Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help !!!!! / I have been served a statutory demand


nirandudu1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4127 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

nirandudu

 

I do not disagree with anything posted by 42man, however, what do you propose are the grounds of your intention to contest the SD and apply to set aside the same, because, as of the date hereof, you have not provided any evidence or argument to support a set aside app.

 

You appear to be contradicting yourself, you acknowledge the debt and agree that you do not dispute the same, now you appear to dispute the debt and wish to apply to set aside the SD.

 

If you contradict yourself here, you will contradict yourself in Court before the Judge.

 

If you have a valid defence that will defeat the SD, then I will of course assist or advise you on the same, however, as above, you have not provided any evidence here to support an action to set aside.

 

Please come back and update on the above.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You are right The Mould,i agree on the debt and didnt think i would have a chance if i dispute it,but then again i want it set aside on grounds that (1) There are unlawful charges to the account (2)PPI on account (3) they did not give enough time/warning before serving the SD - they claimed the visited my address on 8/12/2013,but they didnt post anything through my mail box in effect to that.The first mail shot i saw was on the 7/1/13 claiming that they attended my property on the 8/12/12 and 5/1/13 and that they intend to attend again on 12/1/13.They did attended on 12/1/13 with a letter dated 4/12/2012 accompanied with the SD

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right The Mould,i agree on the debt and didnt think i would have a chance if i dispute it,but then again i want it set aside on grounds that (1) There are unlawful charges to the account (2)PPI on account (3) they did not give enough time/warning before serving the SD - they claimed the visited my address on 8/12/2013,but they didnt post anything through my mail box in effect to that.The first mail shot i saw was on the 7/1/13 claiming that they attended my property on the 8/12/12 and 5/1/13 and that they intend to attend again on 12/1/13.They did attended on 12/1/13 with a letter dated 4/12/2012 accompanied with the SD

 

Thank you for your above post nirandudu.

 

Have you checked your own records of this account? Have a look at all the correspondence sent to you to see if you can find a valid statutory default notice and a Notice of Assignment.

 

PPI on the account may give rise to a defence-set off against the amount claimed, but you will need the details of the PPI to argue this.

 

Come back, roger - over.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had no idea it would come to an SD so all documents regarding the account has been shreaded since i couldnt make my contractual payment since 2008/9

 

Thank you nirandudu.

 

FM, default notice and notice of assignment arguments are not available then.

 

The unlawful charges argument, have you any paperwork to support this? Or did you shred everything including the statements they sent you?

 

PPI would appear to be your only valid argument against the SD for the amount claimed. You need to know the figures and present an argument asserting that the creditor is not entitled to amount claimed and that you have sent a letter to the creditor requesting that he engage in discusion with you with a view to settling this PPI issue and thereafter the parties can realisticly negotiate a repayment rate of the actual amount outstanding, to this end, until the PPI issue is resolved, I have sent the creditor an offer to repay the debt at a rate of £50 per month without any admission of liability to the amount claimed by him in this action. A copy of my said offer is served attached hereto marked exhibit "N1" (put your real initials).

 

Check the above out, see what others think.

 

Come back, roger - over.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR to barclay by RD then

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything has been shredded,the only alternative is to request for copies of all my statement from barclays i suppose.Thanks The Mould.

 

All very well, however, time is of the essence and the requisite response back from Barclays will be too late.

 

Argue that the SD should be set aside as their is mis-sold ppi on the agreement and that this issue needs to be resolved first as the creditor is not entitled to the amount claimed in this action.

 

And, as I stated earlier, make the offer in a short letter of £50 per month "without any admission of liability" (very important you state this) to the amount claimed. Send the letter by registered post to the creditor, state that you dispute the amount claimed as there is an outstanding ppi issue that he needs to resolve with you, enclude the first £50 cheque and request that he withdraws his SD, failing which, you reserve the right to disclose the letter to the Court at the hearing of your application to set aside his SD.

 

Try that nirandudu, see what others think.

 

You need to do something that will benefit you and not the otherside.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should i send in the set aside forms at this time also or wait for a response from them

 

Yes, goodness me nirandudu, you must follow the advice posted by 42man and others regarding the forms to set aside. Complete the said forms and have ready to file to the Court in time.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to fill in Form 6.4

 

For (a) fill in your name and address

 

The section that states attend before the Registrar leave blank. This will get filled in by the court.

 

For (b)

on the hearing of an application by (b) (insert your name)

 

An application for an order that the statutory demand dated (insert date on the SD that you received from (CREDITORS NAME) be set asidelink3.gif

 

For ©

The grounds on which the applicant claims to be entitled to the order are set out in the witness statement of the applicant sworn on (insert the date that you hand the forms into the court).

 

For (d)

The names and addresses of the persons upon whom this application should be served are:

(d) (insert name and address of CREDITOR/SOLICITOR)

 

For (e)

The applicant’s address for service is: (e) (insert your name and address)

Cross out where it states (Solicitor for the) and just leave the word Applicant and sign and date the form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i meant how do i FILL in the 6.5 form and does it have to be professionally sworn in,signed or sealed by a registra of oath?

 

nirandudu see below

The procedure to get a statutory demand set aside.

After the period of21 day from the statutory demand being served the person issuing the statutorydemand may begin the process that petitions the person’s bankruptcy.

One method ofavoiding bankruptcy is to get the statutory demand set aside.

To successfully geta statutory demand set aside one or more of the following must be satisfied:-

§ The amount statedon the statutory demand is disputed. (1)

§ The person issuingthe statutory demand also owes money. This is called a counterclaim. (2)

§ The person issuingthe statutory demand is holding security that equals or exceeds the amountowing.

§ The demand wasissued in error.

§ The amount owing isless than £750

§ Execution has beenstayed on a judgement debt.

§ The debtor iscomplying with an instalment order. This would mean the debt is not actuallyowed as it is being paid back.

§ The creditor failedto comply with the rules and prejudiced the debtor in the process

Point numbers 1& 2 (above) are sufficient grounds for a set aside app in yourcase.

Attach your offer letter as an exhibit (your £50 “withoutany admission of liability” offer letter that you have sent to the creditor)and refer to said letter in form 6.5.

Summary: you disputeamount claimed, there is mis-sold ppi and the creditor owes you repayment ofthe ppi, the amount owed is not established at the present time.

I hope the foregoing is helpful.

Kind regards

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello people,just thought i should update you on the latest and perhaps get some advice where required.

 

I got a letter from the county court yesterday saying that my application has been directed to the district judge who would decide if i have enough reason to request for a set aside.Can he refuse the application and what happens if he does?

 

Also yesterday,I got a voice message from BWLegal,a law firm working on behalf of Lowell,that i should call them "asap" to discuss about my monthly 50 pounds offer. Should i call them or just keep all correspondence with them to letters only? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...