Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employers BACS Error / Account Suspended


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Basically my employer paid in £1500 in February to a Halifax account that was seriously overdrawn.

 

In December 2011, I had informed my employer that further payments should go into a different (Natwest) account (and details provided).

 

Now, in January 2012, the payment went into the new and correct (Natwest) account. By this point Halifax had started to send me Debt Collection Letters on the overdrawn account/ default notices etc etc.

 

However, my employer changed their payroll system and when it came to the February 2012 payment, they had used the old Halifax account details to pay my wages into due to an oversight in the HR Dept. As the account was in default, and overdrawn, the account obviously swallowed the payment, and as Halifax had withdrawn my account access anyway, the money was as good as lost.

 

I informed my employer that they had paid into the wrong account due to an error on their part, and they agreed to make another payment to the correct account, which they did.

 

It now appears that they have been unable to reverse payment to the Halifax account and are my employer is coming after me for the duplicate payment.

 

What advice can you give me here? Am I liable for reimbursing my employer for their mistake? Does Halifax have to reverse a payment made in error?

 

Thanks guys.

 

(Incidentally, if anyone knows whether the £500 odd in unplanned overdraft charges made by Halifax is legal or not I'd be grateful to hear. £5 per day for being overdrawn).

Edited by firstclassx
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just spotted this, so don't know if it's resolved now.

 

BACS payments can't usually be reversed unless claimed back very quickly, for example on the same day. I take it this didn't happen.

 

Where are you now on this?

 

Did the payment clear the overdraft to Halifax?

 

Are your employers asking for all of this at once, or over a period of time?

 

Regarding the bank charges, personally I'd say they aren't legal, but this is still to be proved in court. I wouldn't suggest that you try and claim them at the moment, unless you were to try on the grounds of hardship but this could be a bit of a long shot.

 

I'll move your thread to the employment forum where you may get more informed assistance on your employers erroneous actions.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting - forget the halifax account for the time being.....

 

i) you notified your employer of the change of details. The new details were used successfully on one occasion.

 

ii) the employer err'd and paid funds to the incorrect account the following month. They remedied this by making a further payment to the correct account.

 

iii) the correct action is for the employer to seek the monies back from the halifax as this was paid in error. The difficulty is you are the account holder and halifax have no intention of returning the money as this will create a od situation that is not currently being addressed.

 

iv) The company could not affect a BACS recall due to time lapsed, with the BACS payment system the receiving account is credited 3 days after the funds have left the sender - this is the time period that a recall from the originator can be issued, effectively the receiver will see both a credit and debit on the same date. Note this does not apply to FPS also part of BACS, as the funds are deemed received when sent (usually within 2 hrs).

 

v) a solution could be the company treat the second payment to you as a loan, and this is repaid over a set period, ie 6 months. This would be amicable as the employer caused the issue in the first place. The fact that you have no access to the funds @halifax is irrelevant and none of the employers business the reasons behind this. Technically they should as above seek redress to halifax and treat as a supplier mispaid.

 

vi) Yes you are liable, however your employer could be sympathetic as above or go for broke. You could mitigate some reduction for inconvience or the full sum would be due.

 

From direct dot gov.

Rules for making deductions from your pay

 

Your employer is not allowed to make a deduction from your pay or wages unless:

 

 

  • it is required or allowed by law, for example National Insurance, income tax or student loan repayments
  • you agree in writing to a deduction
  • your contract of employment says they can
  • it is a result of any statutory disciplinary proceedings
  • there is a statutory payment due to a public authority
  • you have not worked due to taking part in a strike or industrial action
  • it is to recover an earlier overpayment of wages or expenses
  • it is a result of a court order or Employment Tribunal decision

A deduction must not reduce your pay below the National Minimum Wage rate (except a limited amount for accommodation). This applies even if you have given your permission for it.

If you were overpaid in error, instead of making a deduction, your employer may try to recover the overpayment by making an application for a court order. For more information about how and when you might be able to prevent your employer from taking back an overpayment, you should speak to one of the following:

 

  • a solicitor
  • an Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) adviser
  • a Citizens Advice Bureau adviser

If this applies -

 

Retail work: extra protection from deductions

 

If you work in retail (such as a shop or restaurant) you have extra protection against deductions from your wages. If there is a shortfall in the till or stock shortage, your employer is not allowed to take more than 10 per cent of your gross wages for a pay period. If the 10 per cent isn't enough then your employer can continue to take money from your wages on subsequent paydays. However never more than 10 per cent at a time.

