Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice on Vanquis please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody,

 

Im new to this site so i hope ive posted this in the right place.

 

 

I have a Vanquis card that is in default although i have been making some payments towards the account. According to them my balance is £1234.00. I haven't had a statement from them since june 2012. i have had letters from Impact since june.

I spoke to Impact today and they agreed a settlement of 50% (£617) which i said i could probably pay within 7 days if they put this in writing stating that it was a final payment to close the account.

The guy i spoke to would not send me anything in writing in the post but would only send me a email, which i find rather concerning. I have read that this lot will try anything to recover the debt.

 

 

the email says

 

SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNT

 

 

Your balance with Vanquis Bank still remains unpaid, however to bring the matter to a close we are prepared to consider accepting a discounted amount in settlement.

We can discount your balance by 50%

This offer is only available for 7 days from the date of this email.

Please contact us immediately either on 0161 2226 216 or email us at [email protected] to discuss a mutually acceptable settlement amount.

If you do not respond to this proposal within 14 days from the date above, we will continue to collect the full balance.

 

Our opening hours are:-

Monday to Thursday 8am to 8pm

Friday 8am to 6pm

Saturday 8am to 1pm

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Collections Team, Vanquis Bank

 

Id like a little advice please

1. Should i accept this email as proof that if i pay the settlement that the account will be closed and they will not chase for more money?

 

Should i go back to them and insist in written conformation of the settlement and not accept this email?

 

When i pay off the settlement can i ask vanquis to remove the default from my credit file or am i lumbered with it for the next 6 years

 

thanks in advance

chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

Im new to this site so i hope ive posted this in the right place.

 

 

I have a Vanquis card that is in default although i have been making some payments towards the account. According to them my I is £1234.00. I haven't had a statement from them since june 2012. i have had letters from Impact since june.

I spoke to Impact today and they agreed a settlement of 50% (£617) which i said i could probably pay within 7 days if they put this in writing stating that it was a final payment to close the account.

The guy i spoke to would not send me anything in writing in the post but would only send me a email, which i find rather concerning. I have read that this lot will try anything to recover the debt.

 

 

the email says

 

SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNT

 

 

Your balance with Vanquis Bank still remains unpaid, however to bring the matter to a close we are prepared to consider accepting a discounted amount in settlement.

We can discount your balance by 50%

This offer is only available for 7 days from the date of this email.

Please contact us immediately either on 0161 2226 216 or email us at [email protected] to discuss a mutually acceptable settlement amount.

If you do not respond to this proposal within 14 days from the date above, we will continue to collect the full balance.

 

Our opening hours are:-

Monday to Thursday 8am to 8pm

Friday 8am to 6pm

Saturday 8am to 1pm

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Collections Team, Vanquis Bank

 

Id like a little advice please

1. Should i accept this email as proof that if i pay the settlement that the account will be closed and they will not chase for more money?

 

Should i go back to them and insist in written conformation of the settlement and not accept this email?

 

When i pay off the settlement can i ask vanquis to remove the default from my credit file or am i lumbered with it for the next 6 years

 

thanks in advance

chris

 

To be honest Chris, no I wouldn't. Vanquis told me on the phone they'd take a setllement payment, they never did. And defaulted me I've just discovered. I'm trying to work out how to challenge this. Don't trust them. Get it in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes get everything in "proper" writing.

 

But also bear in mind that before getting involved in full and final settlements, reclaim all unlawful charges on the account and their associated interest first.

 

You also need to get it in writing that the balance after making any payment will not be sold on or passed to any other party for collection.

 

The default will remain on your file for six years.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies.

I have agreed to pay the settlement fee.

I questioned the phone operative firstly has the account been passed to outside collection company ?

the operative stated that the account was with them and hadn't been sent out to any other companies.

secondly i asked, if i pay the settlement without it in writing, how do i know the account will be closed and i will not be chased for more money?

the operative stated that they would be breaking fsa rules if they didn't honor the settlement offer

finally i said, before i pay the £617 im requesting the tapes of this conversation as the proof of verbal contract for settlement

the operative said they have made the request and the tapes will be with me in the next 2 weeks.

i verified that i would make the payment of £617 on receipt of the tapes.

