Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

blue snail V natwest


blue snail
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello i am new here,

I have read many posts in the forum and its reassuring to find people in allmost the same situation as me with natwest advantage gold accounts. I have all my old statements going back 6 years and the total is going to be around £ 4,500. I still cant find any example letters or template letters here can anyone help ? ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there and welcome to the forum :)

 

All of the templates you're looking for can be found here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/

 

Have you read the FAQ's? If not then I would seriously recommend that you do so before sending any letters in order to avoid problems further down the line...

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ! my name is blue snail and i am just starting a claim against natwest on a advantage gold account because they have taken £ 3737.00 from me in the last 6 years and i want my hard-earned money back !

 

Right the bit i dont understand is in the template prelim letter is sais "What i require ; I calculate that you have taken £XXXXX plus £XXX which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken"

 

O.K. now i have been reading the forums every night this week and from what i can gather you dont add on interest at the prelim stage only much later in the process so why is it in the prelim letter ? ?

 

I understand the concept of adding APR by dividing 8% by 12 to give a monthly figure, then multiplying by the number of months since the charge occured etc etc.

 

I just want someone who has allready been through this to say what they wrote in this part of the prelim letter to natwest, i am cool with everything else and want to get it sent off tonight . . any help please ? ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 2 instances of interest you can claim:

 

1.When you go overdrawn the bank will charge you interest, perfectly lawfully.

 

However, if part of your overdraft is made up of penalty fees, they are also charging you interest on these too and it is this interest which you are entitled to claim back, but it's tricky to separate out from the total interest figure.

 

Vampiress has a spreadsheet, (the advanced one), in the bank templates library, which attempts to calculate this

 

It's quite complex and unless your claim is large may not amount to that much, so for simplicity's sake, some people don't bother

 

This is the interest referred to in the preliminary and LBA letters.

 

2. Section 69 8% interest on your claim, but only when you submit a claim at court. Don't add this interest before moneyclaim

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Michael. Therfore would you say its worth claiming the interest on £ 3,737.00 ? The charges were spread randomly over the last 6 years so i could take each charge in turn and work out the interest to the present day but it would take a long time.

I just wanted to find someone who has already successfully been through the process and what they put at that stage of the letter - i guess most people just left out the interest bit which is what i may do in the knowlegde that i may be able to add on this 8% apr thing at the court stage, am i making sense ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claiming overdraft interest on £3737 esp dating from 6 years ago could add several hundred pounds to your claim.

 

Claiming contractual interest would add significantly more. This long thread explains more:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html?highlight=contractual

 

Vampiress and Mindzai both have s/s which work this out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blue Snail here still struggling with interest element ;

 

Just to re-cap - I am just about to write my prelim letter to natwest

 

- I am going to claim £ 3737. in total going back 6 years, my overdraft limit is £2000. on an advantage gold account and during the 6 years i have allways been overdrawn and sometimes over the £2000 limit - but not for very long

 

- Here is what i am trying to work out, i wish to calculate and then add an interest element to list in the prelim letter as per the template and i want it to be realistic but not so ridiculous to give me a good chance i dont want to be too greedy i.e. on a £3,700ish claim + interest of 400 or so.

 

- this is how i have tried to work it out manually ( I didnt care much for the spreadsheets and they wont work on my mac anyway) ;

 

For example in 2001 in 1 month I had charges of £ 224.00 . . ok

- The monthly agreed % on agreed overdraft is 1.3%

- This would equate to £ 2.91 at the end of that month ( 224 x 1.3%)

- The charge occured 58 months ago so £ 2.91 x 58 = £ 168.78

 

So what im saying is using this method it will be hundreds of pounds - too much ? ?

 

Has anyone tried doing the same thing or am i totally barking up the wrong tree ? Im thinking of not including any interest at this stage cos its too much hassle but i dont like giving up !

 

Any help greatfully received as ive been thinking about this for days !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Question and update :

Ive got to the stage where I am ready to take natwest to court by moneyclaim online but ive been reading the threads to see what the likely outcome/response will be from corbetts.

