Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LOC and neither was it sent with the last one either. The LOC is under the name of FCA Automotive.  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since this court claim,  Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LOC and neither was it sent with the last one either. The LOC is under the name of FCA Automotive.  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since this court claim,  Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LOC and neither was it sent with the last one either. The LOC is under the name of FCA Automotive.  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since this court claim,  Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LOC and neither was it sent with the last one either. The LOC is under the name of FCA Automotive.  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since this court claim, 
    • Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LOC and neither was it sent with the last one either. The LOC is under the name of FCA Automotive.  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since this court claim, 
    • The UK still lags far behind its main European counterparts, both in terms of sales and reputation.View the full article
    • thanks for the block of text...................now spaced above we never told you to respond at all unless you get a letter of claim and then comeback here FIRST. i suggest you do so now. NEVER EVER enter into pointless letter tennis... dx  
    • they mention terminated in the POC, but thats a red herring and means nothing. did they ever send a Default Notice to you please? and do you have it? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PC World Whatever Happens Club (Advice Needed)


young077
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi new to the forum but hoping someone can help me.

 

Over the past few years I have bought a Acer Desk top and Dell Netbook fromPC World, both of which I have being paying for the Whatever Happens Club membership. 3 years for the Acer and 2 years for the Dell.

 

A couple of months back I booked both in for the yearly MOT check / tune upthat is included in the membership. This is the first time I have done it and only did it to get something for my money.

 

Big mistake I found, first time I have used the service at all and found nothing but problems. I collected my property the next day to find that both had cosmetic damage to the outer casing which had occurred whilst in store(clearly stacking equipment on top of each other as i could see with otherstuff in there). I complained about this as I collected my equipment to which the smug reply was as it is cosmetic damage it is not covered by the policy. To which I stated that even if I didn't have that cover I would expect this issue to be sorted as the damage was done as my property was left in their care. The result was an offer of a £20 voucher. I refused and requested to speak to a manager, who I was told was too busy to speak to me and when I said I could wait I was told this would be the case for the whole day. I was very annoyed that I was fobbed off by the duty manager however I left the store and rang the help line.

 

I made a complaint about my issue and was promised a call back however this did not happen leaving me to return the call two weeks later. I was offered a £25 voucher and when I asked how that was possible for damaging both computers they said as the person who handled my first call had logged it as one inciden tit could only be dealt with as one incident. Despite me paying two premiums and damage to two items. I again turned this offer down planning to write to head office.

 

My Computers however have been slow and unreliable making them virtually unusable. I vowed to resolve this issue when I wrote a letter, as I no longer trusted the service I would receive, however before I had the chance I was deployed to Afghanistan as I am in the Army. During this time my wife has lost a paid job on a online bingo site due to the computer issue making her unreliable,resulting in a loss of a minimum of £600 a month for the last three months but this would often rise due to overtime. My wife and I have also been left with a huge amount of stress over this time. As she could not resolve the issue as shewas not prepared to deal with the company due to the problems we had previously and the fact she is pregnant. I have spent three months over there where my few phone calls home have been stress and worry as my wife had lost her job and income she relied on.

 

Where do I stand? I am totally unhappy and want something done about this, I have in my head that I deserve to be refunded for the computers that are now no longer used and the money I have been paying for a cover that was useless dueto incompetent Staff. Thoughts, opinions and advice appreciated guys.

Edited by citizenB
formatted for easier reading.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made any attempt to clean up the computers, it's usually a software problem when they run slow?

 

This is what I sent them to get done and they came back useless. I did not expect them to come back barely working and damaged cosmetically too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm a bit lost now, warranties don't include malware or internet junk removal?

 

as part ouf the service pc world offer yearly mot and tune up. Basically a clean up which is what I took them for. Both worked fine but I was taking advantage of the service. Why not? But they come back unable to do anything on. It seems like these companies take your money then do nothing from there.

Edited by young077
Link to post
Share on other sites

as part ouf the service pc world offer yearly mot and tune up. Basically a clean up which is what I took them for. Both worked fine but I was taking advantage of the service. Why not? But they come back unable to do anything on. It seems like these companies take your money then do nothing from there.

 

On my paperwork as annual pc tuneup designed to keep your computer or laptop running at top speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made an official complaint - in writing - to the head office ?

