Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice needed Parking customers only


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya, I run a pub with a very small car park right next to a busy hospital & I am really confused about my rights on how to stop the hospital visitors from parking in the pub car park, as they take up the few parking spaces meant for my customers. My business is a dying trade & every month I struggle to make ends meet, so I need to be able to keep those spaces clear for my genuine customers. I have notices displayed saying clamping in operation but as I have never actually carried out the threat they have little effect. I am now worried that the new clamping laws will give them an open invitation to completely abuse the use of a free cark park. I am aware the hospital charges an obscene amount to park in the grounds so I understand why people will try to avoid paying & take a risk on parking in my car park but I simply cannot afford to lose any more customers. I am not totally heartless & if someone is polite enough to pop in & ask if it’s ok to park I do allow them to park there for a short time as long as they put a small donation in a local charity box displayed on the bar. It’s the ones that park there all day without asking or attempting to pop into the pub to purchase anything that I need to be able to stop. Please can someone explain what my rights are rights on stopping them from doing this in the future?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who owns the pub and the land that is used for the car park.

If you dont own it outright you have no legal right to invite anyone to park on it in the first place.

Just as I dont have the right to invite you to park on my neighbours drive.

 

Clear that up first.

Expert on Parking matters, Banned by MSE ! along with other parking experts on orders of the BPA !

here to SAVE you money !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the pub open all day? I know pubs which have barriers which they unlock at opening time. It won't stop unauthorised parking, but should reduce it, as I would think most hospital visitors are daytime, and most pub trade is nighttime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother in law has a 10 year lease on the pub & I am the manager, as it's such a small pub only one member of staff is needed at all times so it would not be easy to keep leaving the bar to let genuine customers in. I was hoping there were some signs I could display warning of action that could be taken for the consistent offenders, I do not want all the hassle of issuing tickets & then trying to recover the fine, I would just simply like to be able to prevent non customers from taking up the few spaces available

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any issue with getting a tow truck into remove any offending vehicles as long as signs are clearly displayed that unauthorised vehicles will be towed unless the car registration is registered inside the pub. That means whoever parks there needs to enter the pub to register their car if they want to avoid it being towed. You will only need to get one or two cars towed and the word will get around. When they come into the pub to register, ask them what they want to drink. probably won't cost you anything for the tow truck as the issue will then be between the two truck operator and the person that parked illegally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any issue with getting a tow truck into remove any offending vehicles as long as signs are clearly displayed that unauthorised vehicles will be towed unless the car registration is registered inside the pub. That means whoever parks there needs to enter the pub to register their car if they want to avoid it being towed. You will only need to get one or two cars towed and the word will get around. When they come into the pub to register, ask them what they want to drink. probably won't cost you anything for the tow truck as the issue will then be between the two truck operator and the person that parked illegally.

The Protection of Freedoms Act specifically bans vehicle immobilisation and/or removal without lawful authority

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Protection of Freedoms Act specifically bans vehicle immobilisation and/or removal without lawful authority

Thanks for the heads up! BTW surely having a barrier is as good as immobilising a vehicle and this could open a can of worms i.e. if you are in a NHS car park and it is barrier controlled and you want to leave without paying as it is private land and you were invited onto the land?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads up! BTW surely having a barrier is as good as immobilising a vehicle and this could open a can of worms i.e. if you are in a NHS car park and it is barrier controlled and you want to leave without paying as it is private land and you were invited onto the land?

There's an exception to the ban on immobilisation where the immobilisation is by means of a fixed barrier which was present when the vehicle was parked - linky. Intended to allow pay-on-exit car parks to operate, but how long before ex-clampits start running pay-on-exit car parks and impose a £500 "lost ticket fee"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said above in 3 the only way is a control barrier, no signs will deter, but you can try.

you can ask customers to come in and ask for key to let theselves in and out again, hassle and would probably put people off going there.

Pay on exit( with a token from you) barrier will work, but will have large capital outlay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an exception to the ban on immobilisation where the immobilisation is by means of a fixed barrier which was present when the vehicle was parked - linky. Intended to allow pay-on-exit car parks to operate, but how long before ex-clampits start running pay-on-exit car parks and impose a £500 "lost ticket fee"?

 

They would ned pemission from the land owner. Can you imagine the chaos if someone refuses to pay and holds up every one behind them. Supermarkets will soon abandon that idea. Tesco tried it in Kidderminster and they had to abandon the idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately these automatic barriers often are self raising on the entry side and work by way of a metal detecting circuit on the floor in front of the barrier .

So clever motorists who feel blocked in just pick good timing, put the car jack on the loop and drive out of the entry barrier, pick the jack up and drive away.

Expert on Parking matters, Banned by MSE ! along with other parking experts on orders of the BPA !

here to SAVE you money !

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Protection of Freedoms Act specifically bans vehicle immobilisation and/or removal without lawful authority

 

The Act says:

(1)A person commits an offence who, without lawful authority—

(a)immobilises a motor vehicle by the attachment to the vehicle, or a part of it, of an immobilising device, or

(b)moves, or restricts the movement of, such a vehicle by any means,

intending to prevent or inhibit the removal of the vehicle by a person otherwise entitled to remove it.

so I think if you tow the vehicle off your land and onto the nearest piece of road, you are potentially within the law because there is no intent to prevent the removal of the vehicle (I would guess you'd need clear signs warning of the risk).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some very interesting bits of advice have been given & I'd like to say a big thank you to all of you that have read & commented on my car park problem, I will keep you all informed if anything exciting happens concerning action taken against some of the persistent offenders

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...