Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4 hours were soft play with the kids then moved to one of the restaurants for a meal. Restaurant took ages with our order but it was a group of parents so we were in no massive rush.  Ive been trying to find how to determine 100% if the road is public or not as I just based my assumption on the street signs, traffic lights and the bus. Regarding the PCN, does it covers all requirements needed to enforce or do you guys see any clear weak spots? Considering the size of the place and different areas and businesses reachable through that road where the cameras are, I believe is a massive assumption to use those photographs to calculate the time someone was actually parked in a designated parking spot as there are numerous other areas to load, unload, wait for people, drive throughs of restaurants, etc all within the area accessible through the one road where the ANPR is. One can go through most of the areas on street view in google. You can even see a car parked in the middle of the roundabout for example.
    • thought your story rang a bell. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416315-knightsbridgecreditfix-iva-treated-me-very-badly-thinking-of-bk-now-help/ you vanished and never cameback. dx  
    • and it legally informs them of your correct and current address as you must do with all old debts last paid/used in say 7 yrs you dont want backdoor CCJ's. what were the names of these IVA scammers, the one you took it out with, and the one that scammed you to let them take over please? your story is slightly worrying. dx  
    • Incidentally, congratulations on not buying the warranty. That is another Big Motoring World rip-off. See what we have to say about extended warranties and the Big Motoring World attitude to them is particularly unhelpful
    • well that google is from 2019, but the photos are certainly of someone driving on the public highway in/out by an ANP system, though the site of where the camera actually is, is not showing there are anpr cameras up by the low yellow barriers but they wont get from facing shots from there. interesting, needs to be checked if the road IS a public highway but on private land, cause as you say, if the whole area is max 4hrs , how does the hotel work< ?? must have a reg entry system.  now as for taking pictures of cars on a public highway then guessing the are parking ...erm.... i dont thnk thats right nor allowed under GDPR. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

tax credit review letter


britishred
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i received a letter from hmrc. they are checking my award as a single person for 2011-2012. the information they have shows my husband living with me. i have claimed working tax credit and child tax credit since 2000 which is when i separated from my husband, we have never divorced. we had seperate bank accounts and i paid all the utility bills, council tax etc and the agreement was that he paid the mortgage. over the years he has used our address for loans and credit cards as where he was living he wasn't allowed to .

in 2009 after his mothers illness and eventual death we reconciled

as by then we both had alot of debt between us (i forgot to mention we have four children ) we contacted a debt management company who advised us to open a joint account and close our old ones down as we had loans with the banks. we opened the account in nov 09 and wages paid into it dec09.

he moved in the family home in jan 2010 after settling bills at his other address. i did not inform hmrc as we were paying back a huge amount on the debt plan and i felt that i could not cope. i lost my job the same year and claimed job seekers allowance for six weeks.

i found another job but have been claiming tax credit . i have no proof that he has not lived with me for a long time and our financial ties link us together .

i have contacted them and am waiting for them to ring me back. i like most others can't sleep, feel sick i haven't told my husband. what will happen to me? am i classed as a 'big fish' will they prosecute me i have claimed for so long ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

No like most others you are a little tadpole :-)

 

You will have to pay back what you owe either by reduction of a subsequent award or by direct payment (with time to pay - although HMRC will expect an income and expenditure statement to substantiate the time to pay arrangement)

 

Just gather as much information together as you can to provide details of your hubby's non residence and the subsequent reconciliation.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for the advice. my husband paid cash to the friend he shared their batchelor pad with. there is no rent book or recorded agreement no direct debit payments to prove he lived there. the friend moved away from our area in 2010 and we have no way to contact him for proof but then his word would not suffice i guess. will they look at my claims as a whole or just from when he moved in? what evidence will they want?

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this mean that once i tell them that we reconciled in 2010 they will look at that award . i mean if i just address their query for 2011/12 they will want to know the date he moved back in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the first phone call just to confirm their suspicions? and then do they contact you by letter then? do you know roughly how long they usually take to deal with the enquiry and do they want the money paid back asap?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, your first post said you had a letter.

The length of time they take to deal with the check will depend upon how long it takes for them to get all the info in.

