Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Employers Relocating - Is redundancy possible?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

This is my first post on the forum.

 

I am a single father of 2 children (3 & 2). The children live with me fulltime.

 

I am currently employed and work 37.5 hours a week. I have a childminder look after my children while i work.

 

My employer has just announced that they plan to relocate 47 miles away. With the added costs of childcare alone, i simply won't be in a position to survive financially.

 

I have spoken with my employers and they are willing to consider compensating me with an increase in salary, however they have indicated it unlikely.

 

I have been with the company for 4 years. Have i any right to request a redundancy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't request redundancy, redundancy comes about because the job is no longer there:

 

Redundancy is when you dismiss an employee because you no longer:

 

  • carry out the business for which they are employed
  • carry out the business in the place where they are employed
  • require them to carry out work of a particular kind

For a redundancy to be genuine, you must demonstrate that the employee's job will no longer exist.

 

So they could make you redundant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on how the word 'reasonable' is interpreted. Is it reasonable for you to stay where you are and travel, you say not, (cost), would a tribunal consider 47 miles travelling as reasonable.

 

Personally I would say no, it is not reasonable for you to move.

 

Can you not relocate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well its not reasonable considering my circumstances.

 

Is it reasonable for me to relocate? Again considering i am a male raising two young girls, the fact that i am close to my immediate family can not be understated.

 

However, maybe there's nothing i can do? Just become unemployed, look after my children myself, and receive benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel for you, I really do, there's not a lot of satisfaction in living on benefits.

 

Could you not ask for a trial move for say a month to see how you would get on? I know friends and family are very important especially with a couple of girls to bring up. Could you have a chat with them and see what they think.

 

Also, of course, is the reason the company is moving. If it's because money is tight and they are moving into cheaper premises to reduce costs, I would consider a relocation not the best move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A trial move with no compensation is not possible, as i can't afford to pay the additional childcare costs.

 

If they refuse to compensate me, then i simply can't relocate.

 

Would there be nothing in my contract that might offer me some protection here?

 

If they refuse to increase my salary accordingly, and i am forced to go into unemployment, have i any right to ask for some sort of financial package, considering my 4 years service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot depends on how many people are expected to move to this other unit

 

47 miles is unreasonable to travel without any financial assistance. i believe a tribunal would expect up to 30 miles traveling distance as reasonable in this case. the norm is the company would offer some sort of financial arangement say up to three years if you decided to move. milage allowance for instatce as the company would like to hang on to qualified staff and offset the milage against traning costs. the sinario is not guaranteed and is subject to redundancy negotiations

 

your only option would be redundency if you are not prepared to move

 

minimum redundancy pay set by the goverment is £430 for every year but your own employer may be higher in redundancy terms

 

as child care issues are involved the employer by law has to consider flex working practice as well in any redundancy option

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments Millitant.

 

The entire company is moving, which equates to about 20 employees or so.

 

I really don't want to move regardless if i get compensated, but are you saying redundancy is still possible, even if i was, and rejected the offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the company has decided to move then yes, redundancy has to be offered if it is unreasonable for you to travel

 

your company will state the reasons for moving and give you your options

 

work as normal

work under protest

resign and claim constructive dismissal

 

those will be your three options at the end of they day besides taking redundancy

 

how long is it till the move

 

has the consultation period started yet, one 2 one for example

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest there has been no formal proposals made, not sure whether there will be!

 

Following the announcement to staff in the canteen, i waited a week and a half, then spoke with one of the directors.

 

I informed him of my situation and he said he would speak with the other director and come back to me. (Is this technically the one to one consultation?)

 

We have been told they hope to be in new premises by July.

 

Any help or guidance on how i approach this would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are cutting it fine

 

they have to anounce when the consultation period will start has has a minimum 30 day period for 20 staff to anounce redundany

 

A minimum consultation period of 30 days applies where between 20 and 99 employees are potentially affected.

 

you are governed by statute legislation now which the employer cant overide

Edited by millitant
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, as amended by the Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995(10), requires employers to consult about redundancies in circumstances where it is proposed to dismiss 20 or more employees at one establishment over a period of 90 days or less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did mention that you could go redundant in post #2, second bullet point. 100 miles per day isn't reasonable.

 

Take it upon yourself to get the ball rolling, ask them directly what they intend to do with you as you can't relocate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1999, consultation has to be with a trade union where one is recognised, or with other elected representatives of the affected employees where no trade union is recognised. (Employers continue to have a duty to act fairly and reasonably in handling redundancies and informing and consulting affected employees individually, regardless of the number of dismissals)(11). The consultation must take place with a view to reaching agreement with the appropriate representatives and must include discussion about ways of avoiding the redundancies, reducing the numbers to be dismissed and mitigating the consequences of any redundancies. Consultation should be completed before any redundancy notices are issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. Is this what you're referring to? From the ACAS website:

 

Consultation

 

Employers are required to consult with the 'appropriate representatives' of any of the employees who may be affected (directly or indirectly) by the proposed dismissals or by any measures taken in connection with those dismissals.

The consultation should include ways of avoiding the dismissals, reducing the number of employees to be dismissed, and mitigating the effects of dismissals. Consultation must be undertaken by the employer with a view to reaching agreement with appropriate representatives on these issues. This duty applies even when the employees to be made redundant are volunteers. Failure to comply with the consultation requirements could lead to a claim for compensation, known as a protective award.

Consultation should begin in good time and must begin:

 

  • at least 30 days before the first dismissal takes effect if 20 to 99 employees are to be made redundant at one establishment over a period of 90 days or less
  • at least 90 days before the first dismissal takes effect if 100 or more employees are to be made redundant at one establishment over a period of 90 days or less.

 

 

It might be worth giving ACAS a ring if you haven't already.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Having contacted ACAS, i was advised to find out of i had a mobility clause in my contract. I established that there was none.

 

I have now approached the Owners, and asked if they are willing to offer me a redundancy.

 

It is my understanding that the minimum payment is a weeks pay for every years service. I'm sure they will not offer any more, however i know of a friend, who works in a Bank and has been offered a months pay for every years service. Have i any right to try and negotiate a larger payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...