 

ill wait and see if the tapes arrive before i contact them agin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need this settlement offer set out and agreed in writing, not in a telephone conversation. This is regardless of whether they send the recordings which is highly doubtful anyway.

 

You cannot trust these people...get it in black and white.

 

What have you done about any charges on the account?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with ims

 

you need it in writing that they or no-one else can pursue for the rest

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I wrote to Vanquis last week offering them a settlement figure. I asked them to respond in writing to confirm if or not they accept the payment and that if accepted, the money could be with them within 7 days.

 

They have persisted on sending me texts to say that a missing payment is due. I contacted them to say that I would not be making a payment until the original offer had been accepted or not in writing. They said that they do not respond in writing as they do not have a draft letter for such requests. They have verbally accepted my offer and I am supposed to be ringing back later today. I intend to record the call myself in case they eventuall dispute what they have agreed.

 

I know I've not done the right thing but I felt pressured into agreeing to paying. Would I better off not calling and keep on sending letters until I have something to confirm the acceptance? They've said that they will keep adding interest and charges to the account which will likely decrease my chances of my original offer being accepted as a F&F figure.

 

I have registed with Step Plan and I have an appointment to speak to a debt advisor next week. I just want this out of the way as it's making me ill.

 

Any steps on how to proceed would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They said that they do not respond in writing as they do not have a draft letter for such requests.

 

:pound: So they have no one in their organisation who can write an original letter? Unbelievable.

 

If it were me I would still do all of this in writing and get on with claiming back the charges before even looking at a settlement.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite within your rights to have all of this set out in writing. You do NOT have to communicate on the phone.

 

The fact that they don't appear to have the combined intelligence to compose a letter is not your problem.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the letter I have drafted.. any advice or tweaks would be appreciated :) :)

I write in reference to the above account. I sent aletter via special delivery which was received by Vanquis on xx.

Within this letter, I confirmed that I could raise£xx in respect of the account and would offer this as an ex-gratia payment infull and final settlement on the account. It was offered on the understandingthat, if accepted, neither you nor any associated company would pursue the debtin any way and that I would be released of liability.

I also requested that any entries made on creditreference agency files relating to the account would be marked as satisfied infull.

I requested that any response from Vanquis was madein writing which I feel is not an unreasonable request as a customer.

I was informed on Wednesday 12thDecember 2012 that Vanquis do not respond to individual requests and thatdespite my offer of £xx being accepted verbally, bizarrely they could notfollow this up in writing before payment was made.

I have taken advice from various bodies includingthe Office of Fair Trading, the Financial Ombudsman and Citizens Advice whohave advised me in no uncertain terms not to make payment until I have receivedwritten agreement from Vanquis accepting my full and final offer.

To date, I have received no acknowledgement orresponse to my offer, so therefore I would like to make a Subject AccessRequest in order to ensure that the original offer is a fair and justifiedoffer.

I enclose a payment of £10 in order to request alldata that you hold about me. This includes, but is not limited to, thefollowing:

1. The original signed,executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to theaccount at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of alltelephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephoneconversations by your company, or by any previous creditors.

3. Where there has been anyevent in my account history over this period which has required manualintervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or noteswhich have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or otherevidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly heldwith ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any noticeof assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or theoriginal creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to anyinsurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms andconditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collectioncharges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amountof the charge, a detailed financial Breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and whatthe charge covers.

7. Specific details of thefees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and adetailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and onwhat date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of anynotice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third partyagencies to whom you have disclosed my personaldata and a summary of the nature of the informationyou have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration ofthe credit agreement.

Ienclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Ifthere is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself asto my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that theabove address is the one which you normally use to communicate my privatebusiness to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

Duringthis time, I will make token payments towards my Vanquis account until anamicable agreement between both parties is made and confirmed in writing.

Inaddition, I have registered with Step Change formerly known as the Consumer CreditCounselling Service. My reference numberis xx and I am taking advice from them on the management of thisdebt.

Tore-iterate, I request that any further correspondence with regards this accountto be in writing only and do not wish to be contacted either via telephone ortext message. Any attempts at contact via telephone will be reported to OFCOM,Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading.

Ilook forward to hearing from you soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...