Generally speaking, any overpayment will be recovered from a subsequent award; if there is no subsequent award, a time to pay arrangement will be set up

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

well its the end of the week and not heard a thing the waiting is awful . work has been the hardest trying to ' be myself'. everyone has noticed that i don't seem myself. i hope they contact me next week i havent told my husband he didnt know that i had carried on the claim but why should i burden him with this . wanted to post on here because lots of you in the same boat. i am terrified of what they are going to ask for back i am already on a debt management plan. i cant wait to wake up like others have said and not think tax credits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone help? my husbands company went paperless in 2011 so all wageslips and p60 are on line, would hmrc accept a printed copy of a p60? also if they suspect you have been living together what other proof will they want to prove it and how much so that i can start getting it together ? thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if the payslips etc are on line, HMRC will accept the printouts.

HMRC will, when considering if a couple live together, look at things like bank and building society accounts (to check if finances are separate) rent book, mortgage statements, council tax bill and utility bills (gas/electric/phone)

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

considering that i have been claiming in all for twelve years and we have had seperate bank accounts for ten years and a joint one for the past two years how far back are they going to want to look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

during 2010 i lost my job and claimed job seekers allowance. i received the basic rate £65+ a week . I claimed it for seven weeks in total , i would have been entitled to this wouldnt i? i have worked all my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really not sure on the rules for JSA, hopefully one of the experts will look in on this and confirm that for you or if not I can flag up the post for their attention

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am looking at kizzy 1972 post similar story to mine and her update suggests a jail sentence . is that what i am looking at? thats what i meant about being a big fish. those who have claimed the most ... jail them ??? i am now terrified ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am looking at kizzy 1972 post similar story to mine and her update suggests a jail sentence . is that what i am looking at? thats what i meant about being a big fish. those who have claimed the most ... jail them ??? i am now terrified ,

 

 

Don't assume you're going to jail just yet britishred. I know you are very worried and probably can't be talked out of it, but I think it might turn out not as badly as you think. :D

 

So long as you co operate, HMRC favour civil investigations. They say that themselves, and if the stories over recent years on this forum are anything to go by, this seems to be the case.

 

Solicitors aren't infallible either - maybe the solicitor was basing his knowledge on experience of JSA fraud (in which case they are more keen to prosecute).

Edited by lis79
Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou. as you can see i cant sleep. was i entitled to jsa for those seven weeks? aren't they based on national insurance contributions of which i have paid? i had about £700 in jsa in all and the first time ever that i had claimed 'dole'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just found a bank statement from our old joint account and i realised that i had a debit card to that account which i had used during the time we were apart. the more i try to prove to myself that the split was legitimate so i can prove to them it was the more i realise that we were financially linked together alot. so what do i do when they ring me up and ask when my husband moved back in do i say jan 2010 as it was because then they are going to want previous years bank statements the fact that i paid all my own utilities which were in my name wont count for anything and as i have said he has no proof of previous address so what do i do ? do i say to make me accountable for the twelve years because they will have proof that we were financially linked and i cant prove he wasnt here at my address until 2010. i would rather get it over with . if i am accountable for twelve years the cost will be 80000 + i reckon isnt that a jailable amount ? please help and just tell me that a huge amount like that is a crown court case. i know you dont know the answers but in past cases what has happened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just found a bank statement from 2009 and i had a debit card in my name on my husbands bank account. yes i had used it for shopping. but when they investigate i look totally linked to my husband financially and even though i paid all of the utility bills from my account the fact i cant provide proof that he never lived here and he has loans etc in this address and looks like he has financially supported me, they are going to ask when he moved back i am saying jan 2010 but bank statements etc say otherwise. so what do i say to them ? do i say make me accountable for twelve years to get this overwith? i would owe i estimate £70000+ i dont want to make myself a liar even more yes i claimed dishonestly for past two years but cant prove my innocence anyother way. i am scared to admit anything . i have spent the whole week trying to find something to prove we were apart the more i look the finances push us together. please advise me do i tell them that i have heavy financial links and let them investigate it all . if i owe a huge amount is it crown court ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...