Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Samsung faulty laptop


meaganicole
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I brought a brand new laptop from Comet, it cost me £545 and I use it for University assignments. I only used it for couple of months and some keys are just about to fall off, one of the keys has already fallen off. I took it back to Comet and one of the guys in there told me that the guarantee does not include the keyboard, only hardware. As I'm a computing student, I asked him what his definition of hardware is and he told me, an example of hardware is the internal part of the laptop such as hard drive, RAM, motherboard but not the keyboard. When I asked him to send it back to Samsung to get it repaired, he started to tell me that the Samsung company will charge me for it as the keyboard is not part of hardware. So I asked him, what is the keyboard a part of, he said its a physical equipment.

 

I only used it for couple of months, the laptop is really good, battery life is very decent but if the users' are touch typests then it would not be good for them as the keys can easily come off by itself. The laptop is fine for normal use.

 

What do you guys think of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sales of goods Act states that goods must be fit for purpose and of reasonable quality.

 

It sounds like the keyboard is neither if after 2 months its falling apart. Did you specify what the laptop would be used for prior to purchase - this would then also be covered.

 

Basally Comet should replace the laptop with a new one under Sales of Goods Act - nothing to do with what's hardware and what's not hardware - It is the seller, not the manufacturer, who is responsible if goods do not conform to contract.

 

You have the right to reject the goods with a reasonable time frame

 

take a loot at

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/sogahome/

 

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/fact-sheets/page38311.html

 

Go back to Comet and speak to a manager and demand a new one - if you got a USB keyboard use that so you can use the laptop to make sure you back up your data and remove anything as you might not get a chance to when they replace it.

 

They may then try to offer you a free repair its up to you which you prefer a repair or replacement - don't let Comet push you into a repair if that's not what you want.

Edited by morsy

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I realised is, when I looked very closely at the keyboard, it looks as though the manufacture have used some very cheap material to create the keyboard. The material could have come from poundlands

Link to post
Share on other sites

that just adds to it not being fit for purpose

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought the soga states that the route of resolution is at the retailers discretion?

 

Completely Agree with the above statement. As stated before, the keys were obviously "fit for purpose" when the item was purchased new. Comet havn't intentionally sold you a duff one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose if I manufactured a laptop, I used 'Blue-tack' to keep the keys in place, then sold the laptop and after a few weeks the keys failed, you would say the keys were 'fit for purpose'?

 

Completely Agree with the above statement. As stated before, the keys were obviously "fit for purpose" when the item was purchased new. Comet havn't intentionally sold you a duff one.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Even so, the Consumer can accept / decline the resolution depending on the individual circumstances, it's not finite.

 

Thought the soga states that the route of resolution is at the retailers discretion?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the post, the analogy doesn't fail, 'I suppose if I manufactured a laptop'. To say the following, 'Very rarely do the clips come broken out of the box.'

you are saying that a possibility exists. It's surprising what you can do with 'Blue-tack'. Your making a lot of assumptions, unforetunately, it's not all black and white, lots of grey. 'Don't know what Currys are thinking saying that keyboards aren't covered', sounds pretty straight forward, 'if we had a clue, we ain't telling you'.

 

It wasn't though was it so the analogy fails. If you used blu tack, they wouldn't hold at all. In my experience the keys come off usually when the keyboard is cleaned. Very rarely do the clips come broken out of the box. The key would be loose from day one, and very obvious, clearly this wasn't the case. Having said that, I am sure Samsung would want to have a look and see if they could fix it in the name of customer service. They might only need clipping back on. Don't know what Currys are thinking saying that keyboards aren't covered.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is difficult to say this with 100%, maybe they weren't fixed correctly.

 

Sorry typo, meant comet obviously as the op is talking about comet. The point I am making is that they clearly didn't come faulty out of the box. Comet may have dropped a clanger. Speak to Samsung and see what they say. Unless the op has damed the keys, he will get them fixed. No need for all this comet have to replace the whole laptop, just because a keys come off the keyboard. No retailer would swap a unit over in this example as the cost of replacing the keyboard is minimal.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...