 

It seems like they are requesting more details - when i sent my first letter i didnt itemise every single charge as there are many many over the last 6 years i just gave monthly totals. Ive since been back over every statement and noted the details of every charge and the problem is

 

a) Ive made two mistakes in my adding up totaling about £20. (not much in a 4K claim)

b) When i added the interest monthly i rounded it down to the nearest whole pound

 

This means my response to them if they request more details will be slightly different to the first letters to natwest is this going to be a problem ? should i put the revised totals on the court form N1 (or its online equivelent)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the errors are in their favour I wouldn't worry too much but be sure that you aren't claiming the Advantage Gold Fee. That is a legitimate service charge that you can't recover.

 

I suggest that you submit your itemisation on an excel spreadsheet stating the date the charge was made, the amount and the reason given for the charge.

 

Make sure you keep copies because they will almost certainly ask you for them again at a later date.

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks paul

 

The errors are in MY favour to the tune of £26. so I am a bit concerned. I sent the original list neatly typed up in a sort of table because I have an old applemac and exell doesnt work very well. The thing is do I send a revised (and more detailed breakdown) schedule now to cobbets or cobblers (whatever the name is) because I will be doing it online and shall I put the revised amounts on the N1 or whatever its online equivelent is ?

 

Your help is greatly appreciated, I want to do it tomorow as the deadline is up. please excuse my spelling by the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brief update and a question from me ;

 

O.K. I am an advantage gold customer claiming charges back over the last 6 years a total of 118 different charges totalling £ 3763. i have then added interest myself (not using spreadsheet) at a rate of 1.22% per month (standard credit zone rate) this totals £ 833.

 

So I have just filled in a claim at MCOL which should have been begun to be processed this morning. I made a mistake - when i sent off my prelim letter/ LBA etc. I totalled the charges up to the end of each month and submitted those details on my schedule. I then read up about what would be the likely response from their solicitors Corbetts - requesting more info or a brakdown of charges etc. So I went back through the statements and wrote down every single charge, the amount, what it was for etc. This is when I found two mistakes I had made previously to the tune of about 25 quid - Silly me

 

Anyway I have now typed up a fully comprehensive list of all charges it looks very neat and fills 3 sheets of A4, the new revised totals I put on my MCOL claim.

 

Question : Should I now send the new very comprehensive and more accurate schedule straight to CORBETTS with a covering letter in anticipation that they are likely to ask for it later anyway ? ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as the amounts on your MCOL are accurate the previous error shouldn't present any sort of problem. Bear in mind that Natwest ALREADY KNOW how much they have charged you.

 

With regards to contacting Cobbetts in advance - definitely don't do that. There are several cases now where Natwest have kept things in house so I would advise that you do nothing further until you get a response to your MCOL. It will probably be the standard defence and CPR Part 18 request so wait for it and see what they say.

 

Paul

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Paul that has set my mind at rest. I read on here somewhere that someone was sending their revised schedule to the Northampton county court but I dont know, I think I will sit tight in the knowledge that I have the info here at my fingertips should they request it.

 

I dont hold much hope in getting my money this side of xmas but never mind I knew it would not be a 5 minute job from the outset. If i get board of waiting I can start my claim on HSBC ! !

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i get board of waiting I can start my claim on HSBC ! !

 

 

Are you male or female blue snail?

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Blue snail here. I couldnt find my own thread so i started a new one, sorry !

 

Ok here we go . . . Today as expected on the last day of the deadline I received Cobbetts defence, I am struggling with the legal language. Its quite short and appears to refer only to the particulars of claim. There is no mention of PART 18, or allocation questionaire or which track the claim would take. I have retyped it here verbatim ;

 

1) .This defence is filed and served without prejudice to the right of the defendant to apply for summary judgement in respect of and/or to strike out the p.o.c.

 

2) without prejudice to the non-admission set out in the foregoing paragraph, if and to the extent that the claimant proves the allegation that the defendant debited charges to his bank a/c , insofar as such charges were dibited on a date or dates more than six years prior to the issue of this claim, any remedy in respect of the same, whether damages, restitution or otherwise, is barred by the operation of the limitation act 1980 and/or the doctrine of laches and the defendant will apply to strike out this aspect of the claim and/or summery judgement.

