Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg - did not pay out on PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm still going through Mrs Sam's bank accounts and credit card accounts looking for mis-sold PPI.

 

I have sent a SAR to Egg and they have finally complied with over 400 pages of information!

 

Mrs Sam took out an Egg credit card back in 2002 which ran until 2008.

 

During that time she paid an average of £30.00 per month PPI.

 

I'm ploughing through the paperwork to see her signed agreement for PPI but I haven't found it yet

- there appears to be everything else though.

 

Mrs Sam cannot remember how it was sold to her back in 2002.

 

Mrs Sam became ill in 2008.

 

At this time she had her own business.

 

Her illness has sadly resulted in her being unable to work.

 

She has been on incapacity benefit since February 2008.

 

She had to wind her business up at that time.

 

She wrote to Egg on 22 November 2008 to see if she could use her PPI but did not receive a response.

 

That letter contained a letter from her GP and her incapacity benefit letter.

 

Due to her illness she did not pursue the issue until March 2010 when she wrote to Egg again.

 

They did not reply to this letter either.

 

She chased them in April 2010 and she finally received a response at the end of April 2010.

 

Their response was that the insurance does not lie with Egg and she should have taken it up with the insurer.

I do not understand why they did not reply to her letter in 2008 with that information.

They said that this information was detailed in the document that she had read and agreed to in 2002(!)

They also said that the PPI on the card was cancelled on 6 November 2008 as the premiums had lapsed due to her not making payments to the account.

 

She was unable to make the payments due to her incapacity!

They subsequently put the Egg account in the hands of their Collections Department and then to ARC.

 

Neither of them were able to get any money from her (as she wasn't earning any!) and now the debt is back with Egg.

They don't appear to be chasing her for it any more.

 

So where do I go from here?

 

I want to claim back the PPI payments which must amount to somewhere in the region of £2,800 before interest.

 

What are the issues concerning her unsuccessful request for a payout on the insurance earlier?

 

All advice gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam

 

Was Mrs Sam self employed when she took out the account and insurance?

 

Also Egg had a policy of pre-ticked boxes for on-line applications for which I believe they have been sanctioned.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21.

She wasn't self-employed when she took out the policy. She was working for a company at that time. I've looked through the paperwork again and I can't see see the PPI agreement anywhere. There is a copy of her signature on the Credit Agreement for the Egg card in 2002 but it does not mention PPI at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then use the company sick scheme reason

 

she was already covered 6mts full 6mts 12 pay.

 

to 'assume' egg sold the policy correctly

 

is a bit crass for the person to write back to her to fob her off.

 

in 2002 its possible the application was not made online?

 

the sar should tell you how she applied

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - ha

 

So you have the signed agreement and no mention of PPI.

 

Sounds like that's the clincher because if she didn't agree to it or apply for it then it would appear that they have slapped it on the account Willy Nilly. That is a No No.

 

That would then mean that your concerns about unanswered correspondence is academic and as I see it you have a valid claim for mis-selling.

 

Grab a copy of the fos consumer questionnaire from here and complete it

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

Also, if you have all of the statements, have a go at completing this spreadsheet...follow the instructions in the "Notes" tab

 

FosRunningPPI v102.xls

 

Send the completed questionnaire and a print of the spreadsheet to the lender together with a brief letter requiring refund.

 

They may well come back and say that Mrs Sam agreed to it on the phone (We've seen that one before) in which case they will need to provide evidence/transcript of that call. Of course they won't be able to though.

 

They will have 8 weeks from receipt of the claim to give you a final decision.

 

Shout here if you need help.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can use their right of set off to put the refund against the account. Any excess would be paid back to Mrs Sam.

 

If the account has been sold to a third party then there is no right of set off.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...