Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default listed with incorrect date


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I hope someone can help me with this issue.

 

I had a loan from Egg which I couldn't afford to pay back when I lost my job back in 2005. The account went into default in 12/05/2006 and was passed onto Cabot Financial.

 

The default from Cabot was due to be removed in May 2012, which it was, however, now the default has been relisted by Egg dated 30/11/2010, meaning it will not be removed from my account until 2016!

 

My partner and I were waiting for this default to be removed before we try to get a mortgage to buy our first home. I have no way of paying it back so the default is satisfied quickly as the default makes up around 15% of our deposit.

 

Now I know for a fact that this was originally defaulted in 2007 with Egg, but I have not kept any paperwork or proof of that being the default date.

 

Is there any way of getting this default removed, or proving that the default date of 30/11/2010 is incorrect without having a hard copy/proof of the original default?

 

Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated by myself and my partner.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Mike

Edited by karky
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, This sounds very odd to me, the first thing to do is

register a notice of dispute with the CRA (s) that are

showing the entry, then you must contact Egg regarding

the default date.

 

There can only ever be one default/default date for any

debt.

Make this a FORMAL COMPLAINT which should be addressed

to their DATA CONTROLLER.

 

The complaint should include proof of the original default date

and a screen print of the current entry.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

thanks so much for your help.

 

The only problem I have is that I have no proof of the original entry for this entry.

 

I literally have no paperwork or correspondence with Egg as I discarded it when I moved home a number of years ago. Is there any other way that I can prove the original entry and default date?

 

Thanks

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try the CRAs for archived reports, or a Subject Access Request

under the Data Protection Act 1998, this will show all the data

the original creditor has on the account.

There is a statutory fee of £10.00 and the creditor has 40

days to reply, use the template from the CAG library.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with this I have a very similar story Egg seem to have relisted with the same default date 30/11/10

 

Now I have a letter from Cabot that says they bought the alleged debt 12/10/09? I thought these things had to default before they were sold on?

 

I've sent SAR to Egg their 40 days are up on 12th June

Edited by Noshovel
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, very surprising but at the same time refreshing news!

 

I sent egg and online message asking for the postal address and name of their data controller and explained why I needed those details. I pointed out that I had received advice that a debt can only ever have one default date and that this date was May 2006.

 

They replied saying they acknowledge the error and that the default would be removed from my account. To my surprise, 24 hours later, it has subsequently been removed.

 

I think this is the easiest resolution I could have dreamt of!

 

Thanks for all the help and advice.

 

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a result IMO shows that going to the right person compliance manager/data controller

beats normal channels!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Brig

 

Riding on my sucess with the above I check the rest of my experian report with a fine tooth comb. I found another error this time ***yds *** Bank I noticed that the entry in the experian report had the default date 08/08 where as my records have the default notice issued 12/07

 

I sent a letter to the "CDR Data Quality Team" asking them to investigate and make a correction they have not replied but I have recieved a reply from Solicitors who acted for the Bank in respect of litigation regarding this debt (I'm paying a regular sum every month). The reply indicates that they agree that the default notice was 12/07 but they account was referred for recovery 08/08

 

Which date then shoudl be the correct default date in my experian entry?

 

Help and comments are all very much apprecated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First one is the correct date. Not the second

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, DN dated December '07 default registered usually around 14 days

later? Referred for recovery August 08 seems a big time lag.

The date on the file should be a short period after the DN was isued.

 

You need to get back to the Data Controller and demand to be told what

date the default was actually placed, ignore the ''team'' write directly to

the DC by recorded delivery.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

First one is the correct date. Not the second

 

Not necessarily, 12/07 is DN issued date, the actual default date will be later!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see, so even though we have a long time lag here it is "possible" I suppose. The letter is from solicitors acting for the bank so I guess they should know. I do recall fretting about being taken to court in August 08 this is because my Mum took me on holiday at that time to get me some rest:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date the debt was sent to recovery is most probably

not the default date.

 

As for solicitors knowing anything == what they have been

told by their client!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...