 

3) The defendant is embarrassed by the lack of particularity pleaded in the p.o.c. to the extent that the p.o.c. fail to disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim against the defendant in particular ;

3.1 The p.o.c. set out no facts indicating what the claim is about, are incoherent and do not disclose any legally recognisable claim against the defendant.

 

4) the defendant invites the claimant to remedy the above. In the event that the claimant fails to so so within 14 adys of the service of the defence then the defendant will apply to the court for an order to strike out the p.o.c.

 

5) the defendant reserves the right to plead further to the p.o.c. once and if the claiment properly particularises the same. in the meantime, it is denied that the claiment is entitled to the relaif claimed or any releif whether as pleaded or at all.

 

 

My questions are if anyone can please help : I didnt put hardle any detail in the p.o.c. in my mcol and I realised this was wrong shortly after I did it so I can put more detail in but do I just send it to them in a letter ? ?

 

I have a good idea what to include in the letter but is there anything that I shouldnt mention ? I dont want to ramble too much in the response.

 

Also do i send a copy to the court ?

 

Why havent I been sent a A.Q. or will i get one soon ?

 

I have a more detailed breakdown of charges (schedule) now should I sent that as well ? ?

 

 

Any help whatsoever greatfully received ! !

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi bluesnail

if you go into users CP at the top of every page and click on subscribed threads, you will be able to find your original thread

im no good on the legal stuff, but if you had used the POC in the library, then you shouldnt have had any problems , seems like they might have a point, but thats only my opinion

Bob and sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks rbrears thats a huge help. I had done everything so carefully up to the point of filling in my mcol then I just fluffed it ! I read the small claims pack but I didnt find the mcol details in the templates section until after I had gone through with it so I was annoyed with myself. Anyway I think I now have the right info to do a revised p.o.c.

 

I know this is a very simple trivial question but on the covering letter from cobblers it says " please acknowledge receipt " how exactly do I do that ? Do i phone cobblers or write to them or write to the court ? Or can I do it online on the mcol site ? ? I know its a dumb question but thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

blue snail here again still slightly confused ;

 

I have a letter ready to type up that runs allong similar lines to the threads ive been reading from 'natwesttookmymoney' , charleyspencer and rbrears . The letter contains basicly a revised and far more detailed p.o.c.

 

The question is do I just send a copy to the court and a copy to cobbetts, Im confused because I read somewhere that you are effectively doing another p.o.c. and you have to pay again. I also read that If you send it to the court they will somehow sanction it and create a sealed copy which they send back to you for you to then send to cobbetts ???

 

As i said i have formulated the letter ready to type up and i am happy that it contains all the relevant info im just not sure what to send where and when.

 

As ever any help greatfully received ! and thanks to all who have helped in the past

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is do I just send a copy to the court and a copy to cobbetts,

Yes.

 

Im confused because I read somewhere that you are effectively doing another p.o.c. and you have to pay again. I also read that If you send it to the court they will somehow sanction it and create a sealed copy which they send back to you for you to then send to cobbetts ???

This is if you file an amendment to your claim, but you shouldn't have to do this since Cobbetts in their defence 'invites the claimant to remedy the above. In the event that the claimant fails to so so within 14 adys of the service of the defence then the defendant will apply to the court for an order to strike out the p.o.c.' effectively agreeing to you submitting fuller POC's.

 

Cobbetts can't strike out the claim, only a judge can and if that happened you would be given notice to correct it before it was actually struck out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Michael Browne. I shal put the letter in the post tomorow morning and see what happens after christmas. I started my claim in October thinking origionally I may get some money before xmas, never mind I expect it will be late January now but its well worth the wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Michael Browne. I shal put the letter in the post tomorow morning and see what happens after christmas. I started my claim in October thinking origionally I may get some money before xmas, never mind I expect it will be late January now but its well worth the wait.

 

 

I take it you are joking ?

Cobbetts are not known to pay in 2 months......in fact your user name and them have more in common than you might think !:rolleyes:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...