Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Turn casual moments into unforgettable dates – choose the best casual dating site! Actual Girls [URL=https://matchnow.life]Super casual Dating[/URL]
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Seriously vulnerable family bullied for over 5hrs by bailiffs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 839
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm an ex employee. That's how I know a bit about them.

 

Ah, thought you sounded quite knowledgable. I cannot believe the lies we have been fed about this whole affair. I am not at all a naive person, I have good grasp on how the world works, yet, still I am shocked tat the council mislead us in this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a star, this is amazing info. The police lady was great, I did not blame her at all for believing the bailiffs at first, they are very convincing. I cannot believe that they used her in this way and threatened her livelihood. At the end of the day she was just doing her job and get rid of the uniform and you have got a wife and mother (and a dog owner btw) who has bills to pay and a mortgage to keep on top of, it actually angers me immensely that they could show such disregard for another human being. If she had taken them at their word without checking, she would have been lucky to have landed a job as a security guard at the local shopping centre. Shameless!

 

I doubt she would have been able to get a job as a security guard if she had been convicted of Burglary. A criminal conviction is a bar to employment as a security guard. You are right about police officers being ordinary men and women - and dog owners - once the uniform is taken off. Police work is a dangerous job - I've done it. I'm afraid the reality is, certificated bailiffs and HCEOs are Rent-A-Thugs - there is no other term to describe them, other than **** or scumbags, which is what I and my colleagues used to call them when we caught them acting illegally or bullying the sick, elderly or vulnerable.

 

One other offence that could be levelled at the bailiffs, Ross and Roberts, its management and, possibly, its parent Capita, is that of Fraud by False Misrepresentation (Section 2, Fraud Act 2006) by saying they could seize your daughter's car when they had no right or power in law to do so. In order to clobber Ross and Roberts and, possibly, Capita, Section 12 of the Act contains a provision that enables companies, their directors, company secretaries, company officers and managers to be held liable, criminally, for any offences, under Section 2, committed in the company's name, whether they knew it was going on or not. This could be useful in dealing with Ross and Robert, as if the directors were to be successfully convicted, it results in an automatic lifetime ban from acting as a company director, subject to any appeal against conviction. The certificated bailiffs would lose their certification and forfeit their bonds if convicted, though, if a County Court judge gets to hear of the way they have treated you, I cannot see them holding onto their certificates. A learned associate informs me that judges do not like bullying or harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They play on people not having knowledge. I was to soft to work for them. I put money on peoples gas and electric meters, instead of taking money of them...... I seriously have done. I've also have taken clothes gone to small for my kids and toys back to clients.... my advice to people was to leave Windows and doors locked and ignore.... park the cars at relatives and friends..... it will go back to council eventually.....

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They play on people not having knowledge. I was to soft to work for them. I put money on peoples gas and electric meters, instead of taking money of them...... I seriously have done. I've also have taken clothes gone to small for my kids and toys back to clients.... my advice to people was to leave Windows and doors locked and ignore.... park the cars at relatives and friends..... it will go back to council eventually.....

 

Clearly, you are somebody with a conscience, Jimjim. The vast majority of bailiffs I have had the misfortune to deal with appear to have had conscience by-passes or sold their souls to the Devil. Let your light shine and shine bright, Jimjim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think being a woman with small kids, I could see the other side. 90% of the cases were wrong and shouldn't be collected on. Id rather get it sorted than force people to pay something they never owed in the first place.

 

It's crazy and I used to ring the councils from the property and tell them it was wrong. It used to make me sick, what people were expected to put people through.

 

I know when they were selling up a lot of staff left as they did not want to be associated with equita. They didn't like the ways. They were the guys with morals and operated a lot like me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt she would have been able to get a job as a security guard if she had been convicted of Burglary. A criminal conviction is a bar to employment as a security guard. You are right about police officers being ordinary men and women - and dog owners - once the uniform is taken off. Police work is a dangerous job - I've done it. I'm afraid the reality is, certificated bailiffs and HCEOs are Rent-A-Thugs - there is no other term to describe them, other than **** or scumbags, which is what I and my colleagues used to call them when we caught them acting illegally or bullying the sick, elderly or vulnerable.

