Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone Problem please help!! ***awaiting update from OP***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Typical corporate answers that I expected!!

 

If Lee was allowed to speak freely I would think the answers would be slightly different but at the end of the day, Lee doesn't want to lose his job.

 

It may well be corporate speak but just by looking at the amount of threads that Lee has had some (if not all) dealings with speaks volumes (pro for Lee and less so for VF.

What I would like to see is VF recording ALL phone calls and storing them for as long as necessary and to instruct the customer service staff to note everything down on the customer records.

While I have no proof, my gut says that some VF staff answer the phone, speak platitudes and do nothing.

 

While this forum will take any company to task and say things that may be uncomfortable for them, the last thing we want them to do is remove themselves from a forum where they have shown how seriously they take complaints (Lee not so much VF as a whole)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Lee was allowed to speak freely I would think the answers would be slightly different but at the end of the day, Lee doesn't want to lose his job.

 

It may well be corporate speak but just by looking at the amount of threads that Lee has had some (if not all) dealings with speaks volumes (pro for Lee and less so for VF.

What I would like to see is VF recording ALL phone calls and storing them for as long as necessary and to instruct the customer service staff to note everything down on the customer records.

While I have no proof, my gut says that some VF staff answer the phone, speak platitudes and do nothing.

 

While this forum will take any company to task and say things that may be uncomfortable for them, the last thing we want them to do is remove themselves from a forum where they have shown how seriously they take complaints (Lee not so much VF as a whole)

 

I completely agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I can understand how things appear I can assure you that recording a default isn't a course of action taken lightly by us. However, it does become necessary when our records indicate that a customer hasn't been in contact with us to discuss the arrears on their account for a significant amount of time.

 

There have of course been a few instances where situations haven't been handled as we would've liked; however, these can be rectified where we have records to show that the customer made proactive attempts to resolve matters with us.

 

 

Are you sure about that?

 

I suspect that you really need to have made sure that the customer knows all about this first, probably even if they have moved house

 

I think that you should also be ensuring that any amount is legally enforceable and not present because of unfair contractual provisions

 

I am sure that I must have mid-understood your tone of typing, because that really does look to me as though you use the registering of defaults as a method of debt collection or tracing customers ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

At last an update, only taken over seven months for VF to actually agree to the outstanding amount that they first sent me back in January. So all this time they have provided me with a default on my credit file and I'm now being told that if I pay the outstanding amount the account can be closed and then the default removed. This default, which, was wrongly entered onto my credit file can only be removed once I've paid the outstanding amount , this I've been told by Lee today is an act of goodwill by Vodafone!!!!!! WTF.

If VF had got their act together in January/February when I explained by phone,email etc that I had received a letter stating an outstanding amount and termination fee totalling £124.79 and that I wanted an invoice to pay this and close the account. Then VF wouldn't of wasted so many man hours on my account and more importantly end up having such an adverse effect on my credit file. Then try to palm me off by saying their decision was an act of goodwill. As far as I'm concerned their actions beggar belief.

I await your replies on how a company as big as VF want me to act with goodwill when they have shown yet again that they treat their customers with such contempt!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...