An example

 

There is a shortfall of £50 in the till. Your employer wants to deduct this from your earnings. You are paid £250 per week before any deductions for tax or National Insurance etc (£250 gross pay).

Your employer can take ten per cent of your gross earnings. They must only take £25 one week and then make another deduction from your next pay cheque for £25.

If you leave your job, your employer can take the full amount owed from your final pay.

 

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for the responses.

 

The payment cleared my unauthorised overdraft, but still left me overdrawn by £100 or so, although no bank penalties/charges apply unless I exceed £250 so this isn't too bad really. I've since stopped using the account and they've not contacted me for a while.

 

My employer isn't being very specific over this, simply stating that it needs to be "recovered" ASAP.

 

I was considering writing a grievance against the Finance Dept for the distress caused by this, and then suggesting that I repay a nominal amount each week, so that it is paid off over the course of 1 year as my financial situation is delicate.

 

Would I be able to charge my employers, or seek a reduction in amount owed, for the additional administrative work I have done, like pleading with Halifax to return the funds etc?

 

Incidentally, if they insist on taking more than I can afford per week/pay period etc, can I refuse to pay and seek a court order which will take into account my circumstances and ability to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for the responses.

 

The payment cleared my unauthorised overdraft, but still left me overdrawn by £100 or so, although no bank penalties/charges apply unless I exceed £250 so this isn't too bad really. I've since stopped using the account and they've not contacted me for a while.

 

- this good news in some respect - no charges and hassle

 

My employer isn't being very specific over this, simply stating that it needs to be "recovered" ASAP.

 

I was considering writing a grievance against the Finance Dept for the distress caused by this, and then suggesting that I repay a nominal amount each week, so that it is paid off over the course of 1 year as my financial situation is delicate.

 

- i would suggest an informal approach first ' hey you paid into the wrong account, so its your fault, but i can afford to pay x for y weeks ????'

 

Would I be able to charge my employers, or seek a reduction in amount owed, for the additional administrative work I have done, like pleading with Halifax to return the funds etc? - see how they take the offer of x per week first, they do pay your wages and employ you so the situation is delicate.

 

Incidentally, if they insist on taking more than I can afford per week/pay period etc, can I refuse to pay and seek a court order which will take into account my circumstances and ability to pay?

 

- no, but unless you agree to it or is in your contract terms, they cannot deduct - unfair deduction from wages and refer to ET

 

Remember they can themselves issue proceedings for recovery, clearly this would totally ruin the relationship.

 

However, going on the facts, they caused this, and IMHO they should accept the terms you are offering!

 

N

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to clarify one small point on the above

 

From direct dot gov.

Rules for making deductions from your pay

 

A deduction must not reduce your pay below the National Minimum Wage rate

 

I know that direct.gov say the above quote here http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Employees/Pay/DG_175878,

 

But I just wanted to point out that we looked at this a while ago here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?296236-100-wage-deduction-IS-THIS-LEGAL

 

and I am 99.9% sure they can make a deduction that could APPEAR to leave you with below the NMW.

 

Allow me to explain. You are paid monthly, and your ER pays you twice in January, once to Halifax and once to Natwest. Being unable to recover from the bank in Feb they pay you nowt.

 

Now it appears that you are paid below NMW for Feb BUT, I reckon your ER can argue that for the purposes of the deduction the pay reference period is 2 months and in that 2 months you have had 2 months paid even after the deduction.

 

Thus potentially an ER can deduct 100% of wages to recover a previous 100% overpayment.

 

Just wanted to make that one point alone and also say I think direct.gov can oversimplify things sometimes

 

Hope this is some help.

 

Che

  • Haha 1

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

....Thus potentially an ER can deduct 100% of wages to recover a previous 100% overpayment.

 

 

 

Che

 

OMG - Shocking but true...

 

OP- I assume you have payslips with consequative (damn spelling) pay periods ??? with no deductions ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to clarify one small point on the above

 

 

 

I know that direct.gov say the above quote here http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Employees/Pay/DG_175878,

 

But I just wanted to point out that we looked at this a while ago here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?296236-100-wage-deduction-IS-THIS-LEGAL

 

and I am 99.9% sure they can make a deduction that could APPEAR to leave you with below the NMW.

 

Allow me to explain. You are paid monthly, and your ER pays you twice in January, once to Halifax and once to Natwest. Being unable to recover from the bank in Feb they pay you nowt.

 

Now it appears that you are paid below NMW for Feb BUT, I reckon your ER can argue that for the purposes of the deduction the pay reference period is 2 months and in that 2 months you have had 2 months paid even after the deduction.

