Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPML / Capstone charges & ERC reclaim


pete42
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi...can anyone help me.

 

I had a mortgage with spml and also a loan with sppl from 2002 - 2006.

 

During this time like a lot of other people ran into difficulties,

finding myself in and out of court with repossesion orders..

...I was charged ridiculous amounts for admin fee amongst others.

 

..We eventually had a repossesion order granted against us but fortunateley we managed to sell the property in time.

 

..We were charged £13,500 ERC on the mortgage.

..and £6000 ERC on the secured loan...

 

The other fees and charges during this time were outrageous.

 

I believe we also had PPI on both these accounts that we were not aware of.

 

DO I HAVE A CHANCE OF TAKING THESE SHARKS TO COURT TO GET OUR MONEY BACK???

 

Any advice would be much appreciated

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI pete

 

i've created your own thread

 

yes ofc ourse you can hit them

 

and prob wont need to do court

 

certainly not on the PPI or the PENALTY charges side

 

as for the ERC , i dont remember at this moment.

 

have you ALL the statements?

 

if not might be worth an SAR first

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks DX

 

I am going to high wycombe on monday in person to their offices to pay the ten pounds for all my statements. does it matter that this was from 2002- 2006....My main gripe is the redemption fees even though we had to sell at no profit to cover these charges... has anyone won these back under these circumstances...

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I turned up at their offices today with a letter in hand asking for all my statements as I had lost them..

 

...After a few minutes I was greeted by Andy from customer services....

 

I handed him the letter and told him that I needed these statements for tax reasons (he believed me)!!!

and within 15 minutes he was back down with all my statements.

 

I told him that I was under the impression that a £10 fee was applicable to which he simply replied "dont worry"???

 

Back home going through these statements I was charged a total of £3500 in Arrears management fees,

£400 in Litigation fees,

£500 in Agents fees,

£350 in Repayment fees,

£250 in Unpaid direct debit fees,

£6700 in Legal costs ( was in court 3 times to appose repossesion orders)??? and

£5600 in early repayment charges ( even though at the last hearing the judge granted me 3 months to complete the sale to pay of the mortgage which we did....just)

 

My first question is which of these can I claim back??

 

My second is if I was to charge them interest on these amounts how does that work?

Is it 8% per year from when the charges were made??

 

Look forward and appreciate any advice

 

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPI shoul show

 

if you look in the stickies of the link i sent you

 

you cant sort out what you can/cannot reclaim

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

THANKS.. i HAVE LOOKED THROUGH THEM....cOULD YOU TELL ME IF THE INTEREST ON ARREARS THAT i WAS CHARGED IS RECLAIMABLE??? ALSO THE 8% THAT I CAN CHARGE IS THAT PER YEAR FROM WHEN THE MORTGAGE WAS PAID OFF UNDER THE POSSESION ORDER SO FROM 2006 UNTIL WHEN I SEND THEM THE RECLAIM REQUEST TOMORROW??

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can reclaim int at THEIR rate on any fees you reclaim. until the mortgage was settled.

 

then 8% on the TOTAL of your first SOC @ 8% till today

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

schedule of charges [spreadsheet]

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

enter the PENALTY fees in the 4th one here

end the claim on the date you settled the mortgage

use THEIR int rate.

 

take the resultant figure

 

and enter that is the FIRST spreadsheet

 

under the date the mortgagewas setlled.

 

that should then give you the 8% stat till today.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

If you had a fixed term mortgage check if you were repaying the mortgage within that fixed term, for example the fixed term might be 3 years, if outside of the fixed term there is no way you should have to pay that amount of ERC. If you were within the fixed rate term look back at your original documentation when you first took out the mortgage that will tell you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi....Well after 8 weeks of waiting finally today a 5 page reply to my complaint of arrears management fees arrived......They are basicall saying that they are allowed to charge these fees and that they will not be reimbursing them....What do I do now??? The FOB is from what ive heard is a waste of time...Do I go down the court route???Is this a standard reply from them???And does anyone have any experiences of this...Please help me... Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX...

Can you let me know that even though I was in arrears at the time these charges were being incurred, I am still able to claim them back through the court. If these charges have been deemed 'unfair'.....and although my mortgage with them was redeemed 6 years ago...how can they still be charging them to other people today??please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes makes no odds

 

they are an unlawful PENALTY charge

 

matters not wht state the account was in

they do NOT truely represent their admin costs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou. Is there a draft or anything that will give me an idea as what to say on the paperwork for the court?? And what else should I send in with the paperwork..

 

Thanks in advance..

 

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

In the early days of CAG some people tried to claim Early Redemption Charges and lost in court costing excessive amounts in costs so I wouldn't suggest you try for that.

 

You should ask for copies of their solicitors bills to make sure they aren't charging more than it cost them.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I had prettying the same issues as you with SPML.

I managed to claim the ERC charges back without going to court however.

Basically I argued the toss with them about they required 1 month notice on the sale of the house and therefore repaying the mortgage.

They stood fast with the arrears management fee though and in the end cut my losses and settled for about £2000 from them when I had calculated they owed me around £8000.

Saying that, it took a lot of letters going back and forth. They originally offered a couple of hundred pounds... But with persistence I got the £2000.

Looking back I wish I had the guts to have taken them to court, but reading some horror stories on here I decided to cut my losses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...