistance please? Has anyone else received one of these letters before actually getting their money back?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a bit lost with things and hope someone can assist. I'm at the stage now where I want to enter my claim in the MoneyClaim website. The claim form discusses the right to claim interest - which naturally I wish to do. However it states that to claim interest I have to enter certain text within my claim of "The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from {date when the money became owed to you} to {the date you are issuing the claim} of £ {put the amount} and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of {enter the daily rate of interest}. "

 

The confusing thing is that I had already calculated on my initial spreadsheets sent to the bank their interest rate of 29.8%. Am I now only allowed to claim 8% as the claim form suggests or can I alter that to 29%? Or have I got this bit totally wrong? Plus how do I calculate the daily rate as they also suggest? Help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12th Nov 06: Claim now made via MoneyClaim website. The total was over 5K which means it cannot be heard in the small claims court - only hope to God that this is still going to go my way.

 

If it doesn't then at the very least I am shot of the Halifax and have an account elsewhere (although the new bank has probably had claims made against it too).

 

Here's hoping anyway. :)

 

Many thanks to all who've advised so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22nd November 06: Received from the courts that the bank intend to defend the claim. I've seen in other peoples' reports that this is standard from the Halifax as a final scare tactic. Here's hoping anyway.

 

They've 28 days to set up a defence. For those who've been to this stage before, have the Halifax paid up before a court date is set or just before the 28 days are up? Any advice would be most appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm worried. I've just seen another claim won by someone who started theirs later than my own. It would appear that the other claimant got to their settlement faster due to calls made to the bank and the courts. If that's the case, would anyone with successful experiences recommend calls or is there nothing to be gained after the MCOL begins by calling the bank to remind them you're there?

 

In my case the bank has acknowledged the claim and MCOL have sent out the confirmation of this saying the bank has 28 days to mount a defence. I'm about a week or two into that 28 day period so would a call assist?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantasy Banking theory.

 

Ever had the feeling that the banks deal with people on a points scoring basis? I have.

 

1) Send in a letter and you get so many points for starting something.

2) From that date you get points added daily, to build up to a required total before they do anything.

3) Phone them up, you get some points added for reminding them

4) Take legal action, more points to your account

...and so on

 

Day by day they only deal with the top points scorers at each level of the process. If you've phoned then you get dealt with a bit quicker than someone who has not...?

 

I have noticed that a visit to branch can often take points away from my score, as it's usually had the effect of delaying things rather than helping move forwards.

 

Amazing how your mind works when you're waiting for the bank to do something.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No! I don't think badgering the Halifax gets you anywhere quicker apart from chasing up the SAR.

We both had a 40 day expiry date on the 10/10. A date I calculated for - because it's my birthday!!!!

I did everything else exactly on the day I threatened, regardless. The only contact I had was one week prior to the 40 day deadline to remind them I would take them to court for non-compliance! My statements arrived one day before the deadline!

So, end result I'm ahead of you by at least a week.

YOU ARE IN CHARGE HERE NOT THEM!!!

MAKE THEM DANCE TO YOUR TUNE!!!!

 

Fight the good fight!

 

A D

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]"Another charge by the Bank?"

 

1st Claim (Current account)

30/11/06 WON! £3146.41

 

2nd Claim (Mortgage charges)

27/3/07 WON! - £277

 

3rd Claim (Credit card charges)

14/5/07 WON! £300

 

4th Claim (Old account 97-99 £444)

20/4/07 Prelim sent

9/5/07 LBA sent

Can't remember now but I WON!!!

My current thread - An A-Z - My previous saga

 

IF THIS HAS HELPED PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES - THANK YOU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. Can I pick your brains again for anyone who's gone down the MCOL route - what do I class as the first day of my 28 day countdown? e.g. my documents state the bank has 28 days to mount a defence. Do I start that clock from the date deemed to be served (18th Nov) or from the date on the letter confirming the bank had acknowledged the claim (22nd Nov). It's only a couple of days but I want to know so as to not miss out on a couple of days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The plot thickens. They've called today to say I've calculated the interest incorrectly. I've based my claim on their 29.8% interest charges on their cardcash accounts but they claim it's only 8% and they're not prepared to give the rest.

 

They also seem to think that the claim minus any interest is less that I'd calculated - and yet I'd done so from the statements.

 

Very confused.

 

Has anyone had this type of response from the Hali? I don't believe I've got my sums wrong nor do I think I've got the interest wrong but if anyone can shed any light on this I'd be most appreciative.

 

They say they'll go to court if I don't accept their reduced offer - about 3 grand less than the claim.

 

:confused::mad::rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

any advice on this would be most appreciated. I'm to contact them soon to say whether I agree or not.

 

In the meantime I've read elsewhere on the forum that the Hali often deny people can claim contractual interest. I assume this is the 29.8% that I've claimed. Looks like this is a scare tactic on their part but just wanted it clarified that I am in the right to claim the 29.8% and not the 8% they say I'm entitled to by someone who knows these things.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot claim contractual interest and 8%. One or the other, not both.

 

Thanks for your recent advice on this. The above is a previous comment you'd made when I was filing my claim with the courts and calling their bluff may be the way to go as they're claiming I cannot ask for contractual interest. Have you gone down this route/had it happen to you? If so, what was the outcome?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

they're claiming I cannot ask for contractual interest.

 

Well they would, wouldn't they. But it's not their decision to make, it's for the court to decide. Until that happens you have to decide whether to call or fold. It's a game of poker and they have found that by offering refund of the charges , but refusing to pay interest, some people are taking them at their word, thus saving them several hundred pounds. The more people who accept at that point the more they'll continue to do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...