 

Thus potentially an ER can deduct 100% of wages to recover a previous 100% overpayment.

 

Just wanted to make that one point alone and also say I think direct.gov can oversimplify things sometimes

 

Hope this is some help.

 

Che

 

Absolutely true. The starting point with deductions and salary overpayments is that the payment has already been made, so the deduction will leave the employee in the same position ie having earned above the NMW. An employer can, in theory at least, leave an employee with zero wages for the month by deduction 100% of a previous overpayment, hence why there should be some dialogue beforehand to try and prevent that!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't the fact that it was the employers error make any difference?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't the fact that it was the employers error make any difference?

 

Now that is the 64 dollar question and something I'm really not sure about. Thus, I limited my comments to the NMW part.

 

Che didn't want to look stoooopid :wink:. I reckon you might need a good source of info like Harveys or Lexis to get a definitive answer ..... but I'm not 100% sure on this part of this problem....hmmmm

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough Che! :lol:

 

Hi Thanks for the responses.

 

The payment cleared my unauthorised overdraft, but still left me overdrawn by £100 or so, although no bank penalties/charges apply unless I exceed £250 so this isn't too bad really. I've since stopped using the account and they've not contacted me for a while.

 

My employer isn't being very specific over this, simply stating that it needs to be "recovered" ASAP.

 

I was considering writing a grievance against the Finance Dept for the distress caused by this, and then suggesting that I repay a nominal amount each week, so that it is paid off over the course of 1 year as my financial situation is delicate.

 

Would I be able to charge my employers, or seek a reduction in amount owed, for the additional administrative work I have done, like pleading with Halifax to return the funds etc?

 

Incidentally, if they insist on taking more than I can afford per week/pay period etc, can I refuse to pay and seek a court order which will take into account my circumstances and ability to pay?

 

I think if it was me I'd just try and negotiate this amicably to begin with and see how you get on. Make them an offer that you can afford, and if they accept it then great. At least it's saving interest building up on the unauthorised OD, although if you have more urgent or priority debts that's not ideal.

 

If that doesn't work out then consider taking it higher and perhaps, if necessary, taking out a grievance.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi again guys,

 

Update to this, I offered to pay £30 a week over a period of 1 year to cover the mis-payment, which would cover the entire amount. This works out £120 per 4 weekly pay cycle.

 

They refused this and have stated they will deduct £1500 from me in next weeks pay, which leads me with nothing at all for next month.

 

Planning to submit a grievance, but I guess there's nothing I can do to stop them making the deduction?

 

I'm also thinking about going down the Data Protection Act route, for them failing to keep accurate information on me, and retaining expired information and using it without authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would argue that you haven't been overpaid.

 

A scenario for you:

If the employer had made a one digit mistake with the account number and paid the salary into a random suspended account, which also happened to be overdrawn, and the recipient bank had refused to refund the money, would the employer hold YOU liable for the money ?

 

This is what has happened to you, the only difference is the random account is in your name.

 

The employer can't state that you have had the benefit of the money by repaying a debt of yours, they don't know what your intentions are towards that debt and it's none of their business.

 

The employer made a mistake. They have already paid into the new account so the old account details should not have been retained. Threaten them with the DPA and ICO.

 

They will have to ask the bank to refund the money. If the bank think it was your salary they won't refund it. The employer should have said it was a different employees salary paid into the wrong account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would argue that you haven't been overpaid.

 

A scenario for you:

If the employer had made a one digit mistake with the account number and paid the salary into a random suspended account, which also happened to be overdrawn, and the recipient bank had refused to refund the money, would the employer hold YOU liable for the money ?

 

This is what has happened to you, the only difference is the random account is in your name.

 

The employer can't state that you have had the benefit of the money by repaying a debt of yours, they don't know what your intentions are towards that debt and it's none of their business.

 

The employer made a mistake. They have already paid into the new account so the old account details should not have been retained. Threaten them with the DPA and ICO.

 

They will have to ask the bank to refund the money. If the bank think it was your salary they won't refund it. The employer should have said it was a different employees salary paid into the wrong account.

 

I have written to my employer and reminded them that as per Section 13(1), 13(2) of the Data Protection Act 1998, compensation can be awarded for failure to comply with certain requirements of the Data Protection Act, in cases where it has caused distress or damage.

 

It has caused me stress and damage IMO.

 

I am prepared to pay £30 pw over a 1 year period. If they choose to deduct the full amount next week, I'll have to take action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...