Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

E-petitions - please sign - Bailiffs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After reading of the criminal behaviour of Certificated Bailiffs and HCEOs, DVLA oblivious to the law-breaking of their enforcement contractor and police inaction on CAG and LB, I have decided to take a stand and set up two e-petitions at Direct Gov.

 

One of my e-petitions is to require the police to treat bailiff and HCEO misconduct as crime, which is what it is, not civil matters, and that bailiff/HCEO powers form an integral part of police training. The link for this is : -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31752

 

 

The other e-petition is to terminate the contract of the DVLA's private sector enforcement contractor who has been repeatedly clamping and impounding vehicles in breach of the applicable legislation. The e-petition also calls on the government to return enforcement to the DVLA itself using directly-employed staff, not private sector contractors. The reason for this is because when DVLA had enforcement in-house, any mistakes were rectified quickly and DVLA officers apologised. This is not happening with private sector contractors. What you get with them are threats, refusals to identify themselves and claims they can clamp and seize vehicles, even though the law clearly says they cannot. The link for this is : -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31748

 

 

In addition to my bailiff e-petition, another e-petition to crack down on bailiff misconduct has been set up by Eric Randall. The link for this is: -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/21095

 

 

Would you please sign these e-petitions and encourage as many people as possible to sign them, too. There is strength in numbers and once the signature tally on an e-petition hits the 100,000 mark, this triggers a debate in the House of Commons.

 

Things can change for the better and by encouraging people to stand up to these bullies, change will come about. The only thing stopping change taking place is apathy. Be positive, be strong and stand up for what is right.

 

Thank you all for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've signed the two bailiff petitions, but get this error: "Whoops! It looks like you tried to access a page that is no longer available, sorry about that.", when trying to find he DVLA petition. Do you have another link or a title for the petition please?

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've signed the two bailiff petitions, but get this error: "Whoops! It looks like you tried to access a page that is no longer available, sorry about that.", when trying to find he DVLA petition. Do you have another link or a title for the petition please?

 

It can be temperamental at times. If you go to epetitions.direct.gov.uk and enter DVLA into the search engine, the petition is entitled "Termination of DVLA Contractor's Contract".

 

Thank you for signing the two bailiff e-petitions. Bailiff and HCEO misconduct is getting out of control, as posts on CAG, LB and Bailiff Advice Online have shown. The sooner the law is tightened and the police crack down on it, instead of being complicit, the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Links replaced and hopefully will continue to work :)

 

 

One of my e-petitions is to require the police to treat bailiff and HCEO misconduct as crime, which is what it is, not civil matters, and that bailiff/HCEO powers form an integral part of police training. The link for this is : -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31752

 

 

The other e-petition is to terminate the contract of the DVLA's private sector enforcement contractor who has been repeatedly clamping and impounding vehicles in breach of the applicable legislation. The e-petition also calls on the government to return enforcement to the DVLA itself using directly-employed staff, not private sector contractors. The reason for this is because when DVLA had enforcement in-house, any mistakes were rectified quickly and DVLA officers apologised. This is not happening with private sector contractors. What you get with them are threats, refusals to identify themselves and claims they can clamp and seize vehicles, even though the law clearly says they cannot. The link for this is : -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31748

 

 

In addition to my bailiff e-petition, another e-petition to crack down on bailiff misconduct has been set up by Eric Randall. The link for this is: -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/21095

 

 

Would you please sign these e-petitions and encourage as many people as possible to sign them, too. There is strength in numbers and once the signature tally on an e-petition hits the 100,000 mark, this triggers a debate in the House of Commons.

 

Things can change for the better and by encouraging people to stand up to these bullies, change will come about. The only thing stopping change taking place is apathy. Be positive, be strong and stand up for what is right.

 

Thank you all for your support.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi that is fantastic, i will be signing all 3, i have a meeting with our local press this week, i really want to stand up and be heard so i will tell them this info and im meeting up with a rep for our local mp next week both the press and mp recieve calls daily about the terrible way bailiffs have acted so lets hope we can get as many signatures as possible!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi old bill what an excellent idea both bailiff/HCEO petitions signed although it won't solve peoples immediate problems hopefully it will make a difference in the long run and takes very little time to do.

 

Hope all on here sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading of the criminal behaviour of Certificated Bailiffs and HCEOs, DVLA oblivious to the law-breaking of their enforcement contractor and police inaction on CAG and LB, I have decided to take a stand and set up two e-petitions at Direct Gov.

 

One of my e-petitions is to require the police to treat bailiff and HCEO misconduct as crime, which is what it is, not civil matters, and that bailiff/HCEO powers form an integral part of police training. The link for this is : -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31752

 

 

The other e-petition is to terminate the contract of the DVLA's private sector enforcement contractor who has been repeatedly clamping and impounding vehicles in breach of the applicable legislation. The e-petition also calls on the government to return enforcement to the DVLA itself using directly-employed staff, not private sector contractors. The reason for this is because when DVLA had enforcement in-house, any mistakes were rectified quickly and DVLA officers apologised. This is not happening with private sector contractors. What you get with them are threats, refusals to identify themselves and claims they can clamp and seize vehicles, even though the law clearly says they cannot. The link for this is : -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31748

 

 

In addition to my bailiff e-petition, another e-petition to crack down on bailiff misconduct has been set up by Eric Randall. The link for this is: -

 

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/21095

 

 

Would you please sign these e-petitions and encourage as many people as possible to sign them, too. There is strength in numbers and once the signature tally on an e-petition hits the 100,000 mark, this triggers a debate in the House of Commons.

 

Things can change for the better and by encouraging people to stand up to these bullies, change will come about. The only thing stopping change taking place is apathy. Be positive, be strong and stand up for what is right.

 

Thank you all for your support.

 

All duly signed OB would suggest same post in each forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done and done

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

all signed hope you get the signatures you need as I have been on the receiving end of these bullies, for something that was not even my problem but they told me as his family it was my problem. good luck

 

If you start a new thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=168 you could let us help & see if there is any room for getting back any unlawful charges.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...