Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lowells statutory demand - **SUCCESSFULLY SET ASIDE - PLUS COSTS ** CHEQUE RECEIVED NOW **


d33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received yesterday evening,

 

date on demand is 11th sept,

 

i assume date of service counts as from yesterday.

Not statute barred,

 

so need to find another defence to set aside,

 

The demand was put through door in plain envelope,

i had same problem a few years ago with another company connaught, which blem over,

but for some reason i think this could be real from other threads i have read,

really worried as i have a mortgage with equity,,

any help would be grateful,

 

excuse typing as on phone on my lunch break!

Edited by d33
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Does the 18 days count from when i received the demand was dated 13th sept but appointmemt was for yesterday and received it yesterday through communal entrance, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 days starts from deemed service. would prob need to prove service if disputed.

if poss out of time, then when applying for set aside would need to explain and request extension to the time limit.

check out lowell sd threads etc

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

So the 18 days is from yesterday? from what i have read it costs them £100 +to pay process server, so they must be serious (just odd that there isnt a name of a process server on form, just a signature). this has come at a bad time as i am away for the next few days, and really dont have my head on tonight to deal with this. but i will definitely be looking to get this set aside (if possible), which from what i have read so far seems easy, yet people are being made bankrupt for unsecure debts ?.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob be from when put through the door, dependg on circumstances. they would have to make a statement re service and what day delivered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you find the original CCA request ? If it was me in your shoes then I would send them a letter by recorded delivery similar to the one in here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?367607-I-need-some-help-please!!!-1st-Credit-Statutory-Demand%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

 

You will find that they may see sense and drop all action....

Link to post
Share on other sites

i couldnt find the original cca, so i sent another one to them recorded delivery last week, the layout was similar to your letter but i didnt mention to them about me setting aside, should i also send a SAR to the original lender?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read through alot of threads over the last few hours and im beginning to get in a bit of a panic. it seems this company have made alot of people bankrupt recently, these people all seem to be in a similar position to me.

My main concerns at the moment are:

 

- the date on the demand is nearly a month ago, even though i only actually received it last week (seems like a common practice of theirs)-- what if everything has already happened

 

i sent off the cca request last week, once the 12 days have passed do i assume they dont have it(am i in the clear?), bit comfused as read somewhere they have another 30 days after this to produce

 

 

 

Do i have anything to lose by getting a set aside (from what i have read no) but i find the layout confusing ie do i write ' the defendant disputes' or ' i dispute' , because when i tried to do this before a few years ago i was told by the clerk that i need to present it from my angle with bullet points. ie is it worth me getting a solicitor to write it for me ?

 

 

 

 

A solicitor advised someone on another board that he had little chance of getting a set aside, and in fact getting one is harder than what is made out (often judges will side with the creditor)

 

-If the statutory demand has been filed with my local court, would the court tell me over the phone if i ring , and do i assume they are 100 % serious about applying for the petition if they have done this.

 

If everything does get to the petition stage, would i be given any leeway time wise to sort out repayment via a loan (which my father could possibly arrange), bearing in my mind i have a house which i really dont want to lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i have found another box of paperwork, supposedly relating to this debt, and found my cca request recorded delivery slip !

 

the request was sent to credit rosource solutions ltd in 2010, to which they responded over a month later with various bits of paperwork one of them being credit agreement without a signature or date on it !

 

the account number on the credit agreement is different to the one on the statements that they sent.

Edited by d33
Link to post
Share on other sites

d33

this is what the insolvency rules say

'Where the debtor (a) claims to have a counterclaim, set-off or cross demand (whether or not he could have raised it in the action in which the judgment or order was obtained) which equals or exceeds the amount of the debt or debts specified in the statutory demand or (b) disputes the debt (not being a debt subject to a judgment, order, liability order, costs certificate or tax assessment) the court will normally set asidelink3.gif the statutory demand if, in its opinion, on the evidence there is a genuine triable issue.' Insolvency Pract Direction 13.4.4

some further info also

http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/Publications

 

generally when applying to set aside, an application will either be dismissed straight away or a hearing scheduled to hear the application.

as posted before, you may be out of time depending on when it was served. in which case would need to explain circumstances eg communal box etc, and request on form application is heard out of time ie an extension to the time limit. this may be heard at the hearing if hearing scheduled.

if don't apply to set aside, they may then go on to petition re bankruptcy at some point. depends whether they are serious or using it as a 'bluff' (an SD doesn't formally'expire' as such unless setaside. or perhaps withdrawn?, so they would have the petition option otherwise or if no settlement). a petition can also be challenged, although it is a bit further down the line. if apply for set aside, and it is not granted then cred would still have the opp to petition, and J would have the option to order permission for a petition within x days. and if setaside granted, then they won't have the petition option.

could try for an undertaking from them that they will not proceed with petition if you need/want time to negotiate a settlement.

if able to get legal advice, do so.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a letter saying they were going to serve me the statutory demand on xx date, so this will surely be adequate? I cant really afford to risk the consequences of what could happen so i think the best option to speak to them and negotiate providing they withdraw the demand

Link to post
Share on other sites

it prob would be from when sd actually served. but can mention that letter when/if applying for set aside. yes, if they 'withdraw' the demand. otherwise, it would remain open? though any adhered to agreed arrangement would prob go towards negating any petition if they then went on to that.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, from what i have read non compliance of cca is not much of a reason, and i dont want to stress myself for another 40 days waiting for sar response.

I assume once i negotiate and get it in writing that they wont petition i am ok? or could they take monthly payments and then go ahead?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...