 

We have a pcworld rep on the forums, I will send an S.O.S. for you. Once the rep makes contact, follow the instructions given and keep us updated on the progress of your complaint.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made an official complaint - in writing - to the head office ?

 

We have a pcworld rep on the forums, I will send an S.O.S. for you. Once the rep makes contact, follow the instructions given and keep us updated on the progress of your complaint.

 

I didn't as I said I had other things going on and didn't get a chance. Wood like to know what to do thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I get that now. If that is the service they have offered and you paid for it and they have failed to honour that service, then I don't see why you can't write and ask for a refund of all the premiums you have paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't as I said I had other things going on and didn't get a chance. Wood like to know what to do thanks

 

Pretty much write a letter along the lines of what you have already advised and as Conniff has suggested. Send to Head office marked as an official complaint.

 

I have invited the PC rep to look in as well.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

and as to the damage in store

 

ask the store for a copy of their "SIT" form

 

stores are ment to carry out this on reciet of the laptop its one of the things you sign

 

if it doesnt list scratches on the laptop then inisit on a repair

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So let me just check I got this? Both your laptops both worked perfectly fine. You took them for a tune up and they came back out of it cosmetically damaged and both running so slow that they were unusable? Were the laptops checked over before they were taken in to ensure the damage wasn't there before? What did the report say was done on them?

 

There are two main things that slow a computer down in these cases. The hard drive is nearly full or hasn't been organised in a long time (defrag etc). The second is spyware/malware/viruses. Both are not likely to have been caused by the store, so I am not sure what they could have done that rendered both operating systems useless.

 

After you found the laptop's had decreased performance after they were taken home, why didn't you get straight back to the store to tell them what happened and allow them to investigate what had been done in store? They would have needed the chance to investigate. They can't be held responsible for the fact you had to go away to work and that your wife lost her job over this. Both laptop's could have been made serviceable, at the very least, by reinstalling Windows and then putting your data back on the computers. I am not saying a clean install is the first thing you would run on a slow computer, but it's often a very quick way of correcting any and all software problems. This would have been a very quick fix and something that wouldn't have dragged on and caused your wife to lose her job.

 

Your whatever happens cover was in place on both laptop's and would have kicked in if you needed them for repair/accidental damaged etc so it wasn't pointless.

 

What's the status of the laptop's now? Do you need help getting them up and running again?

 

Yeah thats right. they didn't bother to fill in their report to say they were undamaged. To be honest I didn't trust the store with my property again, the fact a manager made excuses not to speak to me made this lack of trust and confidence even greater. I understand what you are saying but they failed me at the first hurdle damaging my equipment. The complete opposite of what I have spent hundreds of pounds on over three years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Paul - CurrysPCWorld

Hi Guys,

 

Thanks for taking the time to post young077. I am sorry to read that you have experienced an issue when booking your computers in for the annual health check.

 

If you would like to email me at [email protected] and please include the full details of your issue, including dates of when the H/C was done and I will be able to look into this for you to see what can be done.

 

Please note any photos that you can supply me that show the consistency of damage would be greatly appreciated.

 

All the best,

 

Paul

The KNOWHOW Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

PC World is subject to the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. This means that if they are providing you with a service, they are required to exercise reasonable care and skill in providing you with that service. Returning your laptop to you damaged and performing worse than before is not exercising reasonable care and skill. Give PC World a chance to make good the damage your laptop sustained whilst in their possession and fix poor performance you asked them to rectify. If they refuse, you should serve a written notice on them giving them 14 days to put matters right to your satisfaction, after which you are entitled to have the work carried out by another service outlet and recover the cost from PC World. Contrary to what large retailers may say, they are liable for consequential loss under the Act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thats right. they didn't bother to fill in their report to say they were undamaged. To be honest I didn't trust the store with my property again, the fact a manager made excuses not to speak to me made this lack of trust and confidence even greater. I understand what you are saying but they failed me at the first hurdle damaging my equipment. The complete opposite of what I have spent hundreds of pounds on over three years.

 

sorry only just noticed this reply

 

if the store have failed to fill in there form then THEY are in the wrong

they must list any pre-existing damage if not then they must basicly admit it wasnt there before

 

contact paul hes excellent, explain there was no pre-existing damage on the sit form, therefore the damage happened in store, if its damage caused instore then they CANNOT class it as cosmetic - no matter how light

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...