 

One other offence that could be levelled at the bailiffs, Ross and Roberts, its management and, possibly, its parent Capita, is that of Fraud by False Misrepresentation (Section 2, Fraud Act 2006) by saying they could seize your daughter's car when they had no right or power in law to do so. In order to clobber Ross and Roberts and, possibly, Capita, Section 12 of the Act contains a provision that enables companies, their directors, company secretaries, company officers and managers to be held liable, criminally, for any offences, under Section 2, committed in the company's name, whether they knew it was going on or not. This could be useful in dealing with Ross and Robert, as if the directors were to be successfully convicted, it results in an automatic lifetime ban from acting as a company director, subject to any appeal against conviction. The certificated bailiffs would lose their certification and forfeit their bonds if convicted, though, if a County Court judge gets to hear of the way they have treated you, I cannot see them holding onto their certificates. A learned associate informs me that judges do not like bullying or harassment.

 

That's great info and I can assure you that my family and I do intend to take this as far as we can. I must admit I have never really dealt with a judge, my husband did jury service a couple of years ago but that's about as far as our experience goes, so it's good to know about their feelings on this issue. I have heard that many countries have outlawed bailiffs due to the fact that in most cases their fees were so much more than the original debt, however after watching the budget on tv today, I dont think that the powers that be will be getting rid of this **** any time soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think being a woman with small kids, I could see the other side. 90% of the cases were wrong and shouldn't be collected on. Id rather get it sorted than force people to pay something they never owed in the first place.

 

It's crazy and I used to ring the councils from the property and tell them it was wrong. It used to make me sick, what people were expected to put people through.

 

I know when they were selling up a lot of staff left as they did not want to be associated with equita. They didn't like the ways. They were the guys with morals and operated a lot like me.

 

Bless you. Bet you didn't last long as a bailiff though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With reference to being mislead by your local authority, speak to the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) regarding lodging a formal complaint.

 

unfortunately, old bill, there needs to be a correct procedure before it gets to the LGO stage. formal complaints have to be made first,once it gets to the CEO stage and you still are not happy with the out come, then you can involve the LGO.

 

Personally, i would get the complaint as far as possible then get a form 4 sent off to the court where the bailiff was certificated. If the police are willing to stand as witness for you then you have a good chance of getting this bailiff's certificate revoked and a possible payment from his/her bond. Are you sure the second bailiff was not certificated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I did try to avoid getting ill, but it's just those doggone genes of mine........

 

I think I know what happened, hunni. When they were dishing out genes you thought they said jeans and asked for nice blue ones ... :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately, old bill, there needs to be a correct procedure before it gets to the LGO stage. formal complaints have to be made first,once it gets to the CEO stage and you still are not happy with the out come, then you can involve the LGO.

 

Personally, i would get the complaint as far as possible then get a form 4 sent off to the court where the bailiff was certificated. If the police are willing to stand as witness for you then you have a good chance of getting this bailiff's certificate revoked and a possible payment from his/her bond. Are you sure the second bailiff was not certificated.

 

Whilst I agree with what you say in respect of the LGO, the criminal conduct of the bailiffs involved in this case overshadows misrepresentation of authority. The fact that they compromised a Police Sergeant's position in a way that could have cost that officer her job and, possibly, her liberty, too, referral of the matter by the police to the CPS for direction is, in my honest opinion, a must. Be in no doubt, if the CPS decide prosecution is justified, the comedian who damaged OP's daughter's car will be made to pay for the damage out of their own pocket or Ross and Roberts will have to pay for it. The bailiff who undermined the police officers and made threats, etc., will lose their certificate in any case, whether it goes down the Form 4 route or the criminal route. Do not forget that a criminal conviction against a bailiff means they are deemed not a fit and proper person to act as a bailiff and will forfeit their bond. The courts can order them to pay compensation/damages on top of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately, old bill, there needs to be a correct procedure before it gets to the LGO stage. formal complaints have to be made first,once it gets to the CEO stage and you still are not happy with the out come, then you can involve the LGO.

 

Personally, i would get the complaint as far as possible then get a form 4 sent off to the court where the bailiff was certificated. If the police are willing to stand as witness for you then you have a good chance of getting this bailiff's certificate revoked and a possible payment from his/her bond. Are you sure the second bailiff was not certificated.

 

Pretty sure. I know that the company aren't exactly going to volunteer that information, however I will do my best to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I know what happened, hunni. When they were dishing out genes you thought they said jeans and asked for nice blue ones ... :razz:

 

Possibly, I am a bit of a Malteser, brown on the outside and blonde in the middle...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree with what you say in respect of the LGO, the criminal conduct of the bailiffs involved in this case overshadows misrepresentation of authority. The fact that they compromised a Police Sergeant's position in a way that could have cost that officer her job and, possibly, her liberty, too, referral of the matter by the police to the CPS for direction is, in my honest opinion, a must. Be in no doubt, if the CPS decide prosecution is justified, the comedian who damaged OP's daughter's car will be made to pay for the damage out of their own pocket or Ross and Roberts will have to pay for it. The bailiff who undermined the police officers and made threats, etc., will lose their certificate in any case, whether it goes down the Form 4 route or the criminal route. Do not forget that a criminal conviction against a bailiff means they are deemed not a fit and proper person to act as a bailiff and will forfeit their bond. The courts can order them to pay compensation/damages on top of that.

