Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock to repay £270m to loan customers


42man
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4059 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

According to the news this morning, this relates to unsecured loans taken out prior to 2008 and includes a large number of Together mortgages, they are reckoning on an average amount of £1770+ being paid out to individuals, basically any interest or charges applied to the loan since 2008

 

I have a live Together morgage with an £18k unsecured element, would be interested if this is to be offset against the loan amount, effectively reducing the amount owed.

 

It would be interesting to hear the legal implications of such an error from an enforceability angle - like a lot of Together Mortgage holders, I am unable to move as the loan element would attract an interest rate in excess of 11%

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you thinking unenforceability Spam ? It would be good to know where the wording was wrong......

 

apparently the issue lies with the statements issued by NRAM after NR was taken over, which under the CCA were required to contain the full amount owed and the breakdown of same. the statements which were issued did not contain this info, so interest could not be charged. How this could be construed as making the CCA unenforceable, I don't know (yet)

 

Up to now the only realistic argument that I have heard against the unsecured element of a Together Mortgage would be under CPUTR, basically making it impossible to move from NR without incurring a punitive interest rate on the unsecured lending. But on it's own I cannot see this being a winner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking that this was due to failure to comply with the new copy regulations in CCA 2006 section 77a ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry crossed post.

The requirements of section 77a say that if no yearly statement is sent then no interest is chargeable for that period.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking that this was due to failure to comply with the new copy regulations in CCA 2006 section 77a ?

 

I believe that this is the case, at least to some extent as it is to do with the mandatory information not being included in the statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been advised that breaching the CCA by failing to include mandatory information on the statements can be rectified by removing any charges and/or interest applied to the loan during the period of the breach and sending amended/correct statements.

 

This I believe, is what NRAM are doing :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how long they will drag their feet on getting these sent out, also, what about the ones over £20k, do we really believe that their statements were correct?, surely the system would have been the same for all non secured loans.

Edited by bizzisguy
need to learn to read....
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i think it may be this bit from section 77A

 

(6)

Where this subsection applies in relation to a failure to give a statement under this section to the debtor—

(a)

the creditor shall not be entitled to enforce the agreement during the period of non-compliance;

(b)

the debtor shall have no liability to pay any sum of interest to the culated by reference to the period of non-compliance or to any partof it; and

©

the debtor shall have no liability to pay any default sum which (apartfrom this paragraph)—

(i)

would have become payable during the period of non-compliance; or

(ii)

would have become payable after the end of that period inconnection with a breach of the agreement which occurs duringthat period (whether or not the breach continues after the endof that period).

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how long they will drag their feet on getting these sent out, also, what about the ones over £20k, do we really believe that their statements were correct?, surely the system would have been the same for all non secured loans.

 

Loans over £25k aren't covered by CCA, so there would be no requirement for any such statements to be issued, let alone be accurate, I believe that all of the loans involved in this situation have to be covered by the CCA for any compensation payment to be made, ergo, the loans would be under £25k. The media is reporting that NRAM will be sending out letters immediately and that it was only the new oversight processes that found such a basic error

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loans over £25k aren't covered by CCA, so there would be no requirement for any such statements to be issued, let alone be accurate, I believe that all of the loans involved in this situation have to be covered by the CCA for any compensation payment to be made, ergo, the loans would be under £25k. The media is reporting that NRAM will be sending out letters immediately and that it was only the new oversight processes that found such a basic error

 

The ceiling of £25k was removed of course in may 2008 for none business loans, so after this date the regulations will apply to larger loans

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ceiling of £25k was removed of course in may 2008 for none business loans, so after this date the regulations will apply to larger loans

 

Yes this is true, excuse my use of the word "aren't" instead of "weren't"

 

Since the NRAM issue only involves loans taken out before 2008, the CCA restriction still applies and there are no loans over £25k included in their compensation plan, this has also been reported in the media

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if it worth examining other loans, perhaps similar errors have been made elsewhere.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the SI that govern form and content of statements

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/1167/schedule/1/made

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to clarify, for people that have loans effected by this that are still live, they will NOT recieve a CASH refund, the balance of the account will be redressed to take into account the refund, accounts that are now closed will receive a cash refund.

 

Or at least that what I can make out from the reports I read on BBC news website.

 

Cheers,

Darren.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Have letters been sent to NRAM customers I have a together mortgage and a loan all taken out before 2008 I haven't received anything just wondered if anyone has

 

Yes I received a letter before christmas telling me they would let me have a difinitive outcome within eight week, if you haven't yet heard, it may be worth giving them a call, just to see if your loan was included in this issue

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi there,

 

I have started an action group called nram action group org uk for all disgruntled customers.

 

Have a look at the website and sign up as we need as many people as possible in order to take it further.

 

We are working on a lot of content to add as there seems to be so many issues with nram. We are also talking to Which, who might be able to back a super complaint to the FSA.

 

All our complaints are with the FOS and with a specialist team which seems positive. So fingers crossed we can get some sort of action from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Ceira

Been following your work on MSE so I'm a member here and glad to see you here!!

Iv had my redress applied but like you I'm disgruntled- just who do they think they are- No consultation no choices etc etc etc.

Would my next stage be a complaint? Are you trying to get the money back rather than a re/structure of your mortgage?

 

Cheers

 

C

 

 

Hi there,

 

 

I have started an action group called nram action group org uk for all

disgruntled customers.

 

Have a look at the website and sign up as we need as many people as possible

in order to take it further.

 

We are working on a lot of content to add as there seems to be so many issues

with nram. We are also talking to Which, who might be able to back a super

complaint to the FSA.

 

 

All our complaints are with the FOS and with a specialist team which seems

positive. So fingers crossed we can get some sort of action from

them.

Edited by citizenB
tidied quote links
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ceira

Been following your work on MSE so I'm a member here and glad to see you here!!

Iv had my redress applied but like you I'm disgruntled- just who do they think they are- No consultation no choices etc etc etc.

Would my next stage be a complaint? Are you trying to get the money back rather than a re/structure of your mortgage?

 

Cheers

 

C

 

 

UOTE=ceiralennon;4201872]Hi there,

 

I have started an action group called nram action group org uk for all disgruntled customers.

 

Have a look at the website and sign up as we need as many people as possible in order to take it further.

 

We are working on a lot of content to add as there seems to be so many issues with nram. We are also talking to Which, who might be able to back a super complaint to the FSA.

 

All our complaints are with the FOS and with a specialist team which seems positive. So fingers crossed we can get some sort of action from them.

 

Hiya, I would definitely complain officially to nram, they will not uphold it, then you send it to fos. There is so many complaints about nram with them they are looking at a mass complaint so the quicker the better.

 

Keeps us updated.

 

Thanks

Ceira

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...