Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

We're going to be evicted... Help please..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening,

Currently I live with my 5 flatmates in London and the last week we received a letter by a mortgage company to inform us the house is going to be repossessed. (In fact the landlord doesn't pay the bank anymore.)

So it seems we need to wait the confirmation from the court to know when we are going to be evicted exactly. Then we should receive the confirmation before the end of June to confirm the exact date when all of them will have to leave the house.

We pay the rent to an agency every month but our deposits are not protected. Moreover the agency is refusing to protect our deposit. So we're afraid to lose the money.

In this context I have some questions so if you could help me that would be very great.

1. Can we stop paying the rent to be sure to get back our deposits from the next month ?

2. Do we need to give 1 month notice to leave the house after the eviction is confirmed by the court ?

3. Do we need to continue for paying the rent after the eviction is confirmed by the court ?

4. It seems we can request an extra time before leaving the house. (2 months) So do we need to request that now or do we need to wait the exact date of the eviction ?

Let me know if you need more information and if you could help me that would be great!

PS: I'm French so apologies for my English which is not perfect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Tell the agent to protect your deposit now. They have until 31st May to comply with the new law under the Localism Act, otherwise you will take them to court and ask the court to award you your deposit back, plus a payment in penalty against them. It's up to you whether you want to pay the rent to the agent or not - but if the house is in the process of being repossessed, you might wish to contact the mortgage company and ask if you can pay the rent directly over to them under the Mortgages Repossession (Protection for Tenants) Act 2010. Under this legislation, if you write to the mortgagee and ask if you can stay, they should allow you a further two month period in the house (you can also apply to the courts to stay if the mortgagee rejects your request, which should be made to the mortgagee in writing).

 

2. No.

 

3. No - you pay only for the time that you are there, but ideally you should pay the money over to the mortgagee, not the LL or the agent.

 

4. You need to do it now - see answer no.1.

 

Votre anglais est bien meilleur que mon français...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lea,

 

Thank you very much for your help.

We have an appointment with the agency next Monday to talk about our situation and deposits.

 

Where can I find more information about the Localism Act please? I tried to google that but that was not very clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last 3 questions please..

 

1. Imagine we request to extend the eviction period of 2 months. Do we need to pay the rent for 2 months even if we leave the house before the end of the 2 months ?

2. How much time will we have to leave the house when we receive the confirmation of the eviction from the court ? IS the same timing every time or does it depend about of each case?

3. Could we get back our deposit immediately when the eviction is confirmed? (Few days at least I suppose) Or do we need to leave the house to get the deposits ?

Edited by BenoitFromLondon
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/part/7/chapter/6/crossheading/tenants-deposits

 

Act is at the above link.

 

1. Yes, you have to pay the rent if you stay in the property. Allowing you to stay will be conditional on you paying.

2. It depends on how busy the court bailiffs are in your area. A possession order granted for 14 days, may not be executed for another three or four weeks in many cases. But it cannot be guaranteed. The bailiffs office at the county court should be able to give you some idea if you ask them directly.

3. If your deposit has been protected it will usually take at least a couple of weeks before it is returned to you. You have to leave the house before the deposit is returned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lea

This is me again...

Both last questions again..

1. Do you know if the lender (The Agency) or the mortgage company who is reposseing the house have to help us to find a new flat/house ?

2. Does the agency have to give back one part of our rent if we pay for one full month and we're evicted the 17th for example? Can we get back the money for the 11 days left ?

Edited by BenoitFromLondon
Link to post
Share on other sites

1. No they don't have to help you find a new property to live in - that is your responsibility.

 

2. If you pay the rent in advance and you are evicted mid-month, then any days thereafter must be repaid to you. If, for example, your monthly rent is £1000, then the daily rate (calculated by multiplying the monthly rent by 12 and dividing that sum by 365 days in the year) is: £32.88. Therefore, if you stayed for 17 days, you would pay £32.88 x 17 days, and would be entitled to - if you leave in June for example, which has 30 days - to 13 x £32.88 in a refund for that month's payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lea !! This is Benoît again !

Just to update you about our situation.

We had an appointment with the agency yesterday.

So the agency is not going to pay the owner anymore so they told us we don't need to pay the rents anymore as well. Except for the bills so we can live in the house until the evictiont. They're going to discuss between them about the deposit to know if we can get back the money when the eviction is confirmed. (Because the situation is exceptional and some of us are not able to pay the deposit and the 1st rent for a new house/room)

In fact the agency is clearly not clean. We shouldn't be 6 in the house but 4 only.. Moreover the contract for the house is not a "to-let" contract but it's a contract for a family. (I don't remeber exactly the good term). So that means the agency shouldn't rent the house for sharing. It's why we're thinking they try to be very kind with us because we could request the court easily to fix the problem. In this context, we should be able to save 1 or 2 rents and to get back our deposit. (Good news)

 

BUT (because there is a but everytime)... My flatmates and I understood the agency had to request an extension period for the eviction (2 months) when we received the first letter of eviction. That should be done in 2 weeks after receiving of the 1st notification. But the agency is telling us the extension needs to be done when the eviction is confirmed by the court because it's a residiential house. Is the agency telling the truth ??

Because that could be a very bad news for us if we cannot ask an extension anymore..

Thank you very much for your help by advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you contact the mortgage company directly yourselves and not rely on the agent. The agent was working for the landlord, and therefore his view could be biased, and also not with your best interests in mind.

 

If you contact the mortgage company, you should be able to gain some additional time in the house. The fact that the property was rented out and not to a family is immaterial at this stage; it simply won't make a difference. The mortgagee has repossessed and they don't care now who is living in the property, they just want to get the property sold to recoup their money.

 

You might wish to try suing the landlord in the small claims court for the return of your deposit if it is not returned to you - but really, he hasn't paid his mortgage, so the likelihood of you being able to get your money back is virtually nil. If you haven't paid the rent recently, consider that the return of your deposit instead.

 

The agency cannot request anything from the courts or the mortgagee on behalf of the tenants. YOU have to contact the mortgagee and/or the courts yourself in order to do this. The agency are effectively stalling you - the eviction can be stayed by the occupants of the house, but only if they put in an application to the courts to do so (using form N244) - however, you MUST write to the mortgagee first as advised in earlier posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...