The problem will be persuading the police to act, and the council to fess up to the wrongful actios of their agents Ross 'n Robbers and Capita fopr which thy are 100% liable. Also the Form 4 route if it goes pear shaped can end up with the complainant paying costs. Outlawla has been having problems trying to get a council to take him seriously, there it seemds the police are almost in cahoots with the counciland baikliffs and will do nothing.

 

Annette1973 I think you should complain and send in Formal complaints marked as such to all including your MP as has been mentioned previously, and there is merit in following old bill's suggestions, as if you can get the police to take this one on, it may well be a milestone in the fight against these scumbags and their ilk. you have been getting some great advice imho

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree with what you say in respect of the LGO, the criminal conduct of the bailiffs involved in this case overshadows misrepresentation of authority. The fact that they compromised a Police Sergeant's position in a way that could have cost that officer her job and, possibly, her liberty, too, referral of the matter by the police to the CPS for direction is, in my honest opinion, a must. Be in no doubt, if the CPS decide prosecution is justified, the comedian who damaged OP's daughter's car will be made to pay for the damage out of their own pocket or Ross and Roberts will have to pay for it. The bailiff who undermined the police officers and made threats, etc., will lose their certificate in any case, whether it goes down the Form 4 route or the criminal route. Do not forget that a criminal conviction against a bailiff means they are deemed not a fit and proper person to act as a bailiff and will forfeit their bond. The courts can order them to pay compensation/damages on top of that.

 

I totally agree with every thing you are saying old bill, and i wish it could work out that way, unfortunately it doesnt. But times are changing, lets hope it will start looking favourable for the debtor, where bailiffs will be prosecuted for stepping out of line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem will be persuading the police to act, and the council to fess up to the wrongful actios of their agents Ross 'n Robbers and Capita fopr which thy are 100% liable. Also the Form 4 route if it goes pear shaped can end up with the complainant paying costs. Outlawla has been having problems trying to get a council to take him seriously, there it seemds the police are almost in cahoots with the counciland baikliffs and will do nothing.

 

Annette1973 I think you should complain and send in Formal complaints marked as such to all including your MP as has been mentioned previously, and there is merit in following old bill's suggestions, as if you can get the police to take this one on, it may well be a milestone in the fight against these scumbags and their ilk. you have been getting some great advice imho

 

Thank you for that. I have already sent a preliminary email to the Chief Exec and the Head if Revenues at the Council. I have also sent enquiries to the issuing courts regarding the Liability Orders and Bailiff Certification. I will today send my Formal Complaints via Royal Mail Recorded. I feel that with all the advice I have had from all you good people has helped and supported me enough to now take this to the next level. I went to see my Dr last night and they have postponed an exploratory operation which could have meant a much better qualiy of life for me. The operation is quite risky, however it would have helped the Drs to decide if I need a liver transplant or not. Now I don't know when they will do it. The reason they have postponed is due to high blood pressure, wonder how that happened, my life is so totally stress free, lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, yesterday I sent an email to the Chief Exec at the council outlining the events and my concerns and informing them that I intend to make a formal complaint. This morning I received this in reply.

 

 

Dear Mr & Mrs xxxxxxxxxx

 

Dave Xxxxx, the Chief Executive, has asked me to investigate this matter on his behalf.

 

We are treating the matter as a formal complaint, in accordance with the Council's complaint procedure, and will respond as soon as possible.

 

Full details of our complaints procedure is available on the Council's website

 

 

Regards, Xxxxxx

 

Xxxxxx xxxxx

Head of Customer & Financial Services

Edited by Annette1973
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was quite amusing, if my Dr had seen me he would have had me sectioned. P J's, dressing gown, slippers, wild hair, no makeup and looking a lovely shade of Margery Simpson yellow...

 

The Skin pigmentation thing due to your liver problems?

 

I would suggest that with such a visual indicator of health problems, that it was also extremely clear to the Bailiff's the moment you opened the door, that you are unwell, and vulnerable. Maybe put this in the complaints.

 

I would consider contacting the press too, national as well as local. The Council and Ross and Robbers will not look very good, harrassing and intimidating something with severe medical problems, who's condition is obvious, lying to Police etc.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...