Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Who do I sue?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My 3 month window in which I can take my ex employer to a tribunal is almost up and no redundancy payment has come through yet, The administrator tells me it should of been paid by now and the redundancy payment service say they are investigating the redundancy payments as they think a transfer has been done meaning sham redundancies.

 

So who do I sue saying the old company is now insolvent? Or how do I go about this? Any help greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I can understand your dilemma and hope we can help you.

 

If I were in your position, I would issue ET papers within the deadline just in case, but I'm not sure who they should be against.

 

I hope the guys will know the answer.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be on the safe side you could put the old company in section 2 of your ET1, then put both the administrator and the new company in section 11.

In the blank space at section 7 you can explain that you have incuded all 3 potential respondents as you have been unable to ascertain which of them is liable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I was made redundant on 5th January and as yet no payment, Any time you phone them they say they are investigating a possible tupe transfer but the employer has already supplied all the information to prove this wasn't the case, they are looking any excuse to get out of paying our redundancy, its dragged on so long I have had to open a tribunal case and has no end in sight. Has anyone else had issues with these clowns?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are notoriously slow! I guess it's the volume of work they have to deal with. Just be patient and keep chasing them. It took around 4 months the last time I dealt with them for payments to be processed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Myself and my former co workers chase them weekly but its the same old story, "We are still investigating" There doesn't seem to be any progress at all, completely fed up. 14 weeks now I make it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

When its coming from the national insurance fund what way does it work exactly? Do you receive your redundancy payment first then pay in lieu of notice and unpaid wages etc? And whats the time scale between the 2?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Do you have another thread about this already please? Otherwise, I think the guys may need a few more details from you in order to advise.

 

I assume you're trying to claim from a company that has gone into adminstration or similar?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it went into administration, there was alot of confusions as to whether a tupe transfer occurred as it got taken over but they have investigated and decided to pay 5 months later :( and I should have some money next week, I just have no info on how exactly payments work and what way they do it, I think they pay redundancy first but am unsure about wages and the likes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have only actually claimed once from the RPO. This was 2009 and this client was claiming (from memory) unpaid SRP, unpaid wages (notice pay), unpaid holiday and I think also the basic award for unfair dismissal.

 

The client did receive the sums in 2 separate cheques about 2 or 3 weeks apart. It was not a difficult process and we filled in one RP1, and the RPO sent a further questionnaire as regards the unpaid holiday and wages I think.

 

You can get an overview of what you can claim here http://www.purnells.co.uk/limited-company/employees.html and also see the RPO phone numbers there. Now I cannot remember if you have to put the ET1 in to get the basic award for unfair dismissal, I remember that we nearly did because the 3 months was coming up and the RPO had not processed the claim but this part I can't remember right now.

 

Just contact the RPO and double check about the unfair dismissal element - that is if that applies to you as this is not clear from the OP.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, No unfair dismissal, the RPO deemed a tupe transfer did not take place although it took them almost 5 months to look into it. So now they have that sorted I am hoping the payments are quick with no more hold ups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok got a letter today saying money should be in tomorrow or Wednesday, and a questionnaire for PILON which asks what benefits I claimed etc, but no mention of unpaid wages etc, when are these paid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got this letter today.

 

I refer to your claim for payment from the National Insurance Fund regarding Holiday and arrears of Pay owing in respect to your former employer named above.

 

I regret to inform you that we must reject your claim as under the Employment Rights NI Order 1996 holiday pay and arrears of pay cannot be paid after the date your former employer became legally insolvent. The above named employer entered into a CVA on 25/5/11. You last worked 9/1/12, 8 months after this date therfore we cannot make a payment to you from the National Insurance fund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I think you may need to tell us a bit more in order for the guys to advise you. The letter seems to say that your employer was insolvent months before you stopped working there. Is this right please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently they got put on a Company Voluntary Arrangement last Spring, I suppose the plan was to try and continue and hope for the best